Sad that it happened, it was unnecesary: Avesh Khan on his controversial celebration against RCB
Bengaluru: Avesh Khan, the fast bowler from Madhya Pradesh, expressed regret over his helmet-throwing incident during an IPL match between Lucknow Supergiant's and Royal Challengers Bangalore in Bengaluru. In an interview with the Indian Express, Khan admitted that his emotions got the better of him in the heat of the moment, leading to the incident.
He acknowledged that his actions were inappropriate and expressed remorse for his behavior, particularly as it gained significant attention and criticism on social media.
Looking ahead, Khan is hopeful of making a comeback to the Indian team as the West Indies series approaches. His last appearance for India was in October 2022 against South Africa. While he was not included in the T20 World Cup squad in Australia, Khan performed well in domestic cricket, particularly in test matches, where he claimed 38 wickets in eight matches for Madhya Pradesh. However, his IPL campaign did not meet his personal expectations. Despite this, Khan highlighted his contribution to the team, bowling crucial overs in the powerplay and at the death, and maintaining an economy rate of less than 10 in a season characterized by high-scoring matches.
Khan received praise from his Lucknow team coach, Andy Flower, for his dedication and selflessness in prioritizing the team's success. Flower commended Khan's commitment, even playing through injuries, as he had stitches in his hand during some IPL games. Khan emphasized the challenges faced by fast bowlers, particularly the mental toll of transitioning from international cricket to domestic cricket. He spoke about the demanding schedule, physical strain, and limited rest days associated with playing domestic matches.
In his pursuit of an India comeback, Khan has sought guidance from various experts. Subroto Banerjee, a current selector, advised him to focus on keeping his wrist straight, while Paras Mhambrey, the Indian team's bowling coach, provided insights on utilizing the non-bowling arm effectively. Additionally, Gautam Gambhir, the Lucknow team mentor, encouraged Khan to bowl at maximum pace, even if it meant conceding runs. Khan has diligently analyzed his bowling videos to identify areas for improvement and work on rectifying his shortcomings, Khan said during the interview.
When asked about his chances of being selected for the upcoming tour of the West Indies, Khan remained hopeful but acknowledged that the selection process was beyond his control. He expressed determination to make a comeback and emphasized his commitment to achieving that goal.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
BJD leaders demand action against MP Sasmit Patra for creating confusion over Waqf Bill voting
Bhubaneswar, Apr 5 (PTI): A section of senior BJD leaders on Saturday demanded strong action against Rajya Sabha MP and national spokesperson Sasmit Patra for "creating confusion" among lawmakers ahead of the voting on Waqf (Amendment) Bill in the upper house of Parliament.
Patra, also the leader of the BJD in Rajya Sabha, is in the eye of the storm after revealing that he had voted in favour of the contentious Bill.
After the BJD announced it would oppose the Bill, and even party MP Muzibulla Khan spoke against it in Rajya Sabha on April 3, Patra put out a post on X before voting, stating that party MPs could vote "as per their conscience" and that there was no whip issued to them.
This led to confusion among the lawmakers, and many senior leaders have raised questions about whether Patra could change the decision of Naveen Patnaik, who apart from being the BJD president, was also chairman of the parliamentary party.
"I abstained from voting due to confusion... the party had earlier decided to oppose the Bill and at the last moment, we were asked to vote as per our conscience," another Rajya Sabha MP, Debasish Samantray, said.
He, however, chose not to blame Patra.
"Sasmit Patra is not the villain here. He does not take decisions, he merely follows instructions. The real power lies elsewhere, with the 'chief advisor'," Samantray told reporters, indicating a close aide of Patnaik.
He refused to divulge the name of the "chief advisor" and said, "Everybody knows who he is".
The BJD MP also hinted at a "big deal" between the "chief advisor" and the BJP.
"There has been a big deal. The chief advisor has made some kind of arrangement with the BJP. A bureaucrat who has recently taken voluntary retirement may be part of this deal. You all know who has recently taken VRS. I leave it to your understanding," Samantray said.
Senior Odisha cadre IAS officer Sujata R Karthikeyan, the wife of BJD president Naveen Patnaik's former close aide V K Pandian, recently took voluntary retirement from government service.
Karthikeyan, a 2000-batch Odisha cadre officer, was serving as the special secretary in Odisha's finance department.
At least two senior BJD leaders -- Prafulla Samal and Pratap Jena -- have written letters to Patnaik demanding action against Patra for "going against the party stand by voting in support of Waqf Bill".
Also, Ganeswar Behera, the sitting MLA of Muslim-dominated Kendrapara assembly segment, also criticised Patra, questioning, "Who gave Patra the authority to change the party president's decision?"
"He has committed a mistake for which he is liable to action. Only BJD president has the authority to change the decision of the parliamentary party and nobody else," he told reporters, adding that this amounts to gross indiscipline.
Both Samal and Jena, in their letters to Patnaik, stated that the BJD continues to fight for the socio-economic development of minority communities including Muslims.
"However, instead of winning the trust of the minority communities, such action of Patra has caused damage to the party's image. Therefore, I urge you to take action as deemed fit," Samal said.
Senior BJD leader and former minister Pratap Jena expressed displeasure over Patra's action and termed the move "anti-party" and "shocking".
"Patra's recent social media posts reflect a mindset that contradicts the BJD's ideological position," Jena said.
Jena also raised suspicion over Patra's behaviour and demanded a thorough inquiry into the matter.
"We must investigate who is behind this conspiracy and people responsible for this should be held accountable," he said, demanding disciplinary action against Patra.
BJD MLA and former minister Badri Narayan Patra was more critical: "This situation was a result of a deliberate mischief. How could Sasmit Patra dare to defy the BJD president's decision and announce on his own X platform regarding the change of stand? He has put the entire party in a fix and this needs action."
A senior BJD leader, on condition of anonymity, said party leaders representing Muslim-dominated constituencies are worried following the party's change of stand on the Waqf Bill.
"The Muslims, who constitute over 2.17 per cent of the state's population, have all along supported the BJD. Now, they may change their political affiliation to the Congress. The present situation has given a wrong message to the Muslim community," he said.
Though a section of senior BJD leaders met Patnaik and held discussions on the matter on Friday, the BJD president was yet to give any remark on the prevailing political situation.
Patra could not be contacted as he was on a tour to Tashkent from April 5 to 9 as part of the delegation of the 150th Assembly of Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU).
Reacting to the developments, Odisha BJP spokesperson Anil Biswal said, "The recent developments indicate that Patnaik has lost control over his party MPs. He could not impose a whip on them because he does not have command of the party."
On allegations about a "deal" between BJD and BJP over the Waqf Bill, Samal said, "We do not do deals. Nation is first for us. People worried about the rights of poor Muslims have supported the Bill. The seven BJD MPs have been divided into three categories: one who supported the Bill, those who opposed it and one who abstained from voting. There is no unanimity in the BJD."
