Muslims have constitutional right to build Babri Masjid: JD(U) MP Kaushalendra Kumar
Nalanda, Bihar: Janata Dal (United) MP Kaushalendra Kumar on Monday expressed support for Humayun Kabir, the suspended Trinamool Congress MLA from West Bengal, who recently laid the foundation stone for a “Babri Masjid” in Murshidabad district. His remarks were reported by PTI.
Speaking to journalists in his Nalanda parliamentary constituency, the JD(U) leader said the Constitution grants every citizen the right to practice and propagate their religion, and therefore “nobody should have a problem” if building such a mosque aligns with the sentiments of Muslims.
Kaushalendra Kumar’s statement comes despite the JD(U) being an ally of the BJP both in Bihar and at the Centre. He distanced himself from the BJP’s stance that constructing a mosque in the memory of Babur would be akin to honouring an “invader” who later established the Mughal empire in India.
“I have not seen Babur and do not have much idea of what he stood for. But we have been following the Constitution since Independence, which guarantees the right to freedom of religion,” he said.
When asked about the BJP’s strong opposition to the proposed mosque in West Bengal ahead of the upcoming Assembly elections, the MP countered that the political situation was being misrepresented.
He argued that it was West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee who acted against a Muslim leader “for voicing his religious sentiments,” referring to Kabir’s suspension by the TMC over the mosque foundation event.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
SC orders forensic test of UP DIG's voice clip; quashes case against senior citizen
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Monday ordered a forensic examination of an audio clip in which a senior Uttar Pradesh police officer purportedly is heard using a communal slur against Muslims.
A bench comprising Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and K Vinod Chandran also quashed the criminal proceedings against a senior Muslim citizen who had circulated the clip seeking confirmation of its authenticity.
The voice clip, which will now be examined by a forensic laboratory, is allegedly of Sanjeev Tyagi, who is now serving as the Deputy Inspector General of Police in the state.
The bench said the prosecution of petitioner Islamuddin Ansari was "totally an abuse of police authority and the judicial process", noting that the Uttar Pradesh government itself had sought withdrawal of the case after it issued notice.
ALSO READ: Delhi HC asks Centre to hear affected persons before demolishing structures in Ajmer dargah
"We find it to be totally an abuse of their authority and also the process of the court by the police in initiating the proceeding... we are more concerned with the background in which such a situation arose.
"The petitioner having asked the superintendent of police and rightly so, before making a formal complaint, as to whether the voice purported to be his, disclosing that he had used some very objectionable language was, never replied to," the bench said.
The controversy began when Ansari confronted Tyagi, then Superintendent of Police, over the alleged circulation of an audio clip in which the officer was heard making derogatory remarks against Muslims.
Before filing any complaint, Ansari had forwarded the clip to Tyagi asking whether the voice was his.
The officer never replied, and Ansari was instead booked for circulating hate speech.
His challenges before the trial court and the High Court failed, prompting him to approach the Supreme Court.
After the state informed the court it was withdrawing the complaint, the bench observed that the case against Ansari was "nothing but a counterblast" for questioning a senior police officer.
Finding the conduct of the local police "wholly unacceptable", the court set aside the FIR, chargesheet and all proceedings.
It also ordered an inquiry into the authenticity of the audio clip, directing that Tyagi's voice sample be collected and tested at the Telangana State Forensic Science Laboratory (TSFSL), Hyderabad, under the direct supervision of its director.
The bench said the director would be "personally responsible" for ensuring the test is conducted by competent officers "uninfluenced by any person, authority or extraneous consideration".
Tyagi, now DIG of Basti range, has been directed to appear before the Hyderabad laboratory within three weeks to provide his voice sample.
The petitioner will furnish the original audio clip or link for comparison.
The TSFSL director has been added as a respondent and must submit the forensic report in a sealed cover by January 31, 2026. The matter will be heard next on January 12, 2026.
Issuing a firm caution, the court warned authorities against any form of retaliation or pressure on Ansari during the inquiry, permitting him to approach it directly in case of harassment.
