New Delhi/Washington: A group of lawmakers from the United States has written to India’s Ambassador to the US, Vinay Kwatra, urging that activist and former Jawaharlal Nehru University student Umar Khalid be granted bail and a fair, timely trial in accordance with international law.

The letter was signed by eight US Representatives, including Jim McGovern and Jamie Raskin. In the communication, the lawmakers expressed concern over what they described as the prolonged pre-trial detention of individuals charged in connection with the February 2020 violence in Delhi, specifically referring to Khalid.

McGovern said he met Khalid’s parents in December and noted that Khalid has been in jail for more than five years without trial. Khalid and several others have been booked under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, along with provisions of the Indian Penal Code, for allegedly being part of a larger conspiracy behind the 2020 Delhi riots, in which 53 people were killed and over 700 injured.

“The US and India share a long-standing strategic partnership that has historically been rooted in democratic values, constitutional governance and strong people-to-people ties,” the lawmakers wrote. They added that as the world’s largest democracies, both countries have a shared interest in protecting freedom, the rule of law, human rights and pluralism.

The lawmakers said they were raising the issue in this spirit, pointing out that several human rights organisations, legal experts and international media outlets have questioned the fairness of the investigation and legal process in Khalid’s case. They noted that Khalid has been denied bail for five years under the UAPA, which, they said, independent human rights experts have warned could contravene international standards related to due process, proportionality and equality before the law.

The US Representatives said they were aware that the matter is currently before the Supreme Court of India and welcomed the recent order granting Khalid temporary bail to attend his sister’s wedding. They urged that he be released on bail for the duration of the court proceedings.

“With respect for India’s democratic institutions and its role as a key partner of the United States, we request that your government share the steps being taken to ensure that the judicial proceedings against Khalid and his co-accused who remain in detention meet international standards,” the letter said.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Jodhpur (PTI): Activist and scientist Sonam Wangchuk, who has been lodged in the Jodhpur Central Jail since September 27, 2025, was taken to AIIMS Jodhpur for medical examination early Saturday morning, officials said.

He spent approximately an hour and a half in the hospital's gastroenterology department before being escorted back to prison.

According to AIIMS sources, Wangchuk has been having stomach-related issues and visited the hospital on Friday as well for tests.

The Supreme Court, which is currently hearing a petition filed by his wife, has requested Wangchuk's medical report by February 2.

Following the Supreme Court's orders, police transported Wangchuk from Jodhpur Central Jail to the emergency department of AIIMS Hospital on Saturday morning, a police official said.

Wangchuk has been voicing concerns about his declining health in jail for some time now. Recognising his worsening condition, the Supreme Court ordered the Jodhpur jail administration on Thursday to arrange for him to be examined by a specialist.

During the Thursday hearing, a bench comprising Justice Arvind Kumar and Justice P B Varale directed jail authorities to ensure that Wangchuk receives an examination by a specialist doctor (a gastroenterologist) at a government hospital.

During the hearing, Additional Solicitor General for the Rajasthan government, K M Nataraj, reported that jail doctors had examined Wangchuk 21 times over the past four months, with the most recent check-up occurring on January 26.

Objecting to this submission, Wangchuk's counsel Kapil Sibal claimed that he was suffering from persistent stomach pain due to the water quality in jail.

Accepting Sibal's argument, the court said that medical treatment with a specialist must be provided in accordance with the patient's needs.