UK sees worst riots in 13 years fueled by false rumours; Over 100 arrested
London: England is experiencing its most significant riots in 13 years, sparked by widespread disturbances linked to child murders and anti-immigration protests. The unrest was reportedly ignited by false rumours circulating online that the suspect in a recent mass stabbing was a Muslim and an immigrant. This misinformation fueled anger among far-right supporters, who clashed with anti-racism protesters over the weekend.
The violence erupted following a knife attack at a Taylor Swift-themed dance party in Southport, near Liverpool, where three young girls were fatally stabbed. In response, anti-immigration demonstrators took to the streets, targeting asylum-seeker accommodations. On August 3, a mob attempted to break into a Holiday Inn Express hotel in Nottingham, where asylum seekers were housed.
The rioting has spread across multiple towns and cities, including Liverpool, Manchester, Bristol, Blackpool, Hull, and Belfast. In Rotherham, South Yorkshire, masked demonstrators smashed windows at a hotel used to shelter asylum seekers. The clashes have involved rioters throwing bricks, bottles, and flares at police, resulting in injuries to several officers and damage to shops.
The Police Federation of England and Wales described the unrest as the worst since the 2011 riots, following the police shooting of a mixed-race man in north London. Tiffany Lynch from the Federation stated, "We're now seeing it [trouble] flooding across major cities and towns." In response, the government has mobilized thousands of extra police officers, asserting that law enforcement has "all the resources they need" to address the disorder.
The violence has been exacerbated by disinformation, particularly false claims about 17-year-old suspect Axel Rudakubana, who has been charged with three counts of murder and ten counts of attempted murder. Judge Andrew Menary authorized the identification of Rudakubana, born in Wales to Rwandan parents, to counteract the spread of false information.
National Police Chiefs’ Council's BJ Harrington confirmed the arrest of 147 individuals linked to the violence, with numbers expected to rise. The authorities attribute the escalation to disinformation and have urged the public to verify information before acting.
The protests, often organized online by far-right groups, have adopted slogans like "Enough is enough" and "Stop the boats," reflecting broader anti-immigration sentiments. While some demonstrations have remained peaceful, others have descended into violence, targeting mosques and leading to increased security at Islamic centers.
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemned the unrest as "far-right thuggery" and highlighted that Muslim communities were being targeted. Starmer, recently elected after a decisive Labour victory, announced measures to enhance intelligence sharing, deploy facial-recognition technology, and impose criminal behaviour orders to prevent troublemakers from traveling.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Karnataka Assembly passes bill on Palace Grounds amid opposition protest
Bengaluru, Mar 6 (PTI): The Karnataka Assembly on Thursday passed the Bangalore Palace (Utilisation and Regulation of Land) Bill, reaffirming state ownership over 472 acres and 16 guntas of land here, amid protests by the opposition BJP.
During the discussion, Karnataka Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister H K Patil said the state government would have to provide Rs 200 crore worth of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) for each acre of land, which means that for 15 acres, Rs 3,000 crore worth of TDR would be issued.
“If we accept it, then this 2-km stretch of road will become the costliest road in the world. If we accept it then how are we going to develop the city in later stages? How will you carry out development works?” asked Patil.
He also pointed out that this question was raised not only under the Congress government but also during the previous BJP regime.
However, the BJP-led cabinet has opposed the project.
ALSO READ: Budget session: Law Min. HK Patil introduces Microfinance bill in Karnataka assembly
“Suppose we agree to it then, what will be the valuation of the 472 acres? It will be lakhs and lakhs of crores of rupees. Can we accept?” Patil wondered.
The Minister said the government had previously exercised its executive powers to issue an ordinance, which was approved by the Governor. Now the government is bringing a bill with two amendments.
“In this bill, we have made provisions either to develop or drop the road development work,” Patil explained.
However, BJP state president B Y Vijayendra and BJP MLA Arvind Bellad opposed the move, alleging that the government was targetting Yaduveer Krishna Datta Chamaraja Wadiyar, the scion of the Mysuru royal family, and the BJP MP from Mysuru-Kodagu constituency out of political vendetta.
“We talk of 472 acres of Mysuru Maharaja but here there are many Maharajas who too own 400 acres, 500 acres and thousands of acres of land, which is known to everyone,” Bellad said.
He slammed the Congress government, saying political power should not be misused for personal vendetta.
“Why (the then Deputy Chief Minister) Siddaramaiah brought the law in 1996 pertaining to the Bangalore Palace? Why are you setting eyes on the Bangalore Palace?” he asked.
Vijayendra charged that Wadiyar won the election on BJP ticket so the state government realised that it should acquire it.
“This bill has been brought for political vengeance. We are not discussing whether Rs 3,000 crore is exorbitant or not but the moment Yaduveer became MP, the state government woke up. You should be ashamed. This house should not be used for political vendetta,” he said.
Intervening, Minister Priyank Kharge said Vijayendra should not have raised it because the intention behind building the road was noble.
According to him, the BJP too had the same plan when it was in power.
He sought to know whether thousands of crores of rupees be spent on a road which should have cost significantly less.
In response, BJP MLA B A Basavaraj (Byrathi) said issuing TDR will not be a burden on the state government and appealed to the ruling Congress to reconsider its stance.
Minister Ramalinga Reddy too explained that the Karnataka government acquired the entire land way back in 1996.
The Mysuru royal family went to the High Court, which gave ruling in favour of the state government. The royal family then approached the Supreme Court, where the case is still going on, the Minister pointed out.
“The final judgment is pending in the SC to decide whether the acquisition was right or wrong. If the SC says it’s the royal family’s property then let it be so. If the order is in the state government’s favour then we can take a decision. The bill is only about it,” Reddy explained.
Speaker U T Khader then called for a voice vote and the bill was passed by the Assembly amidst opposition BJP’s discontent.
