Supreme Court shouldn't fail people's trust
Supreme Court is the lone pillar that can uphold the democracy under all circumstances because it can always insist on measures that can rectify to set the country on the track of democracy when legislative or executive goes on a different track.
The court has to caution the government when when it does not work to uphold the democratic values. After Narendra Modi's NDA government came into power, people are forced to place all their hopes on Supreme Court decisions to uphold their interest.
Misuse of Election Commission, interference in CBI and Army, series of fake encounters in Gujarat, reservation etc, there are way too many issues that are awaiting a final sentence by SC to reach conclusion while upholding democracy.
These are the issues that will decide the future of the country. Apart from all those that cases, just as the government's decisions are coming under scanner, the cases that are reaching the doorstep of Supreme Court are increasing rapidly. Now under such circumstances, if there is a situation where the supreme court's credibility becomes questionable, who would save the democracy of the nation?
This question is not being raised by general public, but by persons who held the most responsible position in the Supreme Court, a justice has such concerns now.
Former justice Joseph Kurien has made these observations and this seems to be a case of the fence eating the crop.
In a recent statement to the media, Kurien has said Justice Deepak Misra was influenced by external elements in the recent times and that was detrimental to the Supreme Court since the highest legal institution seemed to have lost track with respect to some very significant cases. One cannot dismiss those words as the rant of a retired person. He had revealed these facts with his colleagues even when he was serving in the court.
This was made evident in a press conference some of the justices held on earlier occasion. This wasn't a personal grouse one held against another colleague. Few of Dipak Misra's colleagues had voiced their concern to the chief justice himself when he held the office. Their main complaint was that Misra was handing over very significant cases to some junior judges without any experience in handling them.
When Misra didn't heed to their words, they were forced to call a press conference. It was for the first time in the history of Supreme Court and the country that such a press conference was held ever.
Politically too, this press meet had created some ripples and Misra seemed to have rectified his stand after that only to some extent, as per Kurien.
Kurien has made another explosive statement now.
His allegation is that Misra was being influenced by external forces.
But he is hesitant to reveal the sources of those ‘forces’. However, guessing what those forces' could be, is anybody's guess.
While people trusted Supreme Court could control the unhindered run of politicians, justice Deepak Misra kneeled before the very legislative.
A weakened judiciary is the reason behind unhindered and unhesitant execution of dictatorial conduct and implementation is unconstitutional measures by Narendra Modi government.
If some of the judges hadn't spoken against this, the future would have been even more scary. If a person who occupies the highest post in judiciary becomes subservient to the ruling dispensation?
And how does one have faith that they'd be served with justice when the Prime Minister works to his convenient and not by the book.
If the other judges had kept silent, future would have been darker than we'd like to assume. At the same time anti constitutional forces are getting bolder with time in India. At a time like this, Kurien's allegations have shows a new reality that doesn't look very bright.
At the same time if Supreme Court also gives anti-constitutional viewpoint through it's judgements, there might be judgements that would even be against the very constitution we believe in.
Manusmriti might take the place of constitution in the coming days using the judiciary route. A sword of fake encounter is hanging on the neck of PM's Man Friday. But for him to be punished, the judiciary needs to retain its independence. If not, people on the guise of policeman may commit murders and Judiciary may be forced to offer their respects to him. Ram Janma Bhoomi and Babri Masjid are the big bones of contention to the country. No one can serve justice to this case except for supreme Court.
At the same time, allegations on the court by a former justice are not very bright. Anybody who cares for democracy needs to come together now to create awareness among people about Misra's leniency towards some particular ideology which is against the spirit of law and constitution. Through this, we also need to uphold the values of democracy.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao condemns removal of sacred thread during CET
Bengaluru (PTI): The controversy over the alleged removal of sacred threads and other religious symbols during the KCET examination intensified on Saturday, with Karnataka Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao condemning the act as "inhuman" and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad demanding strict action, calling it a violation of religious rights.
Reacting to the incident at Krupanidhi College in Madivala, the Minister said the government had taken note of the matter and assured transparent action, even as police have registered a case and initiated an investigation.
“The inhuman act of asking students to remove their ear studs, bangles, hijab or sacred thread, and even cutting long sleeves with scissors thereby affecting their morale is unacceptable and condemnable,” Rao said in a post 'X'.
He asserted that examination centres must test students’ knowledge and not undermine their dignity, adding that the government would take stringent steps to prevent recurrence.
The Minister also urged affected students not to lose confidence, saying the government stood firmly with them.
Meanwhile, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Karnataka South, strongly condemned the incident, alleging that it had hurt the religious rights and self-respect of the Hindu community.
“The incident of students removing and cutting off their Janivaras during the CET examination has violated the religious rights, culture and self-respect of the Hindu community,” the organisation said in a press note.
Calling the sacred thread a symbol of religious heritage and dignity, it said, “Society will not tolerate any act that insults it,” and demanded a thorough probe and stringent action against those responsible.
It also pointed out that similar incidents had been reported in the state last year, terming the recurrence “unfortunate and condemnable.”
The organisation further alleged that such incidents were damaging the well-being of society and claimed that some schools and colleges are promoting hatred against the Hindu society.
The row erupted after students alleged that invigilators at the examination centre asked them to remove religious symbols, including the sacred thread, during the Common Entrance Test (CET).
Following the incident, an invigilator was suspended and police 'secured' three staff members for questioning.
The CET is conducted for admission to professional courses across the state.
