Study reveals more than 40% journalists charged under UAPA since 2010 were charged in 2020
Free Speech Collective's study, titled "Behind Bars” highlights Press Freedom concerns in India
The increasing number of journalists facing charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) in India has raised significant concerns about the state of press freedom in the country. Since 2010, a total of 16 journalists have been charged under the draconian UAPA, a law initially designed to curb terrorist activities. However, its recent application against journalists investigating various issues has raised questions about the criminalization of legitimate journalistic work and the stifling impact on their profession.
The UAPA's punitive process, aimed at making incarceration the norm and bail the exception, has led to prolonged legal battles for those charged. Out of the 16 journalists charged, two managed to secure their freedom, one through acquittal and the other via discharge. Over the past decade, charges related to patriotism, national security, and alleged anti-national activities have been included in the UAPA arsenal, exemplified by the recent arrest of Prabir Purkayastha, the editor of the news portal Newsclick.
The First Information Report (FIR) against Purkayastha and the head of its human resources department, Amit Chakravarty, cites multiple sections of the UAPA, including Sections 13 (unlawful activities), 16 (terrorist act), 17 (raising funds for terrorist acts), 18 (conspiracy), and 22 (C) (offenses by companies, trusts), along with Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 153A (promoting enmity between different groups) and 120B (criminal conspiracy). These charges, often used against journalists, highlight the broader issue of press freedom in the country.
The Free Speech Collective's study, titled "Behind Bars," which analyzed a decade of journalists arrested in India (2010-20), revealed that 154 journalists faced arrest, detention, interrogation, or show cause notices for their professional work. More than 40 percent of these instances occurred in 2020. Additionally, nine foreign journalists faced deportation, arrest, interrogations, or were denied entry into India, further indicating the challenging environment faced by the press.
In a democratic society, journalists serve as messengers of news and information. Silencing them not only hampers their ability to report on vital issues but also compromises citizens' democratic right to access information without fear.
List of Journalists Charged Under UAPA (2010 till date):
- Journalists Currently Charged Under UAPA: 16
- Journalists Behind Bars for UAPA: 7
- Journalists on Bail on UAPA Charges: 8
- Journalists Charged but Not Arrested: 1
- Journalists Acquitted: 1
- Journalists Discharged: 1
Journalists Currently Facing Legal Action:
- Arrested, in Police Custody:
- Prabir Purkayastha, Editor, Newsclick – Arrested on 03.10.2023, New Delhi
- In Prison:
- Aasif Sultan, Reporter, Kashmir Narrator – Arrested on 27.08.2018; Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir
- Fahad Shah, Editor, The Kashmirwalla – Arrested on 04.02.2022; Pulwama, Jammu and Kashmir
- Sajjad Gul, Trainee Reporter, The Kashmir Walla – Arrested on 05.01.2022; Bandipora district, Jammu and Kashmir
- Rupesh Kumar, Independent Journalist – Arrested on 17.07.2022; Ramgarh district, Jharkhand
- Irfan Mehraj, Editor, Wande Magazine – Arrested on 21.03.2023; Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir
- Under House Arrest:
- Gautam Navlakha, Writer and Consulting Editor, Newsclick – Placed under house arrest on 30.08.2018; Surrendered and jailed on 20.04.2020; Reverted to house arrest on 19.11.2022
- On Bail (by Order of Arrest Date):
- Seema Azad, Editor Dastak, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh – Arrested in February 2010; Granted bail in August 2012; Raided on 06.09.2023
- Vishwa Vijay, Editor Dastak, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh – Arrested in February 2010; Granted bail in August 2012; Raided on 06.09.2023
- K K Shahina, Journalist Outlook – Case lodged in December 2010; Granted anticipatory bail in July 2011
- Siddique Kappan, Journalist, Azhimukham, Delhi – Arrested on 05.10.2020; Granted bail in UAPA case on 09.09.2023 and PMLA case on 23.12.2022
- Paojel Chaoba, Executive Editor, The Frontier Manipur, Imphal – Arrested on 17.01.2021; Granted bail on 18.01.2021
- Dhiren Sadokpam, Editor, The Frontier Manipur, Imphal – Arrested on 17.01.2021; Granted bail on 18.01.2021
- Shyam Meera Singh, Independent Journalist, New Delhi – Charged on 10.11.2021; Anticipatory bail granted on 18.11.2021
- Manan Dar, Photojournalist, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir – Arrested on 22.10.2021; Secured bail on 04.01.2023
- Charged but Not Arrested:
- Masrat Zahra, Photojournalist, Srinagar – Case registered on 18.04.2020
- Acquitted:
- Santosh Yadav, Bastar, Chhattisgarh – Arrested in September 2015; Acquitted on 02.01.2020
- Discharged:
- Kamran Yousuf, Pulwama, Jammu and Kashmir – Arrested in September 2017; Secured discharge on 16.03.2022
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Bill making CM chancellor of RDPR varsity replacing Guv passed in Council by one vote
Belagavi (Karnataka), Dec 18: The bill that proposes to replace the Karnataka Governor as chancellor of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (RDPR) University with the Chief Minister, was passed in the Karnataka Legislative Council on Wednesday, by one vote.
Having passed by both houses of the legislature, the bill will now have to go before the Governor for his assent to become a law.
Leader of Opposition in the council, Chalavadi Narayanaswamy opposed the bill and demanded for a division of votes during the voting on the bill. Hence, Council Chairman Basavaraj Horatti arranged for row wise headcount of members both in favour of and against the bill.
The division of votes showed 26 votes in favor of the bill, and 25 against it.
The Karnataka State Rural Development and Panchayat Raj University (Amendment) Bill, 2024 passed by the Assembly on Tuesday, seeks to amend the 2016 Act to make provisions for the Chief Minister to be the Chancellor, and for appointment of the vice chancellor by the chancellor from the panel of three persons suggested by search committee.
The Opposition BJP-JD(S) legislators walked out of the Assembly on Tuesday after clashing with the Congress, during the passage of the Bill.
Several opposition members questioned the intention of the government in replacing the Governor as the Chancellor of the university and insisted that the field of education should not be politicised.
JD(S) MLC T A Sharavana said the move seems to be out of hate towards the Governor, and suggested that there should always be a cordial relationship between the government and the Raj Bhavan.
"What the government is going to achieve by keeping the Governor away. CM is always busy politically and administratively. Can he give enough time towards the affairs of the University?" he asked.
BJP MLC C T Ravi questioned whether the Governor was not "cooperative" towards the University's functioning? "What is the intention behind bringing this amendment that was not there when the actual bill was brought a few years ago? Why is the constitutional authority being removed from the Chancellor's post?"
Congress MLC Ivan D'Souza, while defending the bill, said, "In what way the Governor can help the university? If the CM is the chancellor, he can organise funds for the development of the university. Nowhere law stipulates that only the Governor should be the chancellor. States like Gujarat have withdrawn the Governor from Chancellorship of various universities in their state."
Replying to the discussion, RDPR Minister Priyank Kharge said, the bill was not brought with any political malintention or out of any political hatred or to have any confrontation with the Governor.
The bill has been brought in to make the university function more efficiently, to make it coordinate with the government better and, to provide better quality of education and training for youths, he added.
"I have nowhere said that the Governor was not cooperating. As we felt that this is one of the better ways to manage the university, we have brought these amendments. Show me any guidelines including the UGC guidelines which says that only the Governor should be the Chancellor. No such guideline anywhere," Kharge said, pointing out that in various states like Gujarat and Arunachal Pradesh, the Governor has no role in several Universities.
