Lok Sabha passes Bill to encourage institutional arbitration
New Delhi, Aug 10 : The Lok Sabha on Friday passed a bill that seeks to encourage institutional arbitration for settlement of disputes and make India a centre of robust Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanism.
Replying to debate on the Bill, Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said: "It is a giant leap in favour of institutional arbitration."
"It is a historic moment. We want to make India the hub of domestic and international arbitration. We have very good lawyers, jurists, advocates and judges in India, then why can't we do it," he said.
He said the goverment wants best arbitrators should also come from India.
"It is believed that only the British Queen's Councillors are the best barristers. This is a kind of imperialism. They are monopolising arbitration even in Singapore. They maybe good arbitrators but they are not the best. Our government will not allow a new imperialism to come in arbitration globally which brings in only a particular type of arbitrators," he said.
He said IT professionals should be brought in the process of arbitration and the Bill will give accountability and grading of arbitration a lot of importance.
Referring to Trinamool Congress member Saugata Roy who took part in the debate, Prasad said he could also play a role in the process of arbitration if he decides to leave politics.
The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2018, seeks to establish Arbitration Council of India (ACI) for the promotion of arbitration, mediation, conciliation and other ADRs.
Earlier, moving the Bill, Minister of State for Law and Justice P.P. Chaudhary said commercial disputes have increased manifold due to globalization and the dispute resolution mechanism being created by the government will prove to be a milestone.
Participating in the debate, Congress member Sunil Jakhar said that Rafale fighter jet deal with France would go for arbitration and alleged that 36 fighter jests were being purchased by Modi government at almost the same price negotiated by the UPA government for 126 aircraft.
He claimed that the then foreign secretary "did not know that the deal of this quantum was being signed" and alleged that Official Secrets Act had been breached.
Congress members also raised slogans in favour of a joint parliamentary committee.
The Bill seeks to amend the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to facilitate speedy appointment of arbitrators through designated arbitral institutions by the Supreme Court or the High Court, without having any requirement to approach the court in this regard.
It would grade arbitral institution and accredit arbitrators by laying down norms.
It will evolve policy and guidelines for the establishment, operation and maintenance of uniform professional standards relating to arbitration and ADR mechanism. The ACI shall also maintain an electronic depository of all arbitral awards,
The Bill seeks to exclude international arbitration from the bounds of timeline and provides that time limit for arbitral award in other arbitrations shall be within 12 months from the completion of the pleadings of the parties.
The Bill provides that the arbitrator and the arbitral institutions shall keep confidentiality of all arbitral proceedings except award and protect an arbitrator from suit or other legal proceedings from any action or omission done in good faith in the course of arbitration proceedings.
Officials said that the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was amended by the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 in order to make arbitration process user friendly, cost effective and ensure speedy disposal and neutrality of arbitrators.
However, to give a boost to institutional arbitration vis-a-vis ad hoc arbitration and to remove some practical difficulties, a high-level committee under the chairmanship of Justice B.H. Srikrishna, a retired Supreme Court judge, was formed by the Centre.
They said the committee submitted its report on July 30, 2017 and the proposed amendments are in accordance with the recommendations.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Karnataka Minister Satish Jarkiholi triggers debate over change of Congress state president
Bengaluru, Jan 15: Karnataka Public Works Minister Satish Jarkiholi on Wednesday sparked a debate within the ruling Congress over the change of the state president, saying a full-time leader was needed to devote more time to the party in the state.
Currently, Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar holds the post.
“It’s not about whether this person or that person should become the party president. The person should give their full time to the party. That’s the only demand, and nothing else,” Jarkiholi told reporters here.
According to him, while there is a lot of discussion happening at the lower levels, it should also take place at the top level.
“It’s not about someone’s adamant posture. We want someone who works, that’s it,” the minister said.
Noting that the decision is up to the party's high command, whether to allow the incumbent to continue or bring in someone new, Jarkiholi emphasised that a discussion at the top level was needed.
The minister added, “The organisational work has decreased since all of us became ministers. We are busy with the work of our portfolios and our districts. We are not going anywhere, and we are not able to devote time to the party.”
He further explained that earlier, Congress leaders were all active in the party organisation, but after becoming ministers, the pressure to handle district-level work left them with little time for the party.
“Our only concern is that the speed with which we worked in 2023 is no longer there,” he said.
Jarkiholi also claimed that the party leadership had intended to change the state president after the Lok Sabha elections, but this has not happened.
“There was talk, and also a written note with K C Venugopal’s signature, stating that the post should be given up after the Lok Sabha elections. So now, they need to clarify whether the same person will continue, or they should gather the leaders and decide on a new president,” he said.
According to him, a few people from the backward community are ready to take up the job.
Reacting to this, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah told media in New Delhi that the party high command’s decision was supreme.
When he was told about Jarkiholi’s claim regarding Venugopal’s written letter for a change of the Congress state president, he said, “You better ask him.”
Congress state working president and MLA Tanveer Sait said Jarkiholi had raised this issue in the recent Congress Legislative Party meeting, where it was discussed in detail.
“There is no such information with us regarding a cabinet reshuffle or change of the party president,” he told reporters in Mysuru.
