26 people were killed in Pahalgam as Modi govt did not provide security: Kharge
Hosapete (Karnataka), May 20 (PTI): Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge on Tuesday alleged that 26 tourists were killed in the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack as the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government did not provide security there.
He reiterated his claim that Modi had cancelled his Kashmir visit after receiving an intelligence report ahead of the Pahalgam terror attack last month.
Further, he targeted the BJP government over the MP delegations that will fan out to various countries post Operation Sindoor, alleging the party was not consulted on the matter.
The Centre picking Congress MP Shashi Tharoor to lead one of the delegations has resulted in a major row as he was not among the four leaders named by the opposition party to be part of the MPs' group.
"Twenty-six people were murdered in Pahalgam because the Modi government did not provide security there. The tourists who had gone there were not given security by the police, border force, or military," Kharge alleged.
Addressing a large gathering here, he said, "26 people were killed, but still Modi did not speak a word about it (lack of security) and spoke only what he wanted to.”
Stating that he has still not received answers to the questions he had raised recently, the AICC chief said the PM was supposed to go to Kashmir on April 17, but the intelligence department asked him not to proceed and cancel the visit, citing possible trouble there.
"When you knew it—when you cancelled your programme of travelling to Kashmir on April 17—why didn’t you tell tourists about it through the police? Why didn't you ask them not to go, as there might be some trouble? If you had told them, 26 lives would have been saved," he added.
He was speaking at an event to mark the Karnataka Congress government's two years in office. At the event, over 1.11 lakh title deeds were distributed to eligible beneficiaries whose "undocumented habitations" have been declared revenue villages.
Speaking on tensions with Pakistan, Kharge said Pakistan always wants to trouble India as they are weak, and they have tried to attack the country with China's support.
"Our country will never tolerate such things. We are united on this. So we extended support to the government in the fight against those who oppose our country. The country is important; then comes religion, caste, and other things," he said.
However, what has happened now is that Modi has become important, and the country comes next. "Special information is given to save him (PM), but not to protect common people and the poor…"
Noting that Modi recently, through the government, said that a delegation of MPs should be sent to foreign countries, Kharge said, "He did not ask us. Unilaterally, he said it, but for the sake of the country, we did not say anything, and we are sending our representatives as part of a delegation to foreign countries to speak for our country.”
Saving the country is the Congress’s aim, and it doesn’t look at party lines or credit or discredit in this regard. "We have to save the country, its people."
"We (Congress) got freedom for the country that was under slavery for years. Saving it is our duty. We prepared the Constitution for this country under the leadership of Ambedkar and Nehru—saving it is our responsibility and duty, and we will do it. BJP only lies," he added.
When all parties meet to discuss the country, Modi will be in Bihar for poll campaigning, Kharge said. All-party meetings were called twice, but the PM did not attend them.
"If you had patriotism, why didn't you attend that meeting after calling us. What is the reason. If we don't go to such meetings, we are traitors, but he, the one who doesn't attend, is a patriot. Just by making speeches, a country's welfare is not possible; everyone has to be taken together," he said.
Hitting out at the BJP for its Madhya Pradesh minister's remarks on Col Sofia Qureshi, Kharge said, "What kind of punishment should be given to such people? Comments are being made against a woman who is serving in the country's armed forces."
Congress has sought the minister’s resignation, but Modi is still keeping him.
"Remove the traitors in the BJP first and then speak…she (Sofia Qureshi) was targeted as her name had Qureshi. The BJP is filled with such bad people. Modi, first remove them," he said.
Congress fights for the country, and the BJP alone has not taken any contract for it, Kharge said.
Former PMs, the late Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi have sacrificed their lives for the country, and Mahatma Gandhi too sacrificed his life.
"You try to blame such a party and book cases against its leaders through agencies like the ED," he said.
Pointing to the ED case involving Congress's newspaper, National Herald, Kharge further said the notices are issued against his party leaders by the ED, Income Tax, and CBI with the aim of weakening them.
"But it is impossible. The Congress party will never bow down to anyone. We have given everything for the country, but those who are in power have not fought for the country. They are running a maladministration in the country," he charged.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Single higher education regulator bill tabled in LS; Oppn flags ‘centralisation,' JPC likely
New Delhi: A bill to set up a 13-member body to regulate institutions of higher education was introduced in the Lok Sabha on Monday.
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan introduced the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, which seeks to establish an overarching higher education commission along with three councils for regulation, accreditation, and ensuring academic standards for universities and higher education institutions in India.
Meanwhile, the move drew strong opposition, with members warning that it could weaken institutional autonomy and result in excessive centralisation of higher education in India.
The Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, 2025, earlier known as the Higher Education Council of India (HECI) Bill, has been introduced in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
The proposed legislation seeks to merge three existing regulatory bodies, the University Grants Commission (UGC), the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), and the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), into a single unified body called the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan.
At present, the UGC regulates non-technical higher education institutions, the AICTE oversees technical education, and the NCTE governs teacher education in India.
Under the proposed framework, the new commission will function through three separate councils responsible for regulation, accreditation, and the maintenance of academic standards across universities and higher education institutions in the country.
According to the Bill, the present challenges faced by higher educational institutions due to the multiplicity of regulators having non-harmonised regulatory approval protocols will be done away with.
The higher education commission, which will be headed by a chairperson appointed by the President of India, will cover all central universities and colleges under it, institutes of national importance functioning under the administrative purview of the Ministry of Education, including IITs, NITs, IISc, IISERs, IIMs, and IIITs.
At present, IITs and IIMs are not regulated by the University Grants Commission (UGC).
Government to refer bill to JPC; Oppn slams it
The government has expressed its willingness to refer it to a joint committee after several members of the Lok Sabha expressed strong opposition to the Bill, stating that they were not given time to study its provisions.
Responding to the opposition, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the government intends to refer the Bill to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for detailed examination.
Congress Lok Sabha MP Manish Tewari warned that the Bill could result in “excessive centralisation” of higher education. He argued that the proposed law violates the constitutional division of legislative powers between the Union and the states.
According to him, the Bill goes beyond setting academic standards and intrudes into areas such as administration, affiliation, and the establishment and closure of university campuses. These matters, he said, fall under Entry 25 of the Concurrent List and Entry 32 of the State List, which cover the incorporation and regulation of state universities.
Tewari further stated that the Bill suffers from “excessive delegation of legislative power” to the proposed commission. He pointed out that crucial aspects such as accreditation frameworks, degree-granting powers, penalties, institutional autonomy, and even the supersession of institutions are left to be decided through rules, regulations, and executive directions. He argued that this amounts to a violation of established constitutional principles governing delegated legislation.
Under the Bill, the regulatory council will have the power to impose heavy penalties on higher education institutions for violating provisions of the Act or related rules. Penalties range from ₹10 lakh to ₹75 lakh for repeated violations, while establishing an institution without approval from the commission or the state government could attract a fine of up to ₹2 crore.
Concerns were also raised by members from southern states over the Hindi nomenclature of the Bill. N.K. Premachandran, an MP from the Revolutionary Socialist Party representing Kollam in Kerala, said even the name of the Bill was difficult to pronounce.
He pointed out that under Article 348 of the Constitution, the text of any Bill introduced in Parliament must be in English unless Parliament decides otherwise.
DMK MP T.M. Selvaganapathy also criticised the government for naming laws and schemes only in Hindi. He said the Constitution clearly mandates that the nomenclature of a Bill should be in English so that citizens across the country can understand its intent.
Congress MP S. Jothimani from Tamil Nadu’s Karur constituency described the Bill as another attempt to impose Hindi and termed it “an attack on federalism.”
_vb_22.jpeg)
