Mutalik warns to lay siege Belagavi Mini Vidhana Soudha if Datta Peetha is not handed over to Hindus
Dattamala Abhiyana
Chikmagaluru, October 28: Sri Rama Sene national president Pramod Mutalik warned of lay sieging the Belagavi Mini Vidhana Soudha during the Belagavi Session if the Datta Peetha was not handed over to Hindus within the Winter Session to be held in Belagavi.
Addressing a religious convention after the Shobha Yatra organized as part of the Dattamala Abhiyan at Bola Rameshwara Temple here on Sunday, Mutalik said that in the name of communal harmony, the Hindu ideology was being targeted without giving scope for Hindu ideology in the Hindu nation. Rama Mandir was the adorable god for hundred crore Hindus in the country. But both the central government and the Supreme Court were not in a position to listen the voice of hundred crore people of the country, he said.
Court interference not necessary
The Supreme Court has allowed the entry of women into 800-year-old Ayyappa Swamy temple in Kerala much against to the tradition and custom being followed since centuries. The courts should not interfere in the religious issues. The Supreme Court should reconsider its verdict on Sabarimala temple. There was atheist government in Kerala where Hindus were being converted. The Central Government should dismiss the Communist government in Kerala and impose the President’s rule. The Kerala government had backed three women who tried to enter the temple, he alleged.
The BJP has gained the Datta Peetha benefit. They were happy if the justice was ensured when BJP was in power. Previous government had allowed a Maulvi to offer pooja at Datta Peetha, for which the BJP was responsible, he alleged.
When BJP was in power, it did not go to the court and appoint right advocate. As a result, Maulvi was offering pooja. As former prime minister H.D Deve Gowda had solved the Hubballi Idgah maidan issue amicably, Chief Minister H.D Kumaraswamy should solve Datta Peetha issue and handover it to Hindus and shift the tombs to Nagenahalli, he said.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
CJI calls for 'unified judicial policy', use of technology to converge practices across courts
Jaisalmer (PTI): Pushing for a "unified judicial policy", Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on Saturday said technology can help align standards and practices across courts, creating a "seamless experience" for citizens, regardless of their location.
He said high courts -- due to the federal structure -- have had their own practices and technological capacities, and "regional barriers" can be broken down with technology to create a more unified judicial ecosystem.
Delivering the keynote address at the West Zone Regional Conference in Jaisalmer, Kant proposed the idea of a "national judicial ecosystem" and called for an overhaul of India's judicial system with the integration of technology.
"Today, as technology reduces geographical barriers and enables convergence, it invites us to think of justice not as regional systems operating in parallel, but as one national ecosystem with shared standards, seamless interfaces, and coordinated goals," he said.
He emphasised how the role of technology in the judiciary has evolved over time.
"Technology is no longer merely an administrative convenience. It has evolved into a constitutional instrument that strengthens equality before the law, expands access to justice, and enhances institutional efficiency," he said, highlighting how digital tools can bridge gaps in the judicial system.
Kant pointed out that technology enables the judiciary to overcome the limitations of physical distance and bureaucratic hurdles.
"It allows the judiciary to transcend physical barriers and bureaucratic rigidities to deliver outcomes that are timely, transparent and principled," he said, adding that the effective use of technology can modernise the delivery of justice and make it more accessible to citizens across the country.
The CJI called for implementing a "unified judicial policy".
He said India's judicial system has long been shaped by its federal structure, and different high courts have their own practices and technological capacities.
"India's vast diversity has led to different high courts evolving their own practices, administrative priorities and technological capacities. This variation, though natural in a federal democracy, has resulted in uneven experiences for litigants across the country," he said.
Kant underscored that predictability is crucial for building trust in the judicial system.
"A core expectation citizens place upon the courts is predictability," he said, adding that citizens should not only expect fair treatment but also consistency in how cases are handled across the country.
He pointed to the potential of technology in improving predictability.
"Technology enables us to track systemic delays and make problems visible rather than concealed," he said.
By identifying areas where delays occur, such as in bail matters or cases involving certain types of disputes, courts can take targeted action to address these issues and improve efficiency, Kant said.
The CJI explained that data-driven tools could identify the reasons behind delays or bottlenecks, allowing for faster, more focused solutions.
"Technology enables prioritisation by flagging sensitive case categories, monitoring pendency in real time and ensuring transparent listing protocols," he said.
Justice Surya Kant also discussed the importance of prioritising urgent cases where delays could result in significant harm. He highlighted his recent administrative order that ensures urgent cases, such as bail petitions or habeas corpus cases, are listed within two days of curing defects.
"Where delay causes deep harm, the system must respond with urgency," he stated, explaining that technology can help courts identify and expedite such cases.
Kant also raised the issue of the clarity of judicial decisions.
He noted that many litigants, despite winning cases, often struggle to understand the terms of their judgment due to complex legal language.
"Although the orders had gone in their favour, they remained unsure of what relief they had actually secured because the language was too technical, vague or evasive to understand," he said.
He advocated for more uniformity in how judgments are written.
"A unified judicial approach must therefore extend to how we communicate outcomes," he said.
The CJI also discussed the role of AI and digital tools in improving case management. He pointed to the potential of AI-based research assistants and digital case management systems to streamline judicial processes.
"Emerging technological tools are now capable of performing once-unthinkable functions. They can highlight missing precedent references, cluster similar legal questions, and simplify factual narration," he said, explaining how these technologies can help judges make more consistent decisions.
He also highlighted tools like the National Judicial Data Grid and e-courts, which are already helping to standardise processes like case filings and tracking.
Kant reiterated that the integration of technology into the judicial process is not just about improving efficiency but about upholding the integrity of the system and strengthening public trust.
"The measure of innovation is not the complexity of the software we deploy, but the simplicity with which a citizen understands the outcome of their case and believes that justice has been served," he said.
