Cong has acquired a long term vision now
A major point that could have been detrimental for the coalition government has been tackled right away. The question whether Kumaraswamy would remain a full term CM could have been a bone of contention if it was not addressed right now. The fact that this question has been answered without giving much space for it to gain different proportions is not only a surprising move, but also a fact that has brought much solace to the people of the state. It was rather inevitable that Congress with its 78 seats would offer the CM post on a platter to JD(S) with 37 seats. But it was somehow assumed that JD(S) and Congress would share the term of CM equally between themselves. Congress even deserved to have a CM of its own party for half the term. Because people’s mandate is favourably leaning towards Congress and the party has a large vote share too. And JD(S) would have been on a beneficial side with this arrangement. However, former PM Deve Gowda turned the whole situation in the favour of his party. And for the first time perhaps, Congress has faced the reality on a very pragmatic note. The party has set its sights on long term benefits of having to let go of the CM’s post for now.
Congress plans to come back in a big way in 2019 elections, hopefully clinching the PM post for itself. The expectations of Congress in the state went haywire, and this has given them a very uncertain feeling about 2019 elections. The party strategy now needs to be stronger than before to face the elections. Hence Congress is forging alliance with smaller parties at every possible opportunity to pose a challenge to NDA in the upcoming elections. That’s the whole reason behind offering CM’s post to HD Kumaraswamy for full term. If JD(S) and Congress can truck together to face elections in the state, the results can be highly favourable. JD(S) will have to return the favour by catapulting Rahul to the post of PM. If JD(S) has entered into coalition with BJP, Kumaraswamy would have probably lost his life time opportunity to be a full term CM! He would have had to share the seat with Yeddyurappa like it happened last time.
And even that would have been tough since the undercurrents of BJP suggest otherwise. Now JD(S) has the opportunity to have its cake and eat it too. Till last time, JD(S) didn’t hope to clinch big number of seats. The results weren’t even promising. Yet, the fact that it is riding over the party with 78 MLAs is a fact that may create discontentment among the Congress members. Hence, soon after coalition government was formed, there were statements about the term of the current CM wasn’t decided yet. But the Delhi high command concurring and announcing full support for HDK’s full term as CM, hasn’t gone down well among the members of Cong. Time can only answer how this entire decision would play out in Lok Sabha elections. This may weaken Congress and strengthen JD(S)’s presence in the state. Now major portfolios have gone to JD(S). Having suffered through demonetization, JD(S) will definitely find this a major resource to spring back to form. HDK as full term CM can work wonders for the confidence of JD(S) members and the party by the time Lok Sabha elections arrive.
But looks like this is a tentative situation since many Cong members have already expressed doubts on HDK’s full term run, and its impact on Congress in the state. Hence the coalition may continue till 2019 elections and then the fight for CM post may assume full form after the elections depending on how well Congress does.
Some members may even quit the party dissatisfied over HDK being given all the power. Hence the probabilities of 2019 elections has definitely raised curiosity in the state. If the allies like it happened in UP join in, BJP may face a tough challenge. But we have also seen how fast the allies have dissipated into thin air in the country. Rahul Gandhi may be the PM candidate in Congress and other parties may have even more experienced seniors much deserving of the post. Hence, it is not impossible for even HD Devegowda to push Rahul aside and occupy the seat himself. The Congress then would have lost the big and small picture both.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
CJI calls for 'unified judicial policy', use of technology to converge practices across courts
Jaisalmer (PTI): Pushing for a "unified judicial policy", Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on Saturday said technology can help align standards and practices across courts, creating a "seamless experience" for citizens, regardless of their location.
He said high courts -- due to the federal structure -- have had their own practices and technological capacities, and "regional barriers" can be broken down with technology to create a more unified judicial ecosystem.
Delivering the keynote address at the West Zone Regional Conference in Jaisalmer, Kant proposed the idea of a "national judicial ecosystem" and called for an overhaul of India's judicial system with the integration of technology.
"Today, as technology reduces geographical barriers and enables convergence, it invites us to think of justice not as regional systems operating in parallel, but as one national ecosystem with shared standards, seamless interfaces, and coordinated goals," he said.
He emphasised how the role of technology in the judiciary has evolved over time.
"Technology is no longer merely an administrative convenience. It has evolved into a constitutional instrument that strengthens equality before the law, expands access to justice, and enhances institutional efficiency," he said, highlighting how digital tools can bridge gaps in the judicial system.
Kant pointed out that technology enables the judiciary to overcome the limitations of physical distance and bureaucratic hurdles.
"It allows the judiciary to transcend physical barriers and bureaucratic rigidities to deliver outcomes that are timely, transparent and principled," he said, adding that the effective use of technology can modernise the delivery of justice and make it more accessible to citizens across the country.
The CJI called for implementing a "unified judicial policy".
He said India's judicial system has long been shaped by its federal structure, and different high courts have their own practices and technological capacities.
"India's vast diversity has led to different high courts evolving their own practices, administrative priorities and technological capacities. This variation, though natural in a federal democracy, has resulted in uneven experiences for litigants across the country," he said.
Kant underscored that predictability is crucial for building trust in the judicial system.
"A core expectation citizens place upon the courts is predictability," he said, adding that citizens should not only expect fair treatment but also consistency in how cases are handled across the country.
He pointed to the potential of technology in improving predictability.
"Technology enables us to track systemic delays and make problems visible rather than concealed," he said.
By identifying areas where delays occur, such as in bail matters or cases involving certain types of disputes, courts can take targeted action to address these issues and improve efficiency, Kant said.
The CJI explained that data-driven tools could identify the reasons behind delays or bottlenecks, allowing for faster, more focused solutions.
"Technology enables prioritisation by flagging sensitive case categories, monitoring pendency in real time and ensuring transparent listing protocols," he said.
Justice Surya Kant also discussed the importance of prioritising urgent cases where delays could result in significant harm. He highlighted his recent administrative order that ensures urgent cases, such as bail petitions or habeas corpus cases, are listed within two days of curing defects.
"Where delay causes deep harm, the system must respond with urgency," he stated, explaining that technology can help courts identify and expedite such cases.
Kant also raised the issue of the clarity of judicial decisions.
He noted that many litigants, despite winning cases, often struggle to understand the terms of their judgment due to complex legal language.
"Although the orders had gone in their favour, they remained unsure of what relief they had actually secured because the language was too technical, vague or evasive to understand," he said.
He advocated for more uniformity in how judgments are written.
"A unified judicial approach must therefore extend to how we communicate outcomes," he said.
The CJI also discussed the role of AI and digital tools in improving case management. He pointed to the potential of AI-based research assistants and digital case management systems to streamline judicial processes.
"Emerging technological tools are now capable of performing once-unthinkable functions. They can highlight missing precedent references, cluster similar legal questions, and simplify factual narration," he said, explaining how these technologies can help judges make more consistent decisions.
He also highlighted tools like the National Judicial Data Grid and e-courts, which are already helping to standardise processes like case filings and tracking.
Kant reiterated that the integration of technology into the judicial process is not just about improving efficiency but about upholding the integrity of the system and strengthening public trust.
"The measure of innovation is not the complexity of the software we deploy, but the simplicity with which a citizen understands the outcome of their case and believes that justice has been served," he said.
