Mangaluru: The light house hill road in the city, earlier known as the St Aloysius college road, has been officially renamed as 'Mulki Sunder Ram Shetty road' in honour of the erstwhile Vijaya Bank's chairman.
The stretch of the road from Ambedkar circle to catholic club via light house hill, will now be known in the new name as per a notification issued by the state government.The official new name was declared at a function held here Wednesday morning by city mayor Diwakar Pandeshwar, who unveiled the sign board bearing the popular bankers name.
Several guests including BJP district president Sudharshan Moodbidri and Bunts welfare trust founder chairman Sadananda Shetty were present.The city corporations decision to rename the road in 2017 was delayed due to protests from the alumni of St Aloysius institutions and the local people who wanted to retain the earlier name.
The issue was moved to the High Court when the state government ordered a status quo.The Court later disposed off the case, directing the state government to take an appropriate decision.
The corporation reiterated its stand on renaming the road, after which the government issued a notification.The employees of the erstwhile Vijaya Bank had strongly argued for the renaming of the road. Mulki Sunder Ram Shetty was associated with the bank since 1946 and had been its chairman from 1962 to 1969.
The Vijaya Bank has now been merged with Bank of Baroda.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Prayagraj (PTI): The Allahabad High Court has set aside a lower court order mandating a man to pay maintenance to his estranged wife, observing that she earns her living and did not reveal the true salary in her affidavit.
Justice Madan Pal Singh also allowed a criminal revision petition filed by the man, Ankit Saha.
"A perusal of the impugned judgment indicates that in the affidavit filed before the trial court, the opposite party herself admitted that she is a post-graduate and a web designer by qualification. She is working as a senior sales coordinator in a company and getting a salary of Rs 34,000 per month," the court said in the December 3 order.
"But in her cross-examination, she has admitted that she was earning Rs 36,000 per month. Such an amount for a wife who has no other liability cannot be said to be meagre; whereas the man has the responsibility of maintaining his aged parents and other social obligations," it observed.
The high court observed that the woman was not entitled to get any maintenance from her husband "as she is an earning lady and able to maintain herself".
The man's counsel argued in court that the estranged wife did not reveal the whole truth in the affidavit.
"She claimed herself to be an illiterate and unemployed woman. When the document filed by the man was shown to her before the trial court, she admitted her income during cross-examination. Thus, it is clear that she did not come before the trial court with clean hands," the counsel submitted.
The court, in its order, said, "Cases of those litigants who have no regard for the truth and those who indulge in suppressing material facts need to be thrown out of the court."
It impugned the lower court's February 17 judgment and order, passed by the principal judge of a family court in Gautam Buddh Nagar and allowed the criminal revision petition filed by the man.
