Cairo, Sep 8: An Egyptian court on Saturday issued its final verdict upholding the death sentences of 75 Muslim Brotherhood members and supporters -- including journalists -- for participating in protests following the 2013 ouster of democratically elected President Mohamed Morsi.

The mass trial has been widely condemned by human rights organizations, with Amnesty International calling it a "grotesque parody of justice", the BBC reported.

The case dates back to 2013 when Morsi supporters gathered in Rabaa al Adawiya Square in Cairo's Nasr City district following his overthrow by the Army in July 2013 in response to mass protests against his one-year rule.

The 739 defendants, who included members of the Muslim Brotherhood, were arrested and tried for participating in the month-long sit-in in Cairo to protest Morsi's removal.

Earlier this year, Egypt's Parliament gave military officers immunity for the deadly crackdown and any crimes committed between July 2013 and January 2016.

Those who were sentenced in the mass trial were accused of security-related offences including incitement to violence, murder and organising illegal protests.

The 75 death sentences were handed down in July and Saturday's confirmation of them and the additional verdicts mark the end of the mass trial.

Among those sentenced to death at the Cairo Criminal Court were prominent Muslim Brotherhood members Essam El-Erian, Mohamed Beltagy, Abdel-Rahman al-Bar and Osama Yassin. Of the 75 people, 44 are in jail and 31 are on the run.

Another 56 defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment, including Mohamed Badie, leader of the now banned Muslim Brotherhood.

About 200 defendants were sentenced to five years behind bars, among them award-winning photojournalist Mahmoud Abu Zeid. He was detained while taking pictures of the dispersal of the demonstration. He was expected to now walk free after having spent five years in jail pending trial.

Osama Morsi, the son of the ousted President, was sentenced to 10 years in prison. Another 360 defendants were sentenced to 15 years in prison. No one was found innocent.

Of the accused, 315 are jailed and 419 are fugitives. Charges were dropped against five defendants who died.

The government's actions in dispersing the Rabaa el Adawiya Square protest were widely condemned as at least 817 people were killed in the violence, according to a 2014 report by Human Rights Watch.

Saturday's verdict came shortly after the US government released tens of millions of dollars in military aid to Egypt, funds that had been previously withheld due to concerns over the country's human rights record.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Chennai: A plea has been filed in the Madras High Court seeking the establishment of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) or directions to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) or Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe the corruption charges against Indian businessman Gautam Adani. The plea follows Adani’s indictment by the United States Department of Justice in the Eastern District of New York on bribery charges.

Filed by Advocate and Desiya Makkal Sakthi Katchi President ML Ravi, the plea alleges that Adani, along with other businessmen and power distribution companies in India, was involved in a scheme to bribe Indian government officials. The bribes were reportedly aimed at securing lucrative solar energy contracts with Indian entities. According to the US Department of Justice, Adani’s group paid USD 265 million in bribes, primarily to officials in Andhra Pradesh, to secure contracts with state electricity distribution companies between 2001 and 2023.

Ravi criticised the Indian authorities for their silence on the matter, despite the exposure of the corruption by foreign agencies. He argued that the lack of action by Indian investigation agencies undermines public trust and hinders national development. He called for a thorough investigation to uncover the full extent of the allegations, asserting that public officials had abused their power for personal gain, in violation of their duties.