Supreme Court shouldn't fail people's trust
Supreme Court is the lone pillar that can uphold the democracy under all circumstances because it can always insist on measures that can rectify to set the country on the track of democracy when legislative or executive goes on a different track.
The court has to caution the government when when it does not work to uphold the democratic values. After Narendra Modi's NDA government came into power, people are forced to place all their hopes on Supreme Court decisions to uphold their interest.
Misuse of Election Commission, interference in CBI and Army, series of fake encounters in Gujarat, reservation etc, there are way too many issues that are awaiting a final sentence by SC to reach conclusion while upholding democracy.
These are the issues that will decide the future of the country. Apart from all those that cases, just as the government's decisions are coming under scanner, the cases that are reaching the doorstep of Supreme Court are increasing rapidly. Now under such circumstances, if there is a situation where the supreme court's credibility becomes questionable, who would save the democracy of the nation?
This question is not being raised by general public, but by persons who held the most responsible position in the Supreme Court, a justice has such concerns now.
Former justice Joseph Kurien has made these observations and this seems to be a case of the fence eating the crop.
In a recent statement to the media, Kurien has said Justice Deepak Misra was influenced by external elements in the recent times and that was detrimental to the Supreme Court since the highest legal institution seemed to have lost track with respect to some very significant cases. One cannot dismiss those words as the rant of a retired person. He had revealed these facts with his colleagues even when he was serving in the court.
This was made evident in a press conference some of the justices held on earlier occasion. This wasn't a personal grouse one held against another colleague. Few of Dipak Misra's colleagues had voiced their concern to the chief justice himself when he held the office. Their main complaint was that Misra was handing over very significant cases to some junior judges without any experience in handling them.
When Misra didn't heed to their words, they were forced to call a press conference. It was for the first time in the history of Supreme Court and the country that such a press conference was held ever.
Politically too, this press meet had created some ripples and Misra seemed to have rectified his stand after that only to some extent, as per Kurien.
Kurien has made another explosive statement now.
His allegation is that Misra was being influenced by external forces.
But he is hesitant to reveal the sources of those ‘forces’. However, guessing what those forces' could be, is anybody's guess.
While people trusted Supreme Court could control the unhindered run of politicians, justice Deepak Misra kneeled before the very legislative.
A weakened judiciary is the reason behind unhindered and unhesitant execution of dictatorial conduct and implementation is unconstitutional measures by Narendra Modi government.
If some of the judges hadn't spoken against this, the future would have been even more scary. If a person who occupies the highest post in judiciary becomes subservient to the ruling dispensation?
And how does one have faith that they'd be served with justice when the Prime Minister works to his convenient and not by the book.
If the other judges had kept silent, future would have been darker than we'd like to assume. At the same time anti constitutional forces are getting bolder with time in India. At a time like this, Kurien's allegations have shows a new reality that doesn't look very bright.
At the same time if Supreme Court also gives anti-constitutional viewpoint through it's judgements, there might be judgements that would even be against the very constitution we believe in.
Manusmriti might take the place of constitution in the coming days using the judiciary route. A sword of fake encounter is hanging on the neck of PM's Man Friday. But for him to be punished, the judiciary needs to retain its independence. If not, people on the guise of policeman may commit murders and Judiciary may be forced to offer their respects to him. Ram Janma Bhoomi and Babri Masjid are the big bones of contention to the country. No one can serve justice to this case except for supreme Court.
At the same time, allegations on the court by a former justice are not very bright. Anybody who cares for democracy needs to come together now to create awareness among people about Misra's leniency towards some particular ideology which is against the spirit of law and constitution. Through this, we also need to uphold the values of democracy.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Inappropriate for MLAs seeking free IPL tickets, says D.K. Suresh
Bengaluru: Bengaluru Milk Union Ltd President D.K. Suresh on Monday said it is inappropriate for MLAs to seek free IPL tickets, adding that those interested in watching matches should pay for them personally.
Speaking to reporters near his residence in Sadashivanagar, he said, “IPL is a commercial tournament and does not represent the country. It is not right for public representatives to focus too much on such matters.”
Referring to the recent controversy during the RCB celebrations, he said, “let us find out who benefited the most from the statements made during the incident.” He also pointed out that BJP MLAs had received IPL tickets as well.
Responding to discussions about relocating the Chinnaswamy Stadium, Suresh said the government has already approved the construction of a new stadium at a location he had proposed.
“I had suggested building a stadium in Surya City and submitted a proposal for it. Bengaluru needs four stadiums in four directions to cater to its growing population and encourage youth participation in sports,” he said.
He noted that apart from Kanteerava Stadium, KSCA, and the Football Stadium, there are limited facilities in the city.
“When I was a Lok Sabha member, I had proposed allocating 100 acres in my constituency at Surya City. The land was later earmarked and the plan approved,” he added.
Suresh said he has discussed the project with Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan, Rajiv Gandhi Housing Corporation Chairman Shivalingegowda, and Anekal MLA Shivanna.
“The Cabinet has now approved the project, and a stadium will be developed on around 50–60 acres,” he said.
He further added that he has requested the Deputy Chief Minister to build another stadium at Shivarama Karanth Layout through the BDA, where 40 acres have been allocated. Plans are also being discussed to develop a well-equipped stadium in Bidadi.
Commending state government's recent bilingual policy move, Suresh said forcing children to learn three languages could affect their comprehension.
“It is a good decision to make two languages compulsory. Learning a third language should be left to the choice of students and parents,” he said.
Responding to criticism from BJP leaders, he said their tendency is to oppose every decision of the government.
“To please their central leadership, they take a pro-Hindi stance. Instead, they should advocate for the adoption of Kannada in all states,” he said.
When asked about the earlier three-language policy under Congress, he said, “the situation is different now. Today, the focus should be on quality learning. Kannada should remain the primary language, while students and parents can choose an additional language.”
