Merely threatening by claiming to be ISIS terrorist not offence under UAPA: Madras HC
Chennai: The Madras High Court, while granting bail to a man accused under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), emphasized that merely threatening a person by claiming association with ISIS is not sufficient to conclude that the person supported the terrorist organization. The court specified that such threats could constitute a separate offense but not under the UAPA.
A bench comprising Justice SS Sundar and Justice Sunder Mohan asserted that the prosecution needed to present independent evidence to establish support for a terrorist organization. The judges stated, "Merely because the appellant had threatened the person stating that he was associated with an ISIS terrorist, it would by itself not be a reasonable ground to hold that he had supported a terrorist organization. The threat would certainly amount to an offense but not an offense under Section 39 of the UA (P) Act."
The court further highlighted that the materials provided by the prosecution did not demonstrate an intention to support a terrorist organization. Instead, they showed that the appellant handled funds for the prime accused, which differed from supporting a terrorist organization. The judges pointed out that, for bail in cases involving conspiracy under the UAPA, it was essential to specify the exact terrorist act agreed upon.
"The allegation of conspiracy to commit a terrorist act must spell out the object of the conspiracy (i.e.) as to what exactly was the terrorist act that was agreed to be committed. However, we may hasten to add that the above observations are made only for arriving at a prima facie satisfaction for the purpose of considering the bail application on the basis of the broad probabilities of the case," the court explained.
The court heard an appeal filed by Mohamed Irfan challenging the denial of bail. Irfan, along with others, was found in a car intercepted by the police on information that it was carrying arms and weapons. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) took over the investigation, and the case was registered for offenses under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The government granted sanction to prosecute the accused under the UAPA.
According to the final report, the prime accused, along with Irfan, engaged in anti-national activities in the name of the Khilafah Party of India and Intellectual Students of India (ISI). The appellant allegedly participated in discussions about ISIS ideologies and promoting the Khilafah Party of India. Irfan argued that the final report was based on surmises and conjectures, contending that there was no material to charge him under the UAPA. He asserted that the prosecution could only establish his association with the prime accused, not the terrorist organization.
The prosecution countered that Irfan had threatened witnesses by claiming association with ISIS, creating a potential danger. The court noted that, while assessing a prima facie case, even a grave suspicion is sufficient to frame charges. However, when considering bail and the denial of liberty, a different test applies. The court stressed that the accusations must not only be grave but also supported by cogent materials.
Regarding the restrictions under Section 43D of the UAPA, the court clarified that the provision does not take away basic human or constitutional rights. The restriction implies that courts cannot grant bail without sufficient reasons, ensuring that bail is not a mere formality. The court granted bail to Irfan on conditions, emphasizing that pre-trial detention should not be indefinite.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
55-bed free palliative care centre to open near Bengaluru’s Nelamangala
Bengaluru: A new 55-bed palliative care centre for terminally ill patients, named the Nemmadi Centre for Palliative Care, will be inaugurated near Nelamangala on Sunday. The facility will offer all services completely free of cost.
According to a report published by Deccan Herald on Saturday, the centre has been set up by the Sukruthi Charitable Trust in collaboration with Rotary Bangalore Midtown. Around Rs 20 crore has been invested in the project, which will operate without a billing counter, ensuring that families do not have to pay for treatment.
ALSO READ: Bengaluru: Shopkeeper stabbed for refusing to serve free panipuri
The centre will provide comprehensive palliative care, including medical support, counselling for patients and their families, and bereavement care. The facility aims to help families cope with the physical and emotional challenges of caring for terminally ill patients.
“A cornerstone of the project was the generous donation of land by former MLC E Krishnappa, which made the centre possible,” DH quoted Palani Loganathan as saying.
The inauguration ceremony will be attended by Madhusudan Sai, founder of the Sri Madhusudan Sai Global Humanitarian Mission, Karnataka Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao and Rajya Sabha MP Dr C.N. Manjunath who also serves as the chief medical advisor to the centre will also be present, along with several senior government officials and healthcare leaders.
