Political interference compromising credibility of higher offices
Recent developments have cast doubts on the integrity of higher offices. The government, in its need to make things work according to its whims, has been blatantly interfering with the functioning of the various offices thus leading to erosion of their reputation. This discussion started when Modi govt made use of Army for political purposes. This trend is entirely new to India that a government would shield itself behind Army and prompt Army officers to speak good about the ruling dispensation.
Eventually, things reached a stage where the keepers of law, justices sitting in supreme court, had to register their apprehensions against the CJI. If the legal system loses its objectivity, how far behind are other agencies? Who would protect democracy if the very pillar of democracy collapses? Supreme court didn’t manage its neutral image well even when the Vice President rejected impeachment charges. Petitioners had argued that since this case was about questioning the neutrality of CJI, he should not be allowed to choose members of the bench to hear this matter. The petition was withdrawn since the most basic tenet of law was broken by the CJI.
This has raised many doubts about the functioning of the Supreme Court that has to uphold democracy and has compromised the very foundation of this country’s most important pillar of functioning. This has not just cast aspersions on the functioning of highest office of legal system in the country, but the parliament has also failed in bringing most pertinent issues to discussion and frame new policies to safeguard the sovereignty of the country.
For instance, Lok Sabha worked for only 33.6 hours among 28 days during budget session, and could pass only 2 bills in the 14 minutes it could find to pass. The 2018-19 budget was passed without any discussion. Speaker denied permission for the opposition parties to show no trust vote against the BJP. PM Modi has to ensure the discussions happen among his colleagues. But on the contrary, he and his cabinet members had staged a day-long dharna opposing the non-coperation of opposition parties.
Ironically enough, this was some gesture to overcome criticism against his authoritarian behaviour. Now, the government is literally running without a finance minister since some time. The thinkers within BJP are ruing the state it has reached within the government. Though Reserve Bank would ideally form economic policies, it gave its complete concurrence to central government to demonetize currency notes in the recent past.
About 99% of the currency was returned to the banks. But about 100 people had lost lives in the meantime. The country still continues to suffer the result of demo on the country’s economy. The Election Commission has to work neutrally without any black spots on its name if democracy has to work to the best of its abilities. But in the recent past, whether it is postponing Gujarat elections or disqualifying AAP MLAs without hearing their case, EC has been proving it is after all a caged parrot who sings the tune of its owner. The saving grace was Delhi high court which heard the case and cancelled the earlier order of disqualification.
Deemed as independent, many agencies have been compromised with as far as their functioning goes. For instance, since the Chennai High Court couldn’t decide on the legality or the lack of it, of disqualification of 18 MLAs, it seemed like the government was running its show illegally. Now Chennai High court gave a mixed verdict. Hence, the whole matter has now reached a quagmire. In a democratic set up, when all else fails, one can always rely on judicial system to serve justice. But with even judicial system being compromised on, we surely are living in those dark days of undeclared emergency.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Assam to lift all cases against Koch Rajbongshis in Foreigners' Tribunals: CM Himanta Biswa Sarma
Guwahati, Apr 4 (PTI): The Assam cabinet has decided to lift all cases pending against people from the Koch Rajbongshi community in the Foreigners' Tribunals, Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said on Friday.
They will also no longer carry the tag of 'D' or doubtful voters, he said.
''There are 28,000 cases pending in different Foreigners' Tribunals in the state against people of the community. The cabinet has taken a historic decision of lifting the cases with immediate effect,'' Sarma said at a press conference here after the cabinet meeting.
The government believes that the Koch Rajbongshis are an indigenous community of the state and they are an inextricable part of ''our social and cultural fabric'', he asserted.
The people of this community are poor and have suffered a lot over the years, he said.
''They will no longer carry the tag of foreigners or ‘D’ voters,'' the CM said.
Foreigners Tribunals are quasi-judicial bodies, particularly in Assam, established to determine if a person residing in India is a "foreigner" as defined by the Foreigners Act of 1946, based on the Foreigners (Tribunals) Order of 1964.
These tribunals are designed to address matters related to citizenship and the presence of “foreigners” in India, specifically focusing on cases where someone is suspected of being an illegal immigrant.
There are 100 Foreigners’ Tribunals across Assam.
The Koch Rajbongshis have a sizeable presence in Assam, West Bengal, Meghalaya, and parts of Bangladesh, Nepal, and Bhutan, and they demand Scheduled Tribe status.
