How many innocent Palestinian does Israel has to slaughter? Irish MP questions government
Dublin: In a powerful exchange within the Irish Parliament, Member of Parliament Richard Boyd Barrett confronted Prime Minister Leo Varadkar over Ireland's response to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. Boyd Barrett condemned Israel's actions, labeling them as war crimes and genocide, and called for immediate international sanctions and accountability.
Varadkar, in response, stressed Ireland's commitment to promoting peace and justice in the region, advocating for a two-state solution and collaboration with the European Union, the United States, and Middle Eastern nations.
In his speech on October 24 in the Irish Parliament, Richard Boyd Barrett, raised a poignant question to the Prime Minister of his country, stating, "How many innocent Palestinian civilians, men, women, and children, does Israel have to slaughter? How many war crimes does Israel have to commit? How much death and destruction does Israel have to visit upon the people of Gaza and Palestine before you will call for and impose sanctions on Israel and expel the Israeli ambassador from this country? How much longer will the international community turn a blind eye to the suffering of the Palestinians?"
He continued, asserting, "We cannot ignore the gravity of the situation. The world must hold Israel accountable for its actions. The continuous loss of innocent lives demands immediate attention. The international community must step in and demand justice for the Palestinian people."
He further emphasized the necessity of international intervention, saying, "It is our moral duty to stand against the atrocities being committed. Israel's actions cannot go unpunished. We must call for and impose sanctions on Israel, expel the Israeli ambassador from our country, and urgently refer Israel to the International Criminal Court for its crimes against humanity and war crimes."
He highlighted the undeniable facts surrounding Israel's actions, stating, "In front of the world, by their own admission, Israel is committing war crimes. This isn't a matter of opinion; they have declared their intention publicly. Israel is displacing more than a million Palestinians from their homes in Gaza, ethnically cleansing them, which constitutes a crime against humanity. They have publicly stated their intention to deny 2.2 million people access to water, electricity, medicine, and life-saving equipment. These atrocities are unfolding before the eyes of the world, and they continue unabated."
He continued, expressing deep concern over the ongoing violence, saying, "Every minute, children are being slaughtered by Israeli artillery in a relentless bombardment of residential complexes, hospitals, schools, and civilian infrastructure. The gravity of these actions cannot be overstated. The international community must recognize the urgency of the situation and take immediate steps to address these egregious violations of human rights."
He lamented, "They just go on and on, and you do nothing. Nothing but words of concern, yet no action to hold them to account. It is undeniably premeditated war crimes and genocide. Scholars and academics, including Jewish people in the United States, Canada, and around the world, have labeled these actions as genocidal."
Quoting Israeli officials, Boyd Barrett revealed the shocking rhetoric used by some in power, stating, "An Israeli General brazenly declared, 'Human animals must be treated as such; there will be no electricity and no water, there will only be destruction.' A minister openly stated, 'We are fighting human animals; we will act accordingly; we will remove every restriction on the IDF.' Another minister, Smotrich, asserted, 'There is no such thing as the Palestinians.' Furthermore, the President of Israel referred to the people of Gaza and said they are all responsible."
He went on to mention a significant incident, saying, "Before October 7th, Netanyahu appeared in front of the UN General Assembly with a map of Israel that had removed all references to Palestine, a clear declaration of intent to destroy the Palestinian people and steal all of their land."
In response to Richard Boyd Barrett's concerns about the situation in the Middle East, Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar emphasized the need to protect innocent lives, both Palestinian and Israeli. He expressed his condolences for the Israeli citizen who lost her life due to violence in the region and highlighted the importance of multilateral actions in addressing the crisis. Varadkar stated that individually imposed sanctions would not be effective and underscored the significance of keeping lines of communication open with countries involved in the conflict, including having ambassadors in place.
Varadkar condemned collective punishment and hostage-taking, affirming Ireland's stance against targeting civilian infrastructure. He also acknowledged Hamas's objective, which he described as seeking the destruction of Israel, raising concerns about the existence of a Jewish state established by the UN.
In response to Prime Minister Leo Varadkar's comments, Richard Boyd Barrett retorted, asserting the world's responsibility in addressing the harsh realities of the Israeli regime. Barrett pointed out, "The world is responsible for failing to call out the reality of the Israeli regime. It is an apartheid regime that was established through the ethnic cleansing of 750,000 Palestinians. This regime continues its policies of ethnic cleansing on a daily basis, particularly in East Jerusalem and across the West Bank, regardless of the presence of Hamas."
He went on to provide historical context, stating, "Even in the absence of Hamas, back in 1987 during the First Palestinian intifada, young people rose up because their entire future had been stolen from them. They faced severe oppression under the Israeli regime and military. At that time, there was no Hamas; there was no significant Palestinian resistance organization. Yet, Israel responded to their legitimate grievances with brutality, murder, administrative detention, and ethnic cleansing. These actions have persisted day in and day out."
Boyd Barrett criticized the lack of acknowledgment from governments, including Varadkar's, regarding the Israeli regime's apartheid policies and ongoing ethnic cleansing. He argued, "Your government refuses to even label them as an apartheid regime, let alone acknowledge the war crimes and ethnic cleansing that numerous human rights organizations have pleaded with you and European governments to address. The world has given Israel the license to conduct the savagery we are witnessing today. They are responsible for the crimes we are witnessing. If we genuinely want to end these senseless deaths, we must hold Israel accountable for its actions."
Prime Minister Leo Varadkar further clarified Ireland's role in promoting peace and justice in the Middle East. He highlighted the importance of collaboration with the European Union, the United States, and other countries in the region such as Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon. He also advocated for a new peace initiative and a two-state solution, emphasizing the need for normal contacts and economic relations between Palestine and Israel.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Disqualification row: SC unhappy over Telangana CM's statement on bye-elections
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed its displeasure over Telangana Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy's statement in the assembly that there would be no bye-elections, and said he was expected to exercise "some degree of restraint".
"Did we commit a mistake by letting him go at that time and not taking an action for contempt?" a bench of Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih asked.
The top court was perhaps referring to a separate matter in which it had last year disapproved of Reddy's comments on the top court granting bail to rival BRS leader K Kavitha in cases linked to the alleged Delhi excise policy scam.
The apex court's observations came during the arguments on the pleas raising the issue of alleged delay by the Telangana Assembly speaker in deciding on petitions seeking disqualification of 10 BRS MLAs who had defected to the Congress.
The bench reserved its verdict in the matter.
During the arguments, the issue over Reddy's recent statement in the assembly cropped up before the bench.
"Mr Singhvi, having experience of earlier occasion, was the chief minister not expected to at least exercise some degree of restraint?" Justice Gavai asked senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, who was appearing for the assembly speaker.
Justice Gavai said the court was not bothered about statements of politicians.
"We exercise self-restraint. We respect the other two wings of the democracy. Same is expected of the other two wings also," he said.
Senior advocate C A Sundaram, representing the petitioner and BRS leader Padi Kaushik Reddy, referred to the transcripts of the chief minister's statement, calling it shocking.
A BRS MLA, the counsel said, had said in the assembly that this should not be raked up as the matter was pending before the apex court but the chief minister still made the statement.
Sundaram quoted the chief minister's statement as saying, "Mr speaker, I am telling on your behalf to everyone present in the assembly that they need not worry about any bye-elections in future. No Bye-elections will come".
Sundaram said when the chief minister made the statement, the speaker did not say anything.
During the hearing, the bench asked what would be the "reasonable period" for a speaker to decide on the disqualification petitions.
It asked whether such applications for disqualification "should be permitted to die its natural death and the Tenth Schedule be thrown in the dustbin?".
The Tenth Schedule of the Constitution deals with provisions on disqualification on the ground of defection.
Sundaram requested the bench to put a time limit for deciding the disqualification petitions, referring to it as an "extraordinary situation".
Reddy had allegedly said in the assembly on March 26 that there would be no bye-elections even if BRS members switched sides.
"If this is said on the floor of the house, your chief minister is making a mockery of the Tenth Schedule," the bench said on April 2.
The apex court had also asked the speaker why he took about 10 months to issue notices on the petitions for the disqualification of BRS MLAs who defected to the Congress.
While one of the pleas in the apex court has challenged the November 2024 order of the Telangana High Court in a matter concerning petitions seeking the disqualification of three BRS MLAs, another petition relates to the remaining seven legislators who defected.
A division bench of the high court in November last year said the Assembly speaker must decide the disqualification petitions against the three MLAs within a "reasonable time".
The division bench's verdict came on the appeals against the September 9, 2024, order of a single judge.
The single judge had directed the secretary of the Telangana Assembly to place the petition seeking the disqualifications before the speaker for fixing a schedule of hearing within four weeks.
On March 4, the apex court sought responses from the Telangana government and others on the pleas, saying a timely decision was the key and there could not be a case of "operation successful but patient is dead".
It had also sought the responses of MLAs Danam Nagender, Venkata Rao Tellam and Kadiyam Srihari in the matter.
