Vajpayee Was BJP’s Nehru: How Newspapers Paid Tribute to Former PM
A nationalist, a gifted orator and the Bharatiya Janata Party’s Jawaharlal Nehru – here’s what the Indian newspapers had to say about Atal Bihari Vajpayee who passed away on Thursday, 16 August. International media, too, paid their tribute to the nonagenarian – calling him “instrumental in strengthening India’s international ties”.
Here are our top picks.
Liberal and Nationalist: Who Shaped Vajpayee’s Persona?
Vajpayee’s sin was that he had crafted the early BJP as a secular, socialist legatee of the Janata party; he had also opposed the Ayodhya movement. It was Advani who was the RSS’s choice for PM for the 1996 elections. But in November 1995 in Bombay, Advani announced Vajpayee as the prime ministerial candidate – to the astonishment of those on stage, and dismay of the RSS. From then on, Vajpayee could not be toppled – becoming prime minister in 1996, 1998, and in 1999 – while Advani withdrew to number two.
– Vinay Sitapati, The Indian Express
Atal Bihari Vajpayee: A Gifted Orator Whose Stories Always Had a Sting in the Tail
Vajpayee’s oratory was legendary. He had the ability to craft a compelling story out of nothing and hold his audiences spellbound. What people looked out for was not what he spoke on but whether there was a usual small sting in the tail. I recall a national council meeting in Jaipur just before the 1991 election when the talk was on an impending Ram toofan. “The problem with the toofan,” he rued “is that we have to be careful not to get blown over ourselves.” Then, with the cryptic tone the party had come to associate with him, added: “The BJP is not a dharma sabha. It is a political party.” The remarks said it all.
– Swapan Dasgupta, The Times of India
Why Atal Bihari Vajpayee Was the BJP’s Pandit Nehru
As PM, Vajpayee recalled in a speech in Parliament how he got restored in South Block’s corridor a portrait of Nehru he would notice while walking in, during his years in the Opposition. “I just had to ask as who removed it and the portrait was back at the assigned place,” the BJP veteran remarked. He never shied of wearing as a badge his admiration of Nehru – and the latter’s fondness of him as a young leader who could be PM one day.
– Vinod Sharma, Hindustan Times
Vajpayee: A Colossus, Unaided by Machines
...It would not be an exaggeration to say that when the news of the former Prime Minister's death was finally announced this evening, millions of Indians – including those who do not and never have subscribed to the ideology of the RSS or the BJP – felt a genuine sense of loss and grief. Only true mass leaders with that indefinable quality called charisma, unaided by the modern-day publicity machine of 24/7 television and relentless social media chatter, can evoke such emotions among vast swathes of people who never met them.
- Manini Chatterjee, The Telegraph
Atal Bihari Vajpayee Created a Peace Template for the Subcontinent
Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s most enduring legacy as Prime Minister is that he attempted to liberate India from the prison of the past with regard to two of the most intractable historical problems – Kashmir and Pakistan. That he did not succeed is evident. Indeed, when he demitted office in May 2004 after failing to win a renewed mandate in the elections to the 14th Lok Sabha, any lasting solution to the Kashmir issue, or to normalisation of India-Pakistan relations, seemed a long way off, even though some footprints of progress made during his tenure in office were undeniably visible.
– Sudheendra Kulkarni, The Hindu
Mr Vajpayee – the Face of the World’s Most Populous Democracy
A published poet, Mr Vajpayee dabbled in law, journalism and rebellion against British colonialism as a young man. A leader of the Hindu nationalist opposition to the once-invincible Indian National Congress party of Gandhi and Nehru, for most of his 50 years in politics he was virtually unknown outside India.
But for six years in his late 70s, Mr Vajpayee was the face of the world’s most populous democracy, a nation of one billion whose ethnic, religious and regional conflicts had fomented massacres, three wars with Pakistan and internal strife for a half-century after independence from Britain in 1947.
– The New York Times
Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Prime Minister Who Made India a Nuclear Power
In 1951, Mr Vajpayee joined the newly formed political party called the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the predecessor of the BJP. Later, he became the party’s leader and began a long parliamentary career. He served as foreign minister in the late 1970s in a coalition government. Under Mr Vajpayee’s leadership, the old Bharatiya Jana Sangh was reborn as the BJP in 1980.
An orator who peppered his speeches with wit and lines from his own poems, Mr Vajpayee was viewed more as a kind of philosopher-king and less as a hard-nosed politician.
– The Washington Post
His Masterful Oratory Attracted Tens of Thousands to His Rallies
The former journalist and poet-turned-politician was one of the few opposition lawmakers inside Parliament when India’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, still held office. Nehru was PM from 1947 until his death in 1964.
Vajpayee’s more than five-decade-long career peaked in the 1990s, when his masterful oratory attracted tens of thousands to his rallies across the country.
– The Guardian
courtesy : thequint.com
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Sanjay Raut demands re-election, alleges irregularities in EVMs during Maharashtra polls
Mumbai, Nov 25: Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut on Monday demanded a re-election in Maharashtra using ballot papers, claiming there were irregularities with the electronic voting machines (EVMs).
Talking to reporters, Raut alleged several complaints about EVMs malfunctioning and questioned the integrity of the recently held elections.
The BJP-led Mahayuti won 230 out of 288 seats in the assembly elections, while the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi managed 46 seats, with Shiv Sena (UBT) winning just 20 out of 95 seats it contested.
"We have received nearly 450 complaints regarding EVMs. Despite raising objections repeatedly, no action has been taken on these issues. How can we say these elections were conducted fairly? Hence, I demand that the results be set aside and elections be held again using ballot papers," Raut said.
Citing some instances, he said a candidate in Nashik reportedly received only four votes despite having 65 votes from his family, while in Dombivli, discrepancies were found in EVM tallies, and election officials refused to acknowledge the objections.
The Sena (UBT) leader also questioned the credibility of the landslide victories of some candidates, saying, "What revolutionary work have they done to receive more than 1.5 lakh votes? Even leaders who recently switched parties have become MLAs. This raises suspicions. For the first time, a senior leader like Sharad Pawar has expressed doubts about EVMs, which cannot be ignored."
Asked about the MVA's poor performance in the elections, Raut rejected the idea of blaming a single individual.
"We fought as a united MVA. Even a leader like Sharad Pawar, who commands immense respect in Maharashtra, faced defeat. This shows that we need to analyse the reasons behind the failure. One of the reasons is EVM irregularities and the misuse of the system, unconstitutional practices, and even judicial decisions left unresolved by Justice Chandrachud," he said.
Raut stressed that though internal differences might have existed within the MVA, the failure was collective.
He also accused the Mahayuti of conducting the elections in an unfair manner.
"I cannot call the elections fair given the numerous reports of discrepancies in EVMs, mismatched numbers, and vote irregularities across the state," Raut said.
