JMI suspends social work professor over exam question on atrocities against Muslims, orders inquiry
New Delhi: Jamia Millia Islamia has suspended a faculty member from its Department of Social Work after objections were raised to a question in an end-of-semester examination paper that asked students to discuss atrocities against Muslim minorities in India.
The suspended teacher is identified as Prof. Virendra Balaji Shahare, who had set the BA (Hons) Social Work Semester-I examination paper for the course Social Problems in India for the 2025-26 academic session. University officials said multiple complaints were received from various quarters regarding the content of the question paper, prompting administrative action.
According to a Maktoob Media report, the university said, in an order issued on December 23, the competent authority had taken a serious view of what it described as negligence and carelessness on the part of the paper setter. Acting on the Vice-Chancellor’s directions and invoking Statute 37(1) of the university statutes, Prof. Shahare was placed under suspension with immediate effect, pending the outcome of a formal inquiry, stating that a police complaint would be filed in accordance with rules.
ALSO READ: BJP wins Kinnigoli, Bajpe, Manki Town Panchayat elections
During the period of suspension, Prof. Shahare has been directed to remain headquartered in New Delhi and has been barred from leaving without prior permission. Copies of the order have been sent to senior officials, including the dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences, the head of the Department of Social Work and the Controller of Examinations.
While the university has not publicly clarified the precise nature of the objections to the examination question, it has triggered strong reactions on campus and beyond, with students, teachers and rights groups questioning the move.
Describing Professor Shahare as a committed teacher, Humaira Aftab, a former student of the department, said that the question was directly linked to the subject being taught and she further argued that examining the condition of minorities was central to understanding social problems. She also warned that the suspension could set a troubling precedent for academic discourse.
A faculty member from Jamia, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the action reflected a broader climate in which universities were under pressure to avoid questions that could lead to scrutiny of state policies or social realities, adding that institutional leaderships were increasingly constrained in defending academic autonomy.
Calling it an attack on academic freedom, the Jamia unit of the Fraternity Movement has also demanded the immediate revocation of the suspension. Cautioning that continued inaction could lead to collective protests by students, the group said in a statement, the examination question fell squarely within the scope of the course.
The inquiry against Prof. Shahare is yet to begin, while the suspension will remain in force until its completion.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
SC flags 'trust deficit', orders deployment of judicial officers in Bengal's SIR exercise
New Delhi (PTI): Dismayed over ongoing tussle between the West Bengal government and the Election Commission, the Supreme Court on Friday issued an "extraordinary" direction to deploy serving and former district judges to assist the poll panel in the controversy-ridden special intensive revision of electoral rolls in the state.
Ruing the "unfortunate blame game" and the "trust deficit" between the EC and the "democratically elected" TMC government, a bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi passed a slew of fresh directions to ensure completion of the special intensive revision (SIR) process.
The bench ordered deputation of judicial officers for adjudication of claims and objections of the persons, who are put under the logical discrepancy lists and facing removal of their names from the electoral rolls.
Logical discrepancies in progeny linking with the 2002 voter list include instances of a mismatch in the parent's name and the age difference between a voter and their parent being less than 15 years or more than 50 years.
The top court asked Calcutta High Court Chief Justice Sujoy Paul to spare some judicial officers and find former judges to assist in the SIR work as it took serious note of the state government not sparing enough grade 'A'0 officers for the revision exercise.
Chief Justice Paul has been asked to convene a meeting on Saturday and the same will be attended by Chief Secretary, DGP, official from the EC, Advocate General of the state. Additional Solicitor General of the Union and the Registrar General of the high court on the issue of finalising modalities of deputing judicial officers in SIR process.
"In order to ensure fairness in the adjudication of the genuineness of the documents and consequential inclusion/exclusion in voters list, and as agreed to by both sides, we are left with hardly any other option but to request the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court to spare serving judicial officers along with some former judicial officers in the rank of Additional District Judge and District Judges who can then be requested to revisit/dispose of the pending claims under the category of 'logical discrepancy'," the bench ordered.
Disregarding the vehement objections of the state government, the top court permitted the EC to publish a final list of voters in the state by February 28, the deadline fixed earlier. However, it also permitted the election commission to come out with supplementary lists later.
It noted that no prejudice will be caused to anyone if supplementary voter lists are issued after February 28 as names of electors can be included till the last date of filing of nomination papers for the elections.
Senior advocate Shyam Divan, appearing for Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, alleged that the orders passed by the electoral roll officers are now being scrutinised by a "new species of officers" called the 'special roll officers'.
"The 'special roll officers' cannot trump EROs. How can they on a wholesale basis reject what ERO has done?" Divan asked.
The election commission refuted that claim and said that the SROs are there since inception. The bench agreed with the submissions of the poll panel.
The bench further said that if there is non-cooperation then the court will deploy judicial officers or ask the EC to deploy the officials from other states.
During the hearing, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the state government, said that there might be a law and order problem, if the poll panel is permitted to publish the final voter list by February 28.
In a bid to balance equity, the top court said such judicial officers/former judicial officers, while adjudicating the claims and objections, shall be assisted by poll panel's micro-observers and also by the officers of the state government.
"The circumstances being extraordinary, the entrustment of work to judicial officers and former judicial officers is also extraordinary," the bench said.
Senior advocate DS Naidu, appearing for the EC raised the issue of non-cooperation and the law and order enforcement alleging that the documents have been torn apart from miscreants and yet hardly any action has been taken.
He produced the statements made by different political functionaries against the poll officials and said no FIRs were registered against anyone.
CJI Kant, who perused the statements said, "Unfortunately, during the election such irresponsible statements are being made. If no action is taken, the DGP will face the consequences."
The bench then directed district collectors and SPs of the state to provide logistical support and security to the judicial officers deputed for the ongoing SIR work while making it clear that orders passed by judicial officers will be deemed as orders of court.
It said the collector and SPs will be considered under deemed deputation for the purpose of ensuring compliance of directions that may be issued from time to time by the court.
It directed the DGP to file an affidavit on the steps taken on complaints regarding threats to officers involved in the SIR process.
The bench directed the Calcutta High Court chief justice to evolve some alternate interim arrangement for shifting of matters requiring urgent relief to other courts for ten days.
On February 9, the top court made it clear to the states that it will not allow anyone to create any impediment in completion of the SIR and directed the WB DGP to file an affidavit on the EC allegation of burning of its notices by miscreants.
