New York sues Trump Foundation, alleging 'extensive' lawbreaking
New York, June 15: New York's Attorney General has announced she is suing the Trump Foundation, as well as Donald Trump and his children, alleging "extensive and persistent" lawbreaking.
Barbara Underwood said on Thursday that the charitable foundation had engaged in "unlawful political co-ordination" designed to influence the 2016 election.
The lawsuit seeks to dissolve the foundation, Ms Underwood said.
The foundation denied the charges, calling them politically motivated.
In a statement, Underwood said Trump had illegally instructed the foundation to provide support to his presidential campaign by using the foundation's name and funds it raised to promote the campaign.
The petition also claims that Trump used charitable assets to pay off legal obligations, to promote his own businesses and to purchase personal items.
The Attorney General is also seeking to bar the president and three of his adult children, Donald Jr, Eric and Ivanka, from serving on the board of any New York-based charity, "in light of misconduct and total lack of oversight".
The President hit back at the lawsuit on Twitter, saying that "sleazy New York Democrats" were "doing everything they can to sue me". He vowed he would not settle the case.
The lawsuit alleges that the foundation paid $100,000 (£75,000) to settle legal claims against Trump's Mar-A-Lago resort, $158,000 to settle claims against one of his golf clubs, and $10,000 to purchase a painting of Trump to hang at another of his golf clubs.
The purchase of the painting was an example of one of "at least five self-dealing transactions" which violate tax regulations on non-profit charities, the statement said.
"As our investigation reveals, the Trump Foundation was little more than a cheque book for payments from Mr Trump or his businesses to nonprofits, regardless of their purpose of legality," Underwood said. "This is not how private foundations should function."
The Trump Foundation issued a statement denying the charges and accusing the attorney general of holding its $1.7 million in remaining funds "hostage for political gain".
The lawsuit announced on Thursday was the culmination of a two-year investigation, which began under the previous New York Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, Underwood said.
Schneiderman resigned last month after several former girlfriends accused him of physical abuse.
New York is also seeking $2.8 million of restitution, a 10-year ban on Trump serving as a director of a non-profit in the state, and similar one-year bans for his children Donald Jr, Eric, and Ivanka, who serve on the foundation's board.
Eric Trump distanced himself from his own charitable foundation after the election, the New York Times reported, after it came under investigation by the attorney general for allegedly shifting its resources to the Trump Organization.
The Trump Foundation lawsuit adds to Trump's legal challenges, which include a wide-ranging special counsel investigation into alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Russia. Special Counsel Robert Mueller has indicted several of Trump's associates and raided the home and office of the president's long-time lawyer and fixer, Michael Cohen.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
SC stays demolition notice of Nashik's Dargah, seeks report from Bombay HC on non-listing of plea
New Delhi, Apr 18 (PTI): The Supreme Court has stayed in the interim the demolition notice of the Nashik civic body for razing the Hazrat Saatpeer Sayed Baba dargah and sought a report from the Bombay high court on non-listing of the shrine's plea.
According to the sources, the structure was razed by civic body personnel hours before the court hearing.
The civic body's action against the dargah at Kathe Galli in Nashik was reportedly carried out during the intervening night of April 15 and 16.
The hearing in apex court took place on April 16 noon.
A bench of Justices P S Narasimah and Joymala Bagchi had then noted the petition was filed before the high court on April 7 but not taken up for hearing.
"In the meanwhile, there shall be a stay of notice dated April 1, 2025 issued by the respondent number 1 -Nashik Municipal Corporation as prayed for," the bench ordered and posted the matter on April 21.
The court's "extraordinary measure" came after senior advocate Navin Pahwa, who was representing the dargah management, claimed despite efforts, the matter was not listed in the high court.
"We have taken this extraordinary measure in view of the specific statement of the senior counsel that efforts were made every day for getting the case listed. We are unsure of the statement made and that the high court would not have listed the case despite repeated requests. This is a serious statement and the counsel shall take and feel responsibility for the consequence of such a statement," the bench said in its April 16 order.
The top court then directed the registrar general of the Bombay high court to send a report about the listing of the petition.
The apex court, while seeking response of the Nashik Municipal Corporation, noted Pahwa pointing out an "urgency in this matter" as the property in question, a religious structure, could be demolished.
He submitted that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed before the high court on April 7, 2025, and he had been waiting for the matter to be listed since April 8.
"It is specifically stated that the high court has declined to list the matter ever since," the top court said, recording Pahwa's submission.
The bench added, "We are unable to understand as to what transpired from April 9, till today. Counsel submit that they have been trying every day."
The bench then went on to seek the response of the municipal body and other authorities.
