Not involved in terror activities, they are great people: Here’s how Trump praised Muslim voters
Washington, D.C. — In a campaign rally ahead of Election Day, U.S. President-Elect Donald Trump praised his Muslim supporters, highlighting what he described as a “beautiful movement” of Muslims rallying behind him, particularly in the crucial swing state of Michigan. Trump, who has been elected for a second term following a closely contested election, noted that support from Muslim voters has grown significantly, which he believes contributed to his positive performance in Michigan and potentially other key states.
Addressing the rally, Trump spoke warmly of his Muslim supporters, describing them as peace-oriented and intelligent individuals who seek stability and avoid conflict. “They want peace. They really do. They don't want to be in wars. They're very smart," Trump stated, lauding their character and desire for peaceful coexistence. He attributed the origins of the “Muslims for Trump” movement to a small initiative that quickly gained momentum and blossomed into a voting bloc for him in Michigan.
Trump went on to express his appreciation for the group, describing it as an honor to have their support. He acknowledged their contribution to what he characterized as strong election numbers in Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania — all critical battlegrounds in this election cycle. “And I think they might very well be responsible for the kind of numbers we're showing up in Michigan,” Trump said, adding that similar trends were apparent in other swing states.
In his speech, Trump sought to counter stereotypes and misconceptions about the Muslim community. He emphasized that his Muslim supporters do not condone or engage in extremist activities, but rather are individuals focused on peace and community stability. “They’re not involved in the terror and all the things that are going on. They're great people," he remarked, signaling a shift from his previously contentious rhetoric about Muslims.
Concluding his remarks, Trump expressed hope that this alliance would foster “tremendous cohesion” among Americans of diverse backgrounds, stressing his optimism about the role this support could play in bridging divides. He encouraged members of the "Muslims for Trump" group to stand up at the rally, thanking them for their role in his campaign’s success.
The rally was one of Trump’s last public appearances before Election Day and was seen as part of his strategy to consolidate support from a range of demographic groups, especially in pivotal states. His victory in Michigan, in particular, was seen as a result of his ability to appeal to various communities, including Muslims who may have previously felt alienated by his earlier stances.
Trump's second term as president now awaits inauguration, with his team indicating that his administration will focus on uniting Americans across different backgrounds and faiths, hoping to build on the support seen from groups like "Muslims for Trump."
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Supreme Court expresses 'shock' over Rs 6k-15k pension of ex-HC judges
New Delhi, Nov 7: The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed "shock" over some retired high court judges getting a meagre pension ranging between Rs 6,000 and Rs 15,000.
A bench of Justices B R Gavai, P K Mishra and K V Viswanathan was hearing a petition filed by a retired high court judge who said he was receiving a mere Rs 15,000 pension.
The petitioner, who was elevated as a judge of the Allahabad High Court after serving as a judicial officer in the district court for 13 years, claimed that the authorities had refused to consider his judicial service while computing the pension.
"If there are retired high court judges before us who are getting Rs 6,000 and Rs 15,000 as pension, it is shocking. How can that be?" the bench remarked.
Justice Gavai said the post-retirement facilities for judges differed in each high court and some states provided much better benefits.
The apex court thereafter posted the hearing on November 27.
While hearing a separate plea in March, the apex court had said there cannot be any discrimination in computing the pensionary benefits of retired judges of high courts based on whether they were elevated from the bar or the district judiciary.
Pensionary benefits of a retired high court judge, who was elevated from the district judiciary, should be computed based on his or her last drawn salary as a high court judge, it said.
