Why we shouldn’t compare Tablighi congregation and Kumbh Mela?
The coronavirus is back in the news all over the country. The common man is anxious and confused. While politicians are conducting major election rallies, people have been prevented from earning wages for their food. Nobody seems to have a problem with election rallies during the day. But if people venture out in their cars or bikes after 10 pm, they are stopped and tortured. At the same time, the government is relaxing the regulations for the Maha Kumbh Mela.
The government that has been warning about the imposition of the lockdown in the country is at the same time allowing a huge congregation of people in the name of Kumbh Mela. The media that had branded the Tablighi convention as the ‘Coronavirus convention’ is now silent about the Kumbh Mela. If Kumbh Mela were to be compared to the movie, Bahubali, the Tablighi convention can be regarded as a five-minute short film. “The Tablighi convention took place when there was no adequate information and awareness about the Coronavirus while Kumbhamela is taking place when all of us are aware about the impact of the coronavirus”, a popular Bollywood director tweeted. And his words are nothing wrong. When the Tablighi convention was organized, the organizers did not have any information about the Coronavirus. And the government had not issued any order or guidelines about the coronavirus.
We could have condemned the Tablighi convention if it was organized by flouting any guidelines or orders. In the absence of any such violations, several cases were registered against the organizers of the convention. Similarly, the media spread rumours about the workers. By spreading lies such as about the Tablighis spitting on doctors, the media tried hard to prove that the Coronavirus spread because of this.
But finally, the courts dropped all charges against the organizers and took the media to task for spreading rumours vilifying the Tablighis. As against these, the Kumbh Mela is a clearer case. Most importantly, the Tablighi convention was not a public mela. The number of people who have gathered at the Kumbhamela is much larger than those who participated in the Tablighi convention. The fact that an indirect lockdown has been imposed in several cities including Mumbai due to the Coronavirus and at the same time the government has itself gathered crores of people in Uttarakhand has confused people. It has made people view the government’s decisions with suspicion.
If the Coronavirus does not spread when crores of people gather in Kumbh Mela, how does it spread in buses or trains? Kumbh Mela is in no way indispensable for people and people have not demanded that Kumbh Mela be organized at any cost.
Despite this, if the government is keen to gather crores of people, why should people suffer due to the curfew imposed by the government? Ironically, Uttarakhand Chief Minister Rawat has said that the Tablighi convention should not be compared to the Kumbh Mela. There is a truth in his saying. The Tablighi convention does not compare to the disaster of Kumbh Mela. Rawat has issued a hollow defense about the Kumbh Mela saying ‘the Tablighi convention took place indoors while the Kumbh Mela is taking place on the banks of a river.”
If it is true that the Coronavirus spreads only in rooms and not in public places, why was lockdown imposed for three months in public places and why were people confined within four walls? Why are the police attacking those who wander on the streets late in the night? The greatest tragedy is his statement that “Goddess Ganga will save devotees from the coronavirus.” The Central government has spent thousands of crores of rupees to protect Goddess Ganga. She has become completely maligned unable to carry the weight of the sins of her devotees.
Experts have already submitted a report that the water of Ganga is not fit for consumption. The water of Ganga has become poisonous either due to the dirt thrown by devotees or the effluents discharged from factories. Even though efforts are being made to cleanse the Ganga, the government has not succeeded in its efforts. It is not about the Ganga rescuing devotees; the Ganga should be rescued from the devotees. In fact, it is possible that the Ganga might curse devotees for abusing it during the Kumbhamela. For Haj yatra that happens at the international level, the government there imposed severe restrictions. Although it is generally very well-organized with stringent regulations, it was not allowed when the virus was on the rampage. Strict regulations have been imposed for Ramzan Umra as well.
The government took these decisions as it was concerning the people. Here, in India, by imposing lockdown and night curfew for the working class, the Indian government has made the Coronavirus a joke. All chief ministers are repeatedly issuing statements that people should comply with regulations. But people have started questioning why they should not participate in daily activities when crores of people can gather in a mela. People have lost confidence regarding the orders of the government. It is only because of the inconsistencies of the government that the spread of Coronavirus is increasing by the day. The government should take complete responsibility for this. The duality in the decisions of the government about the coronavirus, lockdown, curfew, and safe distancing is why the country has reached this stage. The government that has still not learnt its lessons is continuing its dual policies and is taking the country on the path of destruction.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
AIMPLB plans to challenge Waqf Bill in court, calls it a 'black law'
New Delhi(PTI): The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), a major organisation representing Muslims in India, on Wednesday said it will challenge the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in court, calling it a "black law" that threatens the rights of the community.
The Waqf legislation is being taken up for debate and passage in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. If passed by the Lower House, the bill will be tabled in the Rajya Sabha.
Criticising the bill at a press conference, AIMPLB member Md Adeeb claimed it is an attempt to seize the properties of the Muslim community.
"They have started this spectacle thinking they can take away our property. Can this be accepted? Do not think that we are defeated," Adeeb said, emphasising that the fight against the bill is just a beginning.
Stating that the bill was opposed during deliberations in the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) set up to review it, Adeeb said, "It should not be assumed that we have lost the battle. We have just begun. This is a fight to save the country because the proposed law endangers the very fabric of India."
Adeeb, who urged all conscientious citizens to resist the bill, reaffirmed the AIMPLB's commitment to oppose the proposed legislation both legally and through public demonstrations.
"We will go to court. We will not rest until this law is withdrawn," he said.
AIMPLB spokesperson Mohammad Ali Mohsin said, "We have started this fight because we want to save the country. Our aim is to put an end to this black law."
The board members also hinted at nationwide protests, drawing parallels with the farmers' agitation.
"We will organise programmes across the country just like the farmers did. If needed, we will block roads and take all peaceful measures to oppose the bill," Mohsin said.
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill aims to amend an 1995 Act governing Waqf properties in India. The amendments, the Centre has said, are aimed at improving the management of Waqf properties in the country.
The bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha in August last year, after which it was referred to the Joint Parliamentary Committee, which examined it and submitted a report in February this year.
The contentious changes in the bill include the provision for non-Muslim members in the Central Waqf Council and Waqf boards. Also, any government property identified as Waqf will cease to be Waqf and the district collector will determine their ownership.
The opposition parties, including the Congress, have opposed the legislation, claiming the panel formed to examine the bill did not consider the suggestions put forward by the opposition MPs.
They also accused the Centre of rushing the bill.
