Jerusalem: A video circulating on social media, purportedly showing Hamas terrorists burning alive two Israeli soldiers, has been debunked. The video in question, which recently went viral, is not a recent incident involving Hamas and Israeli soldiers. Instead, the video dates back to 2016 and depicts a act committed by the Islamic State (ISIS) group.

Verification Details: The truth about the video was uncovered through diligent fact-checking. A response to the viral claim mentioned that the video was old and originated from Syria. Subsequent keyword searches led to reports by credible sources such as Hindustan Times, Al Arabia News, New York Post, Fox News, The Sun, and the Syrian Human Rights Committee. These reports, shared in December 2016, documented the ISIS video showing the burning alive of two Turkish soldiers.

The 19-minute video, allegedly filmed in the IS-declared “Aleppo Province” in northern Syria, was released by the Islamic State (ISIS) group. Despite the misleading claims circulating on social media, the video has no connection to Hamas or recent events involving Israeli soldiers.

Conclusion: The viral video falsely claimed to show Hamas burning alive two Israeli soldiers, but it is an old video from Syria depicting an ISIS attack on two Turkish soldiers in 2016.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Prayagraj, Jul 25 (PTI): The Allahabad High Court has observed that each incident of mob lynching or mob violence is a separate incident and cannot be monitored in a public interest litigation (PIL).

A bench of Justices Siddharth and Avnish Saxena was hearing a PIL filed by Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind seeking compliance of apex court's guidelines for checking incidents of mob lynching.

Disposing of the PIL, the bench said that the judgement of the apex court in the Tehseen S. Poonawalla Vs Union of India (2018) is binding upon the state government as well as the central government.

"Therefore, it is always open for the aggrieved party to approach the government first before rushing to this court seeking compliance of the judgement of apex court," it added.

In the PIL, the petitioner had sought extensive directions concerning the implementation of the apex court's binding guidelines in the case of Tehseen Poonawalla.

In the PIL, specific incidents of mob lynching and mob violence in Uttar Pradesh, including one in May in Aligarh, were referred.

The petitioner had sought setting up of a special investigation team (SIT) headed by an inspector general-rank officer to investigate the mob violence incident in Aligarh, the notification and circular related to the appointment of nodal officers in each district dealing with mob lynching cases, along with a status report on such cases.

Counsel for the state government opposed the maintainability of the PIL.

In its judgment passed on July 15, the court said that although the reliefs prayed in the PIL were consistent with the apex court's guidelines in Tehseen Poonawalla case, they could not be granted through a PIL seeking general oversight over individual incidents.

The court, however, noted that the affected parties have the liberty to first approach the appropriate government authority for the implementation of the apex court's directions.