“Only god will do justice”: Father of Bihar youngster arrested for abusive remarks against PM
Bharwara: The father of Mohammed Rizvi alias Raja, the young man jailed after a video surfaced of him using abusive language against Prime Minister Narendra Modi during Rahul Gandhi’s Voter Adhikar Yatra in August, says the family has been left devastated financially, socially, and emotionally.
Speaking to The Hindu, Rizvi’s father, Mohammed Anish, who runs a small two-wheeler repair shop in Bharwara village, said he has not been able to afford legal help for his son, nor has the family received a copy of the FIR from the police.
“I don’t have the means to fight a case. The police beat him so much that when I saw him, he looked half-dead,” Anish told The Hindu. “What was his crime, other than being poor?” he asked, his voice breaking.
The incident occurred on August 27 near Bithauli Mor on National Highway-27, where a local Congress unit had set up a reception stage for Rahul Gandhi’s Voter Adhikar Yatra. After the leaders left, Rizvi was recorded on the same stage making derogatory comments against the Prime Minister. Once the video spread widely on social media, the BJP’s Darbhanga district president filed a complaint. Later that night, police from Simri and Singhwara stations arrested Rizvi from his home.
Anish said his son used to work as a casual car driver to support the household. Since the arrest, the family’s livelihood has collapsed. Customers have stopped coming to his shop, and rent arrears have piled up.
“I run this shop on rent,₹15,000 a month. I have not been able to pay for several months,” he said. “Some days I go home with nothing. I feel helpless.”
His wife, Chand Bibi, is a heart patient, and the stress has further weakened her health.
Anish, the only Muslim resident in the locality, said he has now taken a vow not to speak about the incident due to emotional exhaustion. “If I break my vow, Allah will not forgive me,” he told The Hindu. “I have left everything to God.”
Rizvi is the third of eight siblings. Family members say he is weak in jail and suffering from continuous headaches, but they cannot afford medical treatment.
When asked how he expects his son to be released without legal intervention, Anish responded softly: “He will be released only when God wills.”
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Deep societal faultlines persist despite 75 years of independence: Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
Judge cites denial of home to Muslim girl, opposition to Dalit women cooking mid-day meals
Hyderabad, February 23, 2026: Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has said that despite repeated affirmations of constitutional morality by courts, deep societal faultlines rooted in caste and religious discrimination continue to shape everyday realities in India.
Speaking at a seminar on “Constitutional Morality and the Role of District Judiciary” organised by the Telangana Judges Association and the Telangana State Judicial Academy in Hyderabad, Justice Bhuyan reflected on the gap between constitutional ideals and social practices.
He cited a recent instance involving his daughter’s friend, a PhD scholar at a private university in Noida, who was denied accommodation in South Delhi after her surname revealed her Muslim identity. According to Justice Bhuyan, the landlady bluntly informed her that no accommodation was available once her religious background became known.
In another example from Odisha, he referred to resistance by some parents to the government’s mid-day meal programme because the food was prepared by Dalit women employed as cooks. He noted that some parents had objected aggressively and refused to allow their children to consume meals cooked by members of the Scheduled Caste community.
Describing these incidents as “the tip of the iceberg,” Justice Bhuyan said they reveal how far society remains from the benchmark of constitutional morality even 75 years into the Republic. He observed that while the Constitution lays down standards of equality and dignity, the morality practised within homes and communities often diverges sharply from those values.
He emphasised that constitutional morality requires governance through the rule of law rather than the rule of popular opinion. Referring to the evolution of the doctrine through judicial decisions, he cited Naz Foundation v Union of India, in which the Delhi High Court read down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, holding that popular morality cannot restrict fundamental rights under Article 21. Though the judgment was later overturned in Suresh Kumar Koushal v Naz Foundation, the Supreme Court ultimately restored and expanded the principle in Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, affirming that constitutional morality must prevail over majoritarian views.
“In our constitutional scheme, it is the constitutionality of the issue before the court that is relevant, not the dominant or popular view,” he said.
Justice Bhuyan also addressed the functioning of the district judiciary, underlining that trial courts are the first point of contact for most litigants and form the foundation of the justice delivery system. He stressed that due importance must be given to the recording of evidence and adjudication of bail matters.
Highlighting the role of High Courts, he said their supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution is intended as a shield to correct grave jurisdictional errors, not as a mechanism to substitute the discretion or factual appreciation of trial judges.
He recalled that several distinguished judges, including Justice H R Khanna, Justice A M Ahmadi, and Justice Fathima Beevi, began their careers in the district judiciary.
On representation within the judicial system, Justice Bhuyan noted that Telangana has made significant strides in gender inclusion. Out of a sanctioned strength of 655 judicial officers in the Telangana Judicial Service, 478 are currently serving, of whom 283 are women, exceeding 50 per cent representation. He added that members of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, minority communities, and persons with disabilities are also represented in the state’s judiciary.
He observed that greater representation of women, marginalised communities, persons with disabilities, and sexual minorities would help make the judiciary more inclusive and reflective of India’s diversity. “The judiciary must represent all the colours of the rainbow and become a rainbow institution,” he said.
Justice Bhuyan also referred to the recent restoration by the Supreme Court of the requirement of a minimum three years of practice at the Bar for entry-level judicial posts. While acknowledging that the requirement ensures practical exposure, he cautioned that its impact on women aspirants, especially those from rural or small-town backgrounds facing social and financial constraints, would need to be carefully observed over time.
Concluding his address, he reiterated that the justice system must strive to bridge the gap between constitutional ideals and lived realities, ensuring that the rule of law remains paramount.
