Assault on dalits with dalit president as cover?
Even as Sangh Parivar tries its best to cover casteism by selling the dream of ‘Hindutva’ as a lofty ideal, the wound is getting deeper with time. It has been proved time and again that wealth, power or office can never really compensate for the caste based discrimination a lower caste person feels in our country.People are getting killed for having ridden a horse on the wedding day, or riding a motorcycle, or for having deskinned a dead cattle, or for entering a temple so on and so forth. If the dalits consolidate against such tyranny, the government does not even hesitate to brand them naxals.
When the government tried amending and thus weakening act that protects dalits such as atrocity act, the dalits came together in solidarity. The government consistently silenced the voices. And amidst all this, the BJP government at the centre repeatedly says “We elevated a dalit to the post of Rashtrapati.” This fact, is really a matter of great pride to India. But then, how difficult it is to assault dalits by having a dalit man as cover?
President Ramnath Kovind has been elevated to the highest chair not just because he is a dalit, but because he has accepted the RSS ideals. He does not accede to Ambedkar’s ideology. A dalit leader can never be able to balance Ambedkar and RSS ideals together. Those ideals can never coexist.
Beyond this, it is an open secret as to what RSS’s stance is about dalits. And yet, if BJP and RSS desperately need a Kovind’s pretext to cover their lacunae, it is to stop dalits from consolidating against BJP and the RSS ideology.
Since they very well understand an upper caste man implementing RSS ideology can be quite dangerous, they need a dalit leader for the job. And hence, Kovind was put in the highest office in the country. If the country celebrates elevation of a dalit to the high office, the underlying agenda is quite disappointing. After him being made the President, cases of assaults against dalits countrywide have increased manifold.
On earlier occasions, assaults against Dalits were pretty individualistic and sporadic too. Assault on dalit consolidations were rare. System would hesitate to launch an assault on them. But in the recent times, upper caste people are consistently attacking dalits as a whole with the help of the legal system.
Sangh parivar members launched organized attacks on dalits during a march to oppose the court ruling, and Bhima-Koregaon march incidents. Whenever such incidents are cited, BJP shows Kovind as its safety net and escapes from serious charges. Which means, BJP will use a dalit against dalits and continue assaulting them.
But then, the real spirit of Manu ideology has come out in the open with the incident that took place in relation to the President in Puri Jagannath temple in Orissa. About two months ago, President Ramnath Kovind had visited the temple with his wife and he was stopped from entering the sanctum sanctorum. His wife was even pushed around. This is a shocking incident. That this incident was kept under wraps for two months is even more surprising for the nation. Now the government has ordered for an inquiry into the incident. This humiliation meted out against the President is an insult to the country.
Government should have immediately initiated some disciplinary action and saved the reputation of both the President and the country at large.
But the government probably deemed it important to save the reputation of the preists over the President. Hence everything was covered up so far. This incident has sent a very disturbing message that no matter how high a Dalit grows, he/she would always be perceived in the perspective of his/her caste and that they wouldn’t be allowed inside the temple.
This also emphasizes on the fact that other dalits also need to learn to swallow their self respect like President Kovind. Many years ago, the case of an MP receiving Prasad outside the premises of the temple had given rise to serious debate. He had even said: “I stood out so that their sentiments are not hurt.”
With that, he had insulted lakhs and crores of dalits. Unfortunately, even within BJP no one protested against this treatment to President Kovind. Even the opposition parties didn’t deem it fit to speak against it. Dalit organisations have also maintained strategic silence over this. Puri incident is a strong example of using dalit as a shield to launch assaults on dalit community. This has also shown the wound of caste is inflicted deep into the minds of this country and this won't be cured anytime soon.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Election rules row: SC allows 3 weeks to EC to respond to plea of Jairam Ramesh, others
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Thursday granted three more weeks to the Election Commission to respond to the pleas of Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh and others against the recent amendments to the 1961 election rules.
A bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar had issued a notice to the Centre and the poll panel on January 15 on Ramesh's plea and sought a response.
Senior advocate Maninder Singh, appearing for the poll panel, sought three more weeks to file the reply.
The bench allowed Singh's prayer and set the July 21 week for hearing.
Aside from Ramesh, two similar PILs filed by Shyam Lal Pal and activist Anjali Bhardwaj are pending.
Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi represented Ramesh.
The petitioners have said the amendments to the 1961 Conduct of Election Rules were made "very cleverly" and barred any access to CCTV footage claiming it would reveal the identity of the voter.
Singhvi previously said voting choices were never revealed and the CCTV footage couldn't reveal votes and urged the bench to ask the poll panel and the Centre to file their responses before the next date of hearing.
Ramesh's plea was filed in December and expressed "hope" that the apex court would help "restore the fast eroding" integrity of the electoral process.
The government has tweaked an election rule to prevent public inspection of certain electronic documents such as CCTV camera and webcasting footage besides video recordings of candidates to prevent their misuse.
"The integrity of the electoral process is fast eroding. Hopefully the Supreme Court will help restore it," Ramesh said.
Based on EC's recommendation, the union law ministry in December amended Rule 93(2)(a) of the 1961 rules, to restrict the type of "papers" or documents open to public inspection.
Bhardwaj, in her separate plea filed through lawyer Prashant Bhushan, challenged the recent amendment to election rules which allegedly restrict public access to election-related records.
The PIL challenges the validity of the Conduct of Elections (Second Amendment) Rules, 2024 and argues the amendment to Rule 93(2)(a) of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 violates Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution by restricting citizens' access to crucial election-related documents.
Prior to the amendment, it was stated, Rule 93(2)(a) provided "all other papers relating to the election shall be open to public inspection".
"The impugned amendment is a blatant violation of Article 19(1)(a) and 21 of the Constitution of India as it brings opaqueness and restricts people's fundamental right to access vital documents and papers related to elections," the plea said.
The amendment, said the plea, sought to narrow and restrict public access to election related records, Rule 93(2)(a) of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 prior to the 2024 amendment.
The new amendment is stated to have modified the provision to "all other papers as specified in these rules relating to the election shall be open to public inspection".
The petitioner argued the change introduced new and arbitrary restrictions on public access, limiting transparency in the electoral process.
The plea said the amendment infringed upon the fundamental right to information enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) and the right to a free and fair election under Article 21.
It claimed the amendment curtailed public scrutiny of election records, leading to reduced transparency and potentially facilitating corrupt practices.
The amendment, the plea said, imposed arbitrary constraints by restricting access to only those records explicitly mentioned in the rules, excluding others without justification.
By limiting access to election documents, the amendment is seen as contrary to the spirit of the RTI Act, which promotes governmental accountability and transparency, it added.
_vb_52_vb_41.jpeg)
