The Nobel Prize needs to regain its credibility
The Nobel Prize, deemed as the most prestigious honour across the globe, has been mired in controversies time and again. Despite its significant cause of identifying the most outstanding personalities whose contribution has been significant to the betterment of the world, the global forces that work behind this committee have always been questioned by people. Many scholars have even rejected this honour. There is definitely some amount of truth in the allegation of Nobel Prize being under the control of imperialist forces. There were roaring discussions when the prize was given to Aung San Suu Kyi and Barack Obama.
The fact that Mahatma Gandhi was denied the Nobel, is a lacunae for the prize itself. Yet, there is no question about the credibility of Nobel to a large extent. This time again, the Nobel Prize is wallowing in controversy. Not for having bestowed the award on someone, but because the award will NOT be given away to any recipient this year. The Swedish origin Academy has declared that the award will not be given in 2018 for literature. And as a compensatory measure, two people will be honoured in 2019 for the same category. In the past, Nobel Prize has been stalled on seven occasions and five times the ceremony has been postponed. But this time around, the reasons are different and a lot concerning too. This issue that is internal to the Academy, has created a rift among its members. The giving away of the award has been stopped over allegations of sexual harassment allegedly done by the spouse of a lady member. Protesting this, eight members among the 18 member committee have submitted their resignation to the committee. In order to regain the credibility of the Nobel Academy, the award ceremony too has been postponed, says the committee.
There are discussions among prestigious circles about the approach to the topic and the decision that has followed. Why should Academy be held responsible for the members and their family’s personal issues? In 1914 when the world was reeling under the first world war the prize was stalled. In 1915, the prize ceremony was postponed again and it was given to French writer Romain Rolland in 1916. The same thing repeated in 1918 too. Swiss writer Carl Spitteler was selected for the award, but the ceremony was postponed in 1919. It could have been the committee’s decision to award one of their own countrymen at a time when the war ended and people were finally happy. In 1935, academy didn’t honour anyone. And the process of selection itself was postponed in 1936 owing to the fact that no persons could reach the parameters fixed by Alfred Nobel, as per the committee. Eugene O`Neill was honoured with the award in 1936. The prize ceremony was postponed again during the second world war in 1940 and 1943. Danish writer Johannes Jensen was accorded with the award in 1945, after the award was postponed for a year in 1944.
Chili poet Gabriela Mistral was awarded with Nobel Prize in 1945. The committee postponed the award for literature since it was unable to find a befitting recipient in 1949. However, William Faulkner was awarded with this honour in 1950, for the year 1949. From then on, the award wasn’t given a miss even a single year. This is the only year in the recent history that the award has been postponed again. There could have been many other reasons for this. And had the academy wished to postpone the award, a reason like the genocide in Syria (other than someone’s inappropriateness) could have sent a strong message to those strong nations that dictate the world. The committee opposing mass murders of the Rohingyas could have saved the world some compassion and an opportunity to introspect. The world is moving towards waging a third world war, with every passing day. Fascist forces are taking over nations and media is losing its freedom. Had the academy responded to this, and stalled the award it could have helped the world. But then, a reason as given by the academy, has only reduced the whole thing to a matter of internal bickering of the members. This has shrunk the dignity of the academy and the selection committee.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Karnataka Milk Federation enters Delhi-NCR, offers competitive pricing on Nandini products
New Delhi, Nov 21: Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Thursday launched the Karnataka Milk Federation's (KMF) Nandini brand milk products in the Delhi-NCR market, pricing them marginally lower than competitors to gain a foothold in the region.
The cooperative will retail four cow milk variants, curd, and buttermilk from Friday, with competitive pricing that undercuts established players like Mother Dairy and Amul.
Cow milk will be sold at Rs 56 per litre, full Cream Milk at Rs 67 per litre, Standardised Milk at Rs 61 per litre, Toned Milk at Rs 55 per litre, and curd at Rs 74 per kg.
"We have surplus milk in the state. KMF along with Mandya Milk Union will market surplus milk of 3-4 lakh litres per day in Delhi-NCR," Siddaramaiah told reporters after launching the products.
The federation currently collects 100 lakh litres of milk daily, with local consumption at 60 lakh litres, leaving a surplus of 40 lakh litres for expansion into new markets.
However, the Chief Minister acknowledged the challenges of transporting milk over 2,500 km, which takes 50-54 hours.
There is a need to find new markets for surplus milk and gradually the KMF should be able to sell 5-6 lakh litres per day in Delhi-NCR, he added.
KMF Chairman LBP Bheemanaik assured that milk quality would be maintained during transit.
The federation has already partnered with 40 dealers in the Delhi-NCR region to facilitate sales, he added.
With a robust infrastructure of 26.76 lakh milk producers, 15,737 dairy cooperative societies, and 15 district milk unions, KMF has a turnover of Rs 25,000 crore and exports dairy products to over 25 countries.
State Animal Husbandry Minister K Venkatesh and Agriculture Minister N Cheluvarayaswamy were present at the product launch.
ದೇಶದ ಹಾಲು ಉತ್ಪಾದನೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಗುಜರಾತ್ ಮೊದಲ ಸ್ಥಾನದಲ್ಲಿದ್ದರೆ, ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಎರಡನೇ ಸ್ಥಾನದಲ್ಲಿದೆ.
— Siddaramaiah (@siddaramaiah) November 21, 2024
ದೆಹಲಿ ನಗರದಲ್ಲಿ ಕೆ.ಎಂ.ಎಫ್ ಮತ್ತು ಮಂಡ್ಯ ಹಾಲು ಒಕ್ಕೂಟಗಳು ಸೇರಿಕೊಂಡು ವಿವಿಧ ಶ್ರೇಣಿಯ ಹಾಲನ್ನು ಮಾರುಕಟ್ಟೆಗೆ ಬಿಡುಗಡೆ ಮಾಡಿವೆ. ದೆಹಲಿಯ ನಿವಾಸಿಗಳಿಂದ ನಂದಿನಿ ಉತ್ಪನ್ನಗಳಿಗೆ ಅತ್ಯುತ್ತಮ ಸ್ಪಂದನೆ ದೊರೆಯಲಿದೆ ಎಂಬ ವಿಶ್ವಾಸ ನನಗಿದೆ.… pic.twitter.com/yUmTQknGzD
