Mangaluru: The Highland Islamic Forum (HIF) organised an event titled "Aspire to Inspire for Better Life" at the Town Hall here on Wednesday. The programme aimed to motivate and guide individuals towards leading a meaningful and improved life.

Prominent personalities Moulana Huzaifa Vastanvi, CEO of Jamia Akkalkuwa, and Wali Rahmani, Founder of Umeed Global School, graced the event as distinguished guests.

The programme commenced with a recitation of verses from the Holy Quran by Aahil SM, setting a spiritual tone for the gathering. This was followed by Rizwan Pandeshwar, who delivered an introduction and provided an insightful overview of HIF India and its mission.

Moulana Huzaifa Vastanvi spoke about human existence through the teachings of the Quran, explaining that it encompasses two forms: physical and spiritual. He emphasized that spiritual existence is of greater importance, as it defines the purpose of life and our connection with the divine.

He shed light on the Quran's guidance regarding human existence and the reason for being sent to earth. He highlighted that the Quran is not merely a religious text but a complete way of life, offering solutions to many modern-day challenges, including widespread issues like depression, anxiety, and stress, which have gripped a large portion of the population.

He further pointed out that education alone cannot address the problems faced by humanity. Instead, he stressed the need for a balance between education and spirituality, urging people to hold firmly to their faith in Allah. He called upon social organisations to work towards fostering this balance to create a more harmonious society.

Moulana Vastanvi also addressed misconceptions about Islam, stating that it is not just an alternative solution but the ultimate solution to the problems of the world. He underlined that the principles of Islam are universal and not confined to Muslims alone, offering guidance and remedies for people across the globe.

Wali Rahmani, Founder of Umeed Global School, addressed the audience with a compelling speech on the qualities of great leaders, drawing inspiration from Islamic history and the life of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and Hazrat Umar (RA). He urged Muslims to seek these qualities in their leaders, emphasizing the need for integrity, justice, and inclusivity in leadership.

Rahmani referenced Mahatma Gandhi's recognition of Hazrat Umar's exemplary rule, noting that Gandhi listed him as the top ruler in his book Harijan. He pointed out that a key trait of a great leader is their reluctance to seek power. To illustrate this, he recounted the instance when Hazrat Abubakar (RA) chose Hazrat Umar (RA) as his successor, a decision that deeply moved and humbled Umar.

He encouraged individuals to aspire to be leaders who embody these values whenever they are elected or appointed to any position of responsibility. Highlighting the inclusivity of Hazrat Umar’s governance, Rahmani noted how he maintained harmony and fairness across all communities and religions during his rule, setting an example for leaders today.

Rahmani also called upon people and organisations to foster unity within the community. He stressed the importance of working with pure intentions and refraining from judging others based on personal faith practices. He urged the Muslim community to avoid complacency, reminding them of the continuous effort needed to work towards the betterment of society and their own progress.

Wali Rahmani also shared his inspiring journey of establishing Umeed Academy, which he started with just three orphaned children. Today, the academy has grown into a global institution, nurturing the futures of 350 students from diverse backgrounds.

He credited the success of Umeed Academy entirely to Allah’s blessings, emphasizing the importance of pure intentions, hard work, and sacrifices. Rahmani reflected on the challenges he faced, particularly the sacrifices he made during his youth, which he dedicated to building the institution.

These addresses were followed by questions and answers session wherein the speakers took questions from audience and answered their queries.

Adil Pandeshwar, HIF President was present on stage during the event.

The event concluded with Shaaz Yusuf Rasheed presenting vote of thanks to the attendees.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Judge cites denial of home to Muslim girl, opposition to Dalit women cooking mid-day meals

Hyderabad, February 23, 2026: Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has said that despite repeated affirmations of constitutional morality by courts, deep societal faultlines rooted in caste and religious discrimination continue to shape everyday realities in India.

Speaking at a seminar on “Constitutional Morality and the Role of District Judiciary” organised by the Telangana Judges Association and the Telangana State Judicial Academy in Hyderabad, Justice Bhuyan reflected on the gap between constitutional ideals and social practices.

He cited a recent instance involving his daughter’s friend, a PhD scholar at a private university in Noida, who was denied accommodation in South Delhi after her surname revealed her Muslim identity. According to Justice Bhuyan, the landlady bluntly informed her that no accommodation was available once her religious background became known.

In another example from Odisha, he referred to resistance by some parents to the government’s mid-day meal programme because the food was prepared by Dalit women employed as cooks. He noted that some parents had objected aggressively and refused to allow their children to consume meals cooked by members of the Scheduled Caste community.

Describing these incidents as “the tip of the iceberg,” Justice Bhuyan said they reveal how far society remains from the benchmark of constitutional morality even 75 years into the Republic. He observed that while the Constitution lays down standards of equality and dignity, the morality practised within homes and communities often diverges sharply from those values.

He emphasised that constitutional morality requires governance through the rule of law rather than the rule of popular opinion. Referring to the evolution of the doctrine through judicial decisions, he cited Naz Foundation v Union of India, in which the Delhi High Court read down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, holding that popular morality cannot restrict fundamental rights under Article 21. Though the judgment was later overturned in Suresh Kumar Koushal v Naz Foundation, the Supreme Court ultimately restored and expanded the principle in Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, affirming that constitutional morality must prevail over majoritarian views.

“In our constitutional scheme, it is the constitutionality of the issue before the court that is relevant, not the dominant or popular view,” he said.

Justice Bhuyan also addressed the functioning of the district judiciary, underlining that trial courts are the first point of contact for most litigants and form the foundation of the justice delivery system. He stressed that due importance must be given to the recording of evidence and adjudication of bail matters.

Highlighting the role of High Courts, he said their supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution is intended as a shield to correct grave jurisdictional errors, not as a mechanism to substitute the discretion or factual appreciation of trial judges.

He recalled that several distinguished judges, including Justice H R Khanna, Justice A M Ahmadi, and Justice Fathima Beevi, began their careers in the district judiciary.

On representation within the judicial system, Justice Bhuyan noted that Telangana has made significant strides in gender inclusion. Out of a sanctioned strength of 655 judicial officers in the Telangana Judicial Service, 478 are currently serving, of whom 283 are women, exceeding 50 per cent representation. He added that members of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, minority communities, and persons with disabilities are also represented in the state’s judiciary.

He observed that greater representation of women, marginalised communities, persons with disabilities, and sexual minorities would help make the judiciary more inclusive and reflective of India’s diversity. “The judiciary must represent all the colours of the rainbow and become a rainbow institution,” he said.

Justice Bhuyan also referred to the recent restoration by the Supreme Court of the requirement of a minimum three years of practice at the Bar for entry-level judicial posts. While acknowledging that the requirement ensures practical exposure, he cautioned that its impact on women aspirants, especially those from rural or small-town backgrounds facing social and financial constraints, would need to be carefully observed over time.

Concluding his address, he reiterated that the justice system must strive to bridge the gap between constitutional ideals and lived realities, ensuring that the rule of law remains paramount.