Udupi : Finally, decades–old govt. maternity and child care hospital downs its shutters
Udupi, September 24: The Haji Abdulla Hospital, known as the government maternity and child care hospital in the district which was the lifeline for the poor people, not only in the district, but also in neighbouring districts for almost eight decades downed its shutters officially on Monday.
From tomorrow, the hospital will be shifted to the Karnataka Government Koosamma Shambhu Shetty Haji Abdulla Memorial Mother and Child Care Hospital, constructed by the Bengaluru-based BRS Health and Research Institute of NRI businessman BR Shetty, just besides the old building.
After then President Pranab Mukherjee had inaugurated the hospital on November 19, 2017, the out-patient section was shifted to the new hospital building as per the agreement from last July. Almost half of the services of the government hospital were shifted then itself.
In a circular issued by the Commissioner of the Health and Family Welfare department on August 29, he directed the authorities to shift all the services including out-patient and in-patient divisions to the 200-bed multi-specialty hospital with immediate effect. With this, the Commissioner has directed to close the government Maternity and Child Care hospital permanently.
Known philanthropist of Udupi, Haji Abdulla had constructed the hospital in 1930s for the poor on a sprawling four acres of land. Later, the state government and the Health and Family Welfare department have agreed to give the land to the BRS Health and Research Institute Private Limited for 30 years lease. The BRS Health and Research Institute Private Limited has constructed 200 –bed hospital instead of 70-bed hospital on land behind the Mahatma Gandhi Government Primary School and named the hospital after ‘Karnataka Government Koosamma Shambhu Shetty Haji Abdulla Memorial Mother and Child Care Hospital’. The government has said that like in the previous hospital, all the services would be free in the new hospital also.
As per the agreement, the BRS Institute would demolish the existing Maternity and Child care Hospital and construct 400-bed capacity Centre Of Excellence Hospital (Super Specialty Hospital) and Community Health Facilities shortly.
Four docs hired
Total 31 staff including six specialist doctors were working in the previous Government Maternity and Child Care Hospital. Among them , the government has deputed four doctors including two pediatricians and two gynecologists to the new hospital on temporary basis. But he did not get any order for the remaining 27 staff including two doctors, said district surgeon Dr Madhusudhan Nayak.
As there was scarcity of doctors and staff, he had appealed the state government to depute all the staffs to the district hospital. Once again, he had written to the government seeking deputation of all the staff, he said.
Among in-patients, except the patients who will discharge in a couple of days, all the patients would be shifted to the new hospital, Dr Nayak said.
The government has asked him to send some of the equipment to the Vijayapura hospital and they would be sent. For remaining equipment, the decision would be taken as per the direction of the government, he said.
Though five maternity and gynecologists were appointed in the new hospital, two government doctors were deputed as the hospital may require them during emergency situation. As the new hospital did not get eligible pediatricians, two doctors were deputed from the old hospital, he said.
Scholar G Rajashekar said that the government benefit was the right of the people. But the service to be provided by the private would become a donation. The poor people have been getting the benefits as their rights and now onwards such facilities would not continue in the new hospital. It might affect the poor patients, he said.
4.64 lakh patients got treatment in last three years
Though the hospital has been serving in the centre of the city for the last eight decades, in the last three years, the hospital has treated 4, 64,176 poor patients. Among them, 4, 32, 756 patients were given treatment as out-patients and 31,420 got treatment as in-patients.
During 2016-17, total 1, 67, 203 out-patients and 11,925 in-patients, 1,79,761 out-patents and 13, 708 in-patients in 2017-18 and till August 2018-19, 85,792 out-patients and 5787 in-patients have got the treatment in the hospital.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Karnataka Assembly passes bill on Palace Grounds amid opposition protest
Bengaluru, Mar 6 (PTI): The Karnataka Assembly on Thursday passed the Bangalore Palace (Utilisation and Regulation of Land) Bill, reaffirming state ownership over 472 acres and 16 guntas of land here, amid protests by the opposition BJP.
During the discussion, Karnataka Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister H K Patil said the state government would have to provide Rs 200 crore worth of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) for each acre of land, which means that for 15 acres, Rs 3,000 crore worth of TDR would be issued.
“If we accept it, then this 2-km stretch of road will become the costliest road in the world. If we accept it then how are we going to develop the city in later stages? How will you carry out development works?” asked Patil.
He also pointed out that this question was raised not only under the Congress government but also during the previous BJP regime.
However, the BJP-led cabinet has opposed the project.
ALSO READ: Budget session: Law Min. HK Patil introduces Microfinance bill in Karnataka assembly
“Suppose we agree to it then, what will be the valuation of the 472 acres? It will be lakhs and lakhs of crores of rupees. Can we accept?” Patil wondered.
The Minister said the government had previously exercised its executive powers to issue an ordinance, which was approved by the Governor. Now the government is bringing a bill with two amendments.
“In this bill, we have made provisions either to develop or drop the road development work,” Patil explained.
However, BJP state president B Y Vijayendra and BJP MLA Arvind Bellad opposed the move, alleging that the government was targetting Yaduveer Krishna Datta Chamaraja Wadiyar, the scion of the Mysuru royal family, and the BJP MP from Mysuru-Kodagu constituency out of political vendetta.
“We talk of 472 acres of Mysuru Maharaja but here there are many Maharajas who too own 400 acres, 500 acres and thousands of acres of land, which is known to everyone,” Bellad said.
He slammed the Congress government, saying political power should not be misused for personal vendetta.
“Why (the then Deputy Chief Minister) Siddaramaiah brought the law in 1996 pertaining to the Bangalore Palace? Why are you setting eyes on the Bangalore Palace?” he asked.
Vijayendra charged that Wadiyar won the election on BJP ticket so the state government realised that it should acquire it.
“This bill has been brought for political vengeance. We are not discussing whether Rs 3,000 crore is exorbitant or not but the moment Yaduveer became MP, the state government woke up. You should be ashamed. This house should not be used for political vendetta,” he said.
Intervening, Minister Priyank Kharge said Vijayendra should not have raised it because the intention behind building the road was noble.
According to him, the BJP too had the same plan when it was in power.
He sought to know whether thousands of crores of rupees be spent on a road which should have cost significantly less.
In response, BJP MLA B A Basavaraj (Byrathi) said issuing TDR will not be a burden on the state government and appealed to the ruling Congress to reconsider its stance.
Minister Ramalinga Reddy too explained that the Karnataka government acquired the entire land way back in 1996.
The Mysuru royal family went to the High Court, which gave ruling in favour of the state government. The royal family then approached the Supreme Court, where the case is still going on, the Minister pointed out.
“The final judgment is pending in the SC to decide whether the acquisition was right or wrong. If the SC says it’s the royal family’s property then let it be so. If the order is in the state government’s favour then we can take a decision. The bill is only about it,” Reddy explained.
Speaker U T Khader then called for a voice vote and the bill was passed by the Assembly amidst opposition BJP’s discontent.
