Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO to stand trial in Netherlands over alleged COVID-19 vaccine injuries
(Based on reports by cairnsnews.com and The Defender)
A Dutch court has ruled that Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft and leading global philanthropist, will face trial in the Netherlands following a lawsuit involving COVID-19 vaccine injuries. The case, which includes multiple other high-profile defendants, claims that the vaccines were unsafe and had negative health impacts on the plaintiffs. This development has been largely covered by local Dutch sources, with outlets like De Telegraaf and independent platforms Zebra Inspiratie bringing attention to the case. However, major international news networks have not widely reported the matter.
According to cairnsnews.com, the lawsuit was originally filed in the District Court of Leeuwarden, the Netherlands. In it, seven Dutch citizens allege that Bill Gates, along with former Dutch Prime Minister and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Pfizer CEO Dr. Albert Bourla, and members of the Netherlands’ COVID-19 Outbreak Management Team, knowingly misrepresented the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. This group, who self-identify as “corona skeptics,” believes the defendants disregarded potential health risks, leading to significant physical harm among those who received the vaccine. The Defender, another independent media platform cited in the cairnsnews.com report, indicates that one plaintiff has died, leaving six to continue the case.
The court’s jurisdiction over Gates was challenged, as his representatives argued he resides in the United States and should not be subject to Dutch legal proceedings. However, the Leeuwarden court ruled on October 16 that it does hold jurisdiction, given the “connected” nature of the claims against Gates and the other defendants and the fact that the case pertains to issues that directly affect Dutch citizens. As per De Andere Krant, Gates will now be responsible for legal fees totaling approximately €1,406.
The plaintiffs’ primary contention, as outlined in cairnsnews.com and The Defender, is that Gates and other officials promoted the vaccine without adequate transparency about its risks. Dutch independent journalist Erica Krikke told The Defender that the plaintiffs argue Gates’ foundation played a role in shaping COVID-19 policies globally and in the Netherlands. In response, they are now asking for legal redress, claiming they were misled about the vaccine's safety, and that injuries resulted from this alleged misinformation.
The cairnsnews.com report highlights that Gates is represented in the Netherlands by Pels Rijcken, the country’s largest litigation firm, based in The Hague. This firm, which did not contest the basis of the claims, focused instead on challenging the court’s jurisdiction over Gates, given his American residency. Other defendants, including Pfizer’s Dr. Bourla, did not dispute Dutch jurisdiction.
During the September 18 hearing, plaintiffs’ statements were made before the court. According to Zebra Inspiratie, one of the plaintiffs, unable to speak due to health complications from the vaccine, was represented by her father, who gave an emotional account of her declining health post-vaccination. Krikke shared that this testimony led to a reflective pause from the judge, indicating the impact of these personal stories on the legal proceedings.
The case also raises broader issues about the global COVID-19 vaccination drive, with plaintiffs arguing that the defendants' support for the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) "Great Reset" agenda may have influenced their actions. The Leeuwarden court ruling includes references to the Gates Foundation’s affiliation with the WEF, which advocates for “centralized, global intervention” to manage crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Defender also quotes New Zealand-based independent journalist Penny Marie, who has closely followed this case. Marie expressed hope that the Dutch court’s decision to proceed with this case will set a precedent for similar lawsuits worldwide, particularly those against individuals involved in large-scale public health policies. Marie believes the ruling may support other plaintiffs’ efforts to bring international figures to trial in their respective countries, even if those defendants are not based locally.
This lawsuit, according to cairnsnews.com, serves as a rare instance in which vaccine injury claims against global figures, including Gates, have advanced in court. Dutch attorney Meike Terhorst, however, remains cautious, noting that previous lawsuits related to COVID-19 policies in the Netherlands have seen limited success. She pointed out that many judges in the Netherlands tend to support vaccination programs, which could present challenges for this case’s outcome.
Both cairnsnews.com and The Defender also reference Pfizer’s admission in its COVID-19 mRNA documents that shingles, a condition reported by some vaccine recipients, could be linked to the vaccine. The World Health Organization has previously designated shingles as similar to Monkeypox, a virus declared a “public health emergency of international concern” on August 14, 2024.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
UDF leaders see local body poll trends as pointer to 2026 Assembly elections in Kerala
Thiruvananthapuram (PTI): Buoyed by the strong performance of the Congress-led UDF in the local body polls, KPCC president Sunny Joseph said on Saturday that the front's results indicated the people had rejected the LDF government.
According to early trends, the UDF was leading in more grama panchayats, block panchayats, municipalities and corporations than the LDF.
The local body polls were held in two phases in the state earlier this week.
ALSO READ: Cong candidate who moved Kerala HC for name reinstatement in voter list, wins
Speaking to reporters here, Joseph said the people of Kerala had extended their support to the UDF.
"We could expose the LDF government’s anti-people stance and the people understood it. The LDF’s fake propaganda was rejected by the people. The UDF is moving towards a historic victory," he said.
He said a united effort, proper preparations, good candidate selection and hard work had resulted in the Congress and the UDF’s victory in the elections.
Asked about the prospects in the Thiruvananthapuram Corporation, Joseph said the party was studying the matter and would comment later.
LDF convenor T P Ramakrishnan said the results would be closely examined.
According to him, the government had done everything possible for the people.
"Why such a verdict happened will be examined at the micro level. People’s opinion will be considered and further steps will be taken," he said.
He added that decisions would be taken after analysing the results. "If any corrective measures are required, we will initiate them and move forward," he said.
AICC leader K C Venugopal said the results showed that people had begun ousting those who, he alleged, were responsible for the loss of gold at Lord Ayyappa’s temple.
"This trend will continue in the Assembly elections as well. It is an indication that the people are ready to bring down the LDF government," he said.
Venugopal said the UDF had registered victories even in CPI(M) and LDF strongholds.
"I congratulate all UDF workers for their hard work. Congress workers and leaders worked unitedly," he said.
Referring to remarks made by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan against the Congress on polling day, Venugopal said the voters had responded through the verdict.
"I do not know whether the chief minister understands that the people are against him. Otherwise, he does not know the sentiment of the people. The state government cannot move an inch further," he said.
He said the results indicated a strong comeback for the UDF in Kerala.
Asked whether the Sabarimala gold loss issue had affected the LDF in the local polls, Venugopal said the CM and the CPI(M) state secretary did not take the issue seriously.
"We took a strong stand on the matter. The BJP played a foul game in it," he alleged.
On the BJP's role in the local body elections, Venugopal alleged that the party operated with the CPI(M) 's tacit support.
"The CPI(M) supported the central government on issues such as PM-SHRI, labour codes and corruption in national highway construction. The CPI(M) is facing ideological decline, and the state government’s policies are against the party’s own decisions," he said.
Meanwhile, LDF ally Kerala Congress (M) leader Jose K Mani said the party could not win all the wards it had expected in the elections.
He congratulated winners from all parties and said the party would closely examine the losses and identify shortcomings. "Later, we will take corrective measures," he added.
Senior Congress leader and MP Rajmohan Unnithan said the trends in the local body elections indicated that the UDF would return to power in the 2026 Assembly elections.
"We will win 111 seats as in 1977 and return to power in 2026. The anti-government sentiment of the people is reflected in the elections," he said.
Unnithan said the people were disturbed and unhappy with the present government.
"The trend indicates the end of the LDF government," he added.
CPI(M) MLA M M Mani said the people had shown ingratitude towards the LDF despite benefiting from welfare schemes.
"After receiving all welfare schemes and living comfortably, people voted against us due to some temporary sentiments. Is that not ingratitude," he asked.
Mani said no such welfare initiatives had taken place in Kerala earlier.
"People are receiving pensions and have enough to eat. Even after getting all this, they voted against us. This is what can be called ingratitude," he said.
Muslim League state president Panakkad Sayyid Sadiq Ali Shihab Thangal said the results were beyond expectations.
"The outcome points towards the Secretariat in Thiruvananthapuram, indicating that a change of government is imminent. We are going to win the Assembly election," he said.
