Mumbai: The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) has announced a robust 16.36% increase in its Profit After Tax (PAT) for the first half of the 2026 fiscal year.

The state-owned insurer reported a PAT of Rs. 21,040 crore for the six months ending September 30, 2025, up from Rs. 18,082 crore during the same period last year.

The strong performance was supported by a 12.30% growth in the Value of New Business (VNB), which reached Rs. 5,111 crore. The company's net VNB margin also expanded by 140 basis points, rising to 17.6% from 16.2% in the previous year.

LIC's total premium income saw a 5.14% rise, reaching Rs. 2,45,680 crore for H1 FY26. Its Assets Under Management (AUM) also grew by 3.31% year-on-year to Rs. 57.23 lakh crore.
A key driver of profitability appears to be the corporation's strategic diversification into non-participating (non-par) products. The Annualized Premium Equivalent (APE) from individual non-par products surged by 30.47% to Rs. 6,234 crore. This shift increased the non-par share within the individual business to 36.31% for the half-year, a significant jump from 26.31% in the previous year.

Despite the strong profit growth, LIC reported a 20.83% decrease in the total number of individual policies sold, which fell to 72.61 lakh from 91.70 lakh in the prior year. The Individual New Business Premium income also saw a 3.54% decline.

However, this was offset by a 6.14% increase in Individual Renewal Premium, which grew to Rs. 1,22,224 crore, and a 6.73% rise in Total Group Business Premium. LIC maintains its position as the market leader with an overall market share of 59.41% based on First Year Premium Income (FYPI).

CEO Outlook and Operational Efficiency
LIC also demonstrated improved operational efficiency, with its overall expense ratio decreasing by 146 basis points to 11.28% for the half-year.
Shri R Doraiswamy, CEO & MD of LIC, attributed the results to the successful implementation of the company's strategy regarding product and channel diversification.

"While we have seen the VNB increase by 12.30% in H1 FY26 to Rs 5,111 crore, our VNB margin has also expanded by 140 bps to 17.6% in H1 FY26," Doraiswamy stated.

He also highlighted growth in alternate sales channels, noting that the "Banca and Alternate Channels share of Individual NBP is now 7.12% for H1 FY26 as compared to 4.10% last year, demonstrating a growth of 67.62%". The CEO expressed optimism about recent GST changes for the industry and reaffirmed LIC's commitment to achieving "Insurance for All by 2047".

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Chennai: Journalist and political commentator Sujit Nair has expressed concern over speculation that the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam could explore a post-poll understanding to prevent Vijay-led Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam from forming the government in Tamil Nadu.

In a social media post, Sujit Nair said the election verdict in Tamil Nadu reflected a clear public demand for political change and argued that the mandate should be respected irrespective of political preferences.

Referring to reports and political discussions surrounding a possible understanding between the DMK and AIADMK, he said he hoped such developments remained only speculative conversations and did not turn into reality.

Nair stated that if such an alliance were to take shape, it would raise serious questions about ideological politics in the country. He said TVK had emerged through a democratic electoral process and that the legitimacy to govern in a parliamentary democracy comes from the people’s verdict.

According to him, attempts to prevent an electoral winner from forming the government through unexpected political arrangements may be constitutionally valid, but many people could view them as politically opportunistic.

He further said that such a move could particularly affect the political image of the DMK, which has historically projected itself around ideology, social justice and opposition politics. Nair said that in ideological terms, the DMK appeared closer to TVK than to the AIADMK, and joining hands with its long-time political rival only to remain in power could weaken its broader political narrative.

He added that the same questions would apply to the AIADMK as well, as the party had spent decades positioning itself against the DMK and such an arrangement could create discomfort among its cadre and supporters.

Drawing a comparison with Maharashtra politics in 2019, Nair said he had expressed similar views when the Shiv Sena formed an alliance with the Indian National Congress and the Nationalist Congress Party after the Assembly elections.

He said post-poll alliances between long-standing political rivals often create a public perception that ideology and electoral mandates become secondary when political power equations come into play.

Nair also said such developments increase public cynicism towards politics and reinforce the belief among voters that ideology is often sidelined after elections.

He maintained that the Tamil Nadu verdict was emphatic and said respecting both the spirit and substance of the mandate was important for the credibility of democratic politics.