(Based on reports by cairnsnews.com and The Defender)

A Dutch court has ruled that Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft and leading global philanthropist, will face trial in the Netherlands following a lawsuit involving COVID-19 vaccine injuries. The case, which includes multiple other high-profile defendants, claims that the vaccines were unsafe and had negative health impacts on the plaintiffs. This development has been largely covered by local Dutch sources, with outlets like De Telegraaf and independent platforms Zebra Inspiratie bringing attention to the case. However, major international news networks have not widely reported the matter.

According to cairnsnews.com, the lawsuit was originally filed in the District Court of Leeuwarden, the Netherlands. In it, seven Dutch citizens allege that Bill Gates, along with former Dutch Prime Minister and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Pfizer CEO Dr. Albert Bourla, and members of the Netherlands’ COVID-19 Outbreak Management Team, knowingly misrepresented the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. This group, who self-identify as “corona skeptics,” believes the defendants disregarded potential health risks, leading to significant physical harm among those who received the vaccine. The Defender, another independent media platform cited in the cairnsnews.com report, indicates that one plaintiff has died, leaving six to continue the case.

The court’s jurisdiction over Gates was challenged, as his representatives argued he resides in the United States and should not be subject to Dutch legal proceedings. However, the Leeuwarden court ruled on October 16 that it does hold jurisdiction, given the “connected” nature of the claims against Gates and the other defendants and the fact that the case pertains to issues that directly affect Dutch citizens. As per De Andere Krant, Gates will now be responsible for legal fees totaling approximately €1,406.

The plaintiffs’ primary contention, as outlined in cairnsnews.com and The Defender, is that Gates and other officials promoted the vaccine without adequate transparency about its risks. Dutch independent journalist Erica Krikke told The Defender that the plaintiffs argue Gates’ foundation played a role in shaping COVID-19 policies globally and in the Netherlands. In response, they are now asking for legal redress, claiming they were misled about the vaccine's safety, and that injuries resulted from this alleged misinformation.

The cairnsnews.com report highlights that Gates is represented in the Netherlands by Pels Rijcken, the country’s largest litigation firm, based in The Hague. This firm, which did not contest the basis of the claims, focused instead on challenging the court’s jurisdiction over Gates, given his American residency. Other defendants, including Pfizer’s Dr. Bourla, did not dispute Dutch jurisdiction.

During the September 18 hearing, plaintiffs’ statements were made before the court. According to Zebra Inspiratie, one of the plaintiffs, unable to speak due to health complications from the vaccine, was represented by her father, who gave an emotional account of her declining health post-vaccination. Krikke shared that this testimony led to a reflective pause from the judge, indicating the impact of these personal stories on the legal proceedings.

The case also raises broader issues about the global COVID-19 vaccination drive, with plaintiffs arguing that the defendants' support for the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) "Great Reset" agenda may have influenced their actions. The Leeuwarden court ruling includes references to the Gates Foundation’s affiliation with the WEF, which advocates for “centralized, global intervention” to manage crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Defender also quotes New Zealand-based independent journalist Penny Marie, who has closely followed this case. Marie expressed hope that the Dutch court’s decision to proceed with this case will set a precedent for similar lawsuits worldwide, particularly those against individuals involved in large-scale public health policies. Marie believes the ruling may support other plaintiffs’ efforts to bring international figures to trial in their respective countries, even if those defendants are not based locally.

This lawsuit, according to cairnsnews.com, serves as a rare instance in which vaccine injury claims against global figures, including Gates, have advanced in court. Dutch attorney Meike Terhorst, however, remains cautious, noting that previous lawsuits related to COVID-19 policies in the Netherlands have seen limited success. She pointed out that many judges in the Netherlands tend to support vaccination programs, which could present challenges for this case’s outcome.

Both cairnsnews.com and The Defender also reference Pfizer’s admission in its COVID-19 mRNA documents that shingles, a condition reported by some vaccine recipients, could be linked to the vaccine. The World Health Organization has previously designated shingles as similar to Monkeypox, a virus declared a “public health emergency of international concern” on August 14, 2024.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi (PTI): Prolific batters Shubman Gill and Smriti Mandhana were named the Best International Cricketers (Men's and Women's) at the BCCI Naman Awards 2026 here on Sunday, recognising their outstanding performances in the 2024–2025 season.

Gill won the prestigious Polly Umrigar Award, while Mandhana received the award for the fifth time.

For Gill, it was his second Cricketer of the Year award after first winning it in 2023.

Former stars Roger Binny, Rahul Dravid and Mithali Raj were honoured with the Col. C. K. Nayudu Lifetime Achievement Award, the BCCI's highest honour, recognising their outstanding service to Indian cricket.

India's five trophy-winning sides (2025 ICC Champions Trophy, 2025 Women's ODI World Cup, 2025 U-19 Women's World Cup, 2026 Men's U-19 World Cup, and 2026 T20 World Cup) were honoured as well on the occasion.

Gill enjoyed a stellar 2025 and established himself as one of the team's most dependable batters in the longer formats.

On the tour of England, skipper Gill led from the front in the five-Test series, finishing as the top run-getter with 754 runs in 10 innings at an average of 75.40, including four centuries and a top score of 269.

Gill also played a pivotal role in India's Champions Trophy triumph last year, having entered the tournament as the No.1-ranked ODI batter in the world. He made an unbeaten 101 against Bangladesh in India's opening match, and finished the tournament with 188 runs.

Mandhana finished 2025 with 1,703 international runs, including 1,362 in ODIs, the most by any woman in a calendar year. In doing so, Mandhana became the first batter in women's ODI history to score 1,000 runs in a single calendar year.

Mandhana also made handsome contributions to India's maiden Women's World Cup title triumph, aggregating 434 runs in nine matches to end as the tournament as India's leading run-scorer and the second-highest overall.

Before the World Cup, the left-hander Mandhana smashed a 50-ball century against Australia in New Delhi to register the fastest ODI hundred by an Indian batter, surpassing Virat Kohli's 52-ball effort.

Shafali Varma (Best Woman Cricketer Senior Domestic One-Day), Ira Jadhav (Best Woman Cricketer (Domestic), Harsh Dubey (Best All Rounder in the Ranji Trophy), and Ayush Mhatre (Best All Rounder in Domestic Limited Overs Competitions) too won awards for their strong performances across the 2024-25 domestic season.