Bengaluru: Actor Chetan Ahimsa, known for making headlines owing to his controversial remarks, has now triggered a fresh controversy by allegedly posting derogatory social media posts about Nadaprabhu Kempegowda. A case in connection with the matter was filed by Lawyer R. L. N. Murthy at the Seshadripuram Police Station.

Ahimsa wrote on his ‘X’ account, “Tale of Two Warriors: Kempegowda-a minor historical figure who is now a prominent Karnataka icon due to the influence of feudal caste lobbies. Tipu Sultan — a historic juggernaut whose Muslim birth has impeded his present-day recognition……Sad birth community given more importance than societal contributions.”

ALSO READ: Kolar: SC/ST students in Malur residential school made to clean septic tank

Subsequently, Lawyer RLN Murthy stating that Ahimsa’s remarks have caused disrespect and insult to Kempegowda filed a complaint, in response the Police is learnt to have registered a NCR(Non-Cognizable Report).

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi: A Public Interest Litigation has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking the constitution of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) headed by a former judge to probe allegations of large-scale manipulation of voters’ lists in the Bengaluru Central constituency during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, as raised by Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi.

The petition, filed by Advocate Rohit Pandey through Advocate Kausar Raza Faridi, also sought directions restraining any further revision or finalisation of electoral rolls until compliance with the Court’s directions and an independent audit. It further sought binding guidelines to ensure transparency in the preparation and publication of electoral rolls, including mechanisms to detect duplicate or fictitious entries.

The petitioner cited Rahul Gandhi’s press conference on August 7 and claimed to have independently verified the allegations, pointing to 40,009 invalid voters and 10,452 duplicate entries in Bengaluru Central. Instances of voters holding multiple EPIC numbers across states, identical addresses and fathers’ names, and around 80 voters registered at a single small house were also highlighted.

The plea argued that such manipulation undermines Articles 324, 325, and 326 of the Constitution, distorts the principle of “one person, one vote,” and infringes the rights to equality and democratic participation under Articles 14 and 21.