Bail denied for three accused in Kudupu mob lynching case
Court cites heinous nature of crime, tampering concerns
Mangaluru: The Second Additional District and Sessions Judge of Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru, Sri. Jagadeesh V.N., today rejected the bail petitions of three individuals seeking release in connection with the mob lynching incident in Kudupu on April 27, 2025. The order, issued in Crl.Misc./457/2025, pertains to petitioners Saideep (29), Anil Kumar (31) and Yathiraj (27), who were seeking regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
The case stems from Crime No. 37/2025 registered at the Mangaluru Rural Police station for offences punishable under Sections 103 (2), 115 (2), 189 (2), 191 (1), 191 (3), 240 read with Section 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
The advocate for the petitioners argued that the incident occurred in a mob setting after the unknown person raised a slogan. He contended that the petitioners never specifically assaulted the deceased as alleged.
He also highlighted that an UDR case was initially registered, suggesting the subsequent case was false. The counsel further pointed out that the complaint only mentioned that the gathered individuals assaulted the person with their hands. He also brought to the court's attention that the same court had already granted bail to some other accused persons facing similar accusations, arguing that the present petitioners should be treated similarly.
The Special Public Prosecutor opposed the bail petition, stating that the incident constituted communal violence. SPP argued that the complainant clearly named the petitioners as being involved in the assault with hands and sticks. The provisional postmortem report indicated that the death was caused by blunt force injuries. The prosecution further submitted that the investigation revealed mobile phones of the accused were recovered, containing recordings and photographs of the incident.
These were analysed, allegedly showing the petitioners assaulting the deceased. Call records also reportedly placed the petitioners at the scene.
The Investigating Officer's report, submitted by the prosecution, claimed that before the assault, the deceased was stripped naked. Photographs reportedly showed the accused assaulting the naked person with clubs and hands. The report also alleged that after the assault, the deceased was taken near a railway track and disposed of to destroy evidence and facilitate the filing of a 'C' report (closure report) by the police.
The Investigating Officer also indicated that some absconding accused, some who were released on bail, and some who were not yet arrested had attempted to destroy evidence and tamper with prosecution witnesses. The prosecution argued that releasing the petitioners on bail at this stage would undoubtedly lead to further witness tampering and the commission of similar offenses, thus hindering the ongoing investigation.
After hearing both sides and examining the records, the court formulated two points for consideration: 1. Whether the petitioners had presented reasonable grounds to be enlarged on bail? and 2. What order should be passed? The court's finding on the first point was "Negative," leading to the order of rejection.
While acknowledging that the court had previously granted bail to some accused facing similar allegations, the judge emphasised that the subsequent investigation revealed the offense to be a "heinous offence" committed by a gang. The court found the investigating agency's apprehension of witness tampering and hindrance to further investigation to be "acceptable" given the material presented.
The court also noted that police custody of some accused had been obtained for further investigation, and the investigating agency still needed to collect significant evidence to reach a logical conclusion. Based on the evidence currently on record, the court concluded that there was a prima facie case against the petitioners. Given the gravity and seriousness of the offense, the court deemed it not a fit case to exercise the discretion of granting bail under Section 483 of B.N.S.S.
Consequently, the court rejected the bail petition filed by Saideep, Anil Kumar and Yathiraj.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Experience comes when you play bigger teams in bilateral series: Rashid Khan
Chennai (PTI): Afghanistan skipper Rashid Khan called for more bilateral series against stronger cricketing nations after his team signed off from the T20 World Cup on a high, defeating Canada in their final group match here on Thursday.
Afghanistan played some exhilarating cricket, going down to South Africa in a gripping second Super Over after the scores were tied, a humdinger that provided one of the early thrills of the World Cup.
However, the spin-bowling stalwart said Afghanistan could make significant strides if they get regular opportunities to compete against stronger cricketing nations.
"Couple of areas to improve, with the batting, the middle order got a bit stuck against the big teams, and then with the bowling the death overs. That comes when you play the bigger teams in bilateral series," said Rashid after his team defeat Canada by 82 runs, with him returning excellent figures of 2 for 19.
The stalwart said the side had arrived well prepared for the tournament and produced some breathtaking cricket, but admitted the narrow defeat to South Africa proved costly and remained a painful setback.
"We were well-prepared (for the tournament), we played some unbelievable cricket. The game against South Africa, that really hurt everyone. We had to win one of those (first two) games and see how the tournament unfolded. We'll take some positive things from this World Cup and look forward," he said.
With head coach Jonathan Trott set to part ways with the team, Rashid described the departure as an "emotional" moment for the side.
"I think we had some wonderful times with him. Where we are now, he played a main role. It's emotional to see him leave us, but that's how life is. We wish him all the best and somewhere down the line we see him again."
Ibrahim Zadran, who was named Player of the Match for his unbeaten 95 off 56 balls, said it was satisfying to finally register a substantial score after two below-par outings.
"I enjoyed it, didn't play better cricket in first two innings, which I expect. Wanted to back my skills, really enjoyed it. Pressure was there, it's there all the time. I want to put myself in pressure situations and enjoy it," said Zadran.
"Wanted to play positive cricket, rotate strike and punish bad ball, create partnerships and this is what I have done."
