Shawarma death case: Kerala HC says eateries must exhibit date, time of food preparation on packing
Kochi: The Kerala High Court has issued instructions for eateries to display the date and time of food preparation on packaging, particularly focusing on the popular dish 'Shawarma'. The directive comes in response to a petition filed by the mother of a 16-year-old who lost her life in 2022 after consuming Shawarma.
Justice Devan Ramachandran, while addressing the plea, emphasized the need for public awareness regarding the importance of consuming such food items within a specified timeframe. The court directed the issuance of instructions to eateries to prominently exhibit the date and time of food preparation on packaging, whether served over the counter or through parcels.
The Food Safety Commissioner, Afsana Parveen, informed the court that consuming Shawarma beyond the recommended timeframe was a significant cause of accidents. She reported that 'Shawarma Guidelines' had been issued in September 2022, accompanied by an 'Order of Ban' in January 2023. Regular enforcement drives and inspections were conducted, resulting in notices and orders issued to eateries concerning parcel labeling and the mandatory mention of the specific date and time of manufacture.
Despite the ban on using raw eggs in the production and storage of mayonnaise, the court noted an incident of death due to Shawarma consumption after the ban's issuance. The court acknowledged the Food Safety Commissioner's efforts but emphasized the importance of making eateries and consumers aware of the potential risks.
The court decided to maintain the writ petition on file to monitor the implementation of orders, regulations, and circulars in the interest of public safety. In response to the petitioner's allegations, the court directed the respondents to file a counter affidavit outlining their response, along with details of guidelines, orders, regulations, and actions taken against the eatery in question.
The court had initiated a suo motu case after the 16-year-old's death and hospitalization of over 50 individuals linked to Shawarma consumption. The mother, seeking compensation of Rs. 1 Crore and strict compliance with the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, filed the present plea.
The case will be further considered on December 5.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Deep societal faultlines persist despite 75 years of independence: Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
Judge cites denial of home to Muslim girl, opposition to Dalit women cooking mid-day meals
Hyderabad, February 23, 2026: Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has said that despite repeated affirmations of constitutional morality by courts, deep societal faultlines rooted in caste and religious discrimination continue to shape everyday realities in India.
Speaking at a seminar on “Constitutional Morality and the Role of District Judiciary” organised by the Telangana Judges Association and the Telangana State Judicial Academy in Hyderabad, Justice Bhuyan reflected on the gap between constitutional ideals and social practices.
He cited a recent instance involving his daughter’s friend, a PhD scholar at a private university in Noida, who was denied accommodation in South Delhi after her surname revealed her Muslim identity. According to Justice Bhuyan, the landlady bluntly informed her that no accommodation was available once her religious background became known.
In another example from Odisha, he referred to resistance by some parents to the government’s mid-day meal programme because the food was prepared by Dalit women employed as cooks. He noted that some parents had objected aggressively and refused to allow their children to consume meals cooked by members of the Scheduled Caste community.
Describing these incidents as “the tip of the iceberg,” Justice Bhuyan said they reveal how far society remains from the benchmark of constitutional morality even 75 years into the Republic. He observed that while the Constitution lays down standards of equality and dignity, the morality practised within homes and communities often diverges sharply from those values.
He emphasised that constitutional morality requires governance through the rule of law rather than the rule of popular opinion. Referring to the evolution of the doctrine through judicial decisions, he cited Naz Foundation v Union of India, in which the Delhi High Court read down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, holding that popular morality cannot restrict fundamental rights under Article 21. Though the judgment was later overturned in Suresh Kumar Koushal v Naz Foundation, the Supreme Court ultimately restored and expanded the principle in Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, affirming that constitutional morality must prevail over majoritarian views.
“In our constitutional scheme, it is the constitutionality of the issue before the court that is relevant, not the dominant or popular view,” he said.
Justice Bhuyan also addressed the functioning of the district judiciary, underlining that trial courts are the first point of contact for most litigants and form the foundation of the justice delivery system. He stressed that due importance must be given to the recording of evidence and adjudication of bail matters.
Highlighting the role of High Courts, he said their supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution is intended as a shield to correct grave jurisdictional errors, not as a mechanism to substitute the discretion or factual appreciation of trial judges.
He recalled that several distinguished judges, including Justice H R Khanna, Justice A M Ahmadi, and Justice Fathima Beevi, began their careers in the district judiciary.
On representation within the judicial system, Justice Bhuyan noted that Telangana has made significant strides in gender inclusion. Out of a sanctioned strength of 655 judicial officers in the Telangana Judicial Service, 478 are currently serving, of whom 283 are women, exceeding 50 per cent representation. He added that members of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, minority communities, and persons with disabilities are also represented in the state’s judiciary.
He observed that greater representation of women, marginalised communities, persons with disabilities, and sexual minorities would help make the judiciary more inclusive and reflective of India’s diversity. “The judiciary must represent all the colours of the rainbow and become a rainbow institution,” he said.
Justice Bhuyan also referred to the recent restoration by the Supreme Court of the requirement of a minimum three years of practice at the Bar for entry-level judicial posts. While acknowledging that the requirement ensures practical exposure, he cautioned that its impact on women aspirants, especially those from rural or small-town backgrounds facing social and financial constraints, would need to be carefully observed over time.
Concluding his address, he reiterated that the justice system must strive to bridge the gap between constitutional ideals and lived realities, ensuring that the rule of law remains paramount.
