Two day Workshop on "The Indian Startup and MSME Ecosystem in the Age of AI" Concludes at BIT
Mangalore: The Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bearys Institute of Technology (BIT), Mangalore, successfully hosted a two-day workshop on “The Indian Startup and MSME Ecosystem in the Age of AI” on December 4th and 5th, 2024. The event, aimed at equipping participants with knowledge about the evolving entrepreneurial ecosystem and the transformative role of artificial intelligence, was attended by around 150 students, faculty also Research Scholars and facutly from other institutes as well participated in the event.
The workshop commenced with a Welcome Address by Dr. Vasantha Kumar, Organizing Chair and Head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, emphasizing the importance of startups and MSMEs in India’s economy and the potential of AI in fostering innovation and sustainability.
The Inaugural Speech was delivered by Dr. S I Manjur Basha, Patron of the event and Principal of BIT, who spoke about the institution’s commitment to bridging the gap between academia and industry through such initiatives.
Prof. Gokuldas M, Assistant Professor and one of the Event Coordinators, introduced the Chief Guest, Mr. Chetan Kumar G S, Founder and CEO of Initium Incubation and Mentoring Consultancy and Mr. Santhosh V., Project Director at Skill & MSME,Initium Incubation and Mentoring Consultancy Bengaluru.
In his keynote address, Mr. Chetan Kumar shared his experiences as a national startup mentor and provided deep insights into navigating the challenges of the startup ecosystem in the AI age.
The workshop featured technical sessions by the speakers. Their presentations covered government support schemes, funding opportunities, and AI-driven business models, offering actionable insights for budding entrepreneurs.
A key highlight of the event was the Student Activity Session, where participants pitched innovative ideas with the potential to become startups. This session provided a platform for students to showcase their creativity and problem-solving skills while receiving constructive feedback from the Chief Guest and Resource Person.
The event concluded with a Valedictory Note and Vote of Thanks by Dr. Sandeep Nambiar , Assistant Professor and Event Coordinator.
During the Validity Ceremony, the Chief Guest, Resource Person, were honored for their invaluable contributions. Certificates of participation were distributed to all attendees.
The workshop culminated with participants motivated to apply their learnings and contribute to India’s startup and MSME ecosystem.
3
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Deep societal faultlines persist despite 75 years of independence: Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
Judge cites denial of home to Muslim girl, opposition to Dalit women cooking mid-day meals
Hyderabad, February 23, 2026: Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has said that despite repeated affirmations of constitutional morality by courts, deep societal faultlines rooted in caste and religious discrimination continue to shape everyday realities in India.
Speaking at a seminar on “Constitutional Morality and the Role of District Judiciary” organised by the Telangana Judges Association and the Telangana State Judicial Academy in Hyderabad, Justice Bhuyan reflected on the gap between constitutional ideals and social practices.
He cited a recent instance involving his daughter’s friend, a PhD scholar at a private university in Noida, who was denied accommodation in South Delhi after her surname revealed her Muslim identity. According to Justice Bhuyan, the landlady bluntly informed her that no accommodation was available once her religious background became known.
In another example from Odisha, he referred to resistance by some parents to the government’s mid-day meal programme because the food was prepared by Dalit women employed as cooks. He noted that some parents had objected aggressively and refused to allow their children to consume meals cooked by members of the Scheduled Caste community.
Describing these incidents as “the tip of the iceberg,” Justice Bhuyan said they reveal how far society remains from the benchmark of constitutional morality even 75 years into the Republic. He observed that while the Constitution lays down standards of equality and dignity, the morality practised within homes and communities often diverges sharply from those values.
He emphasised that constitutional morality requires governance through the rule of law rather than the rule of popular opinion. Referring to the evolution of the doctrine through judicial decisions, he cited Naz Foundation v Union of India, in which the Delhi High Court read down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, holding that popular morality cannot restrict fundamental rights under Article 21. Though the judgment was later overturned in Suresh Kumar Koushal v Naz Foundation, the Supreme Court ultimately restored and expanded the principle in Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, affirming that constitutional morality must prevail over majoritarian views.
“In our constitutional scheme, it is the constitutionality of the issue before the court that is relevant, not the dominant or popular view,” he said.
Justice Bhuyan also addressed the functioning of the district judiciary, underlining that trial courts are the first point of contact for most litigants and form the foundation of the justice delivery system. He stressed that due importance must be given to the recording of evidence and adjudication of bail matters.
Highlighting the role of High Courts, he said their supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution is intended as a shield to correct grave jurisdictional errors, not as a mechanism to substitute the discretion or factual appreciation of trial judges.
He recalled that several distinguished judges, including Justice H R Khanna, Justice A M Ahmadi, and Justice Fathima Beevi, began their careers in the district judiciary.
On representation within the judicial system, Justice Bhuyan noted that Telangana has made significant strides in gender inclusion. Out of a sanctioned strength of 655 judicial officers in the Telangana Judicial Service, 478 are currently serving, of whom 283 are women, exceeding 50 per cent representation. He added that members of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, minority communities, and persons with disabilities are also represented in the state’s judiciary.
He observed that greater representation of women, marginalised communities, persons with disabilities, and sexual minorities would help make the judiciary more inclusive and reflective of India’s diversity. “The judiciary must represent all the colours of the rainbow and become a rainbow institution,” he said.
Justice Bhuyan also referred to the recent restoration by the Supreme Court of the requirement of a minimum three years of practice at the Bar for entry-level judicial posts. While acknowledging that the requirement ensures practical exposure, he cautioned that its impact on women aspirants, especially those from rural or small-town backgrounds facing social and financial constraints, would need to be carefully observed over time.
Concluding his address, he reiterated that the justice system must strive to bridge the gap between constitutional ideals and lived realities, ensuring that the rule of law remains paramount.
