Mandya: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) leader Kalladka Prabhakar Bhat has been booked by the Mandya Police under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) following a complaint filed by Najma Nazeer, a local social worker.

The complaint stems from Bhat's controversial remarks made during the 'Sankeerthana Yatra' held as part of Hanuman Jayanti celebrations at Srirangapatna taluk, Mandya district, on Sunday, December 24.

Bhat's statements lauded Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government and its actions, particularly the criminalization of the practice of triple talaq. He asserted that Muslim women were granted "permanent husbands" by criminalizing triple talaq, claiming that before this intervention, Muslim women did not have stable marriages. Bhat's remarks drew attention to the 2019 parliamentary approval of a Bill that criminalized the Muslim practice of instant divorce.

ALSO READ: Bengaluru top-cop issues guidelines, warnings ahead of New Year celebrations in state capital

Addressing the hijab ban issue in educational institutions, Bhat warned against withdrawing the ban and challenged Karnataka's Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, questioning his authority to lift the ban. He also issued threats and challenges to a Muslim student, Muskan Khan, who had defended wearing hijab in educational institutions earlier in the year.

In his statements, Bhat emphasized the importance of Hindu population growth, expressing concerns about Hindus becoming a minority. He suggested that if the trend continued, there would be chants of "Pakistan Zindabad."

The Mandya Police filed a case against Bhat under sections 354, 295, 509, 506, 153(A), 295, 295(A), and 298 of the IPC based on the complaint filed by social worker Najma Nazeer.

Get all the latest, breaking news from Karnataka in a single click. CLICK HERE to get all the latest news from Karnataka.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Wednesday said the 11 documents required to be submitted by an elector for Bihar's special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral roll as opposed to seven documents in summary revision conducted previously showed the exercise was "voter friendly".

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, which resumed hearing on a batch of pleas challenging the June 24 decision of Election Commission to conduct SIR in poll bound Bihar, said despite petitioners' arguments that non-acceptance of Aadhaar was exclusionary, it appeared the large number of documents was "actually inclusionary".

"The number of documents in summary revision conducted earlier in the state was seven and in SIR it is 11, which shows it is voter friendly. We understand your arguments that non-acceptance of Aadhaar is exclusionary but a high number of documents is actually inclusionary," the bench said.

The top court noted electors were required to submit any one of the 11 documents in the list.

Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, disagreed and submitted the number of documents may be high but they had the least coverage.

Giving an example of passport availability with the electors, Singhvi said it was only one to two per cent in Bihar and they have no provision for permanent resident certificates given in the state.

"If we see the availability of documents with the population in Bihar it can be seen the coverage is very low," he said.

The bench said the coverage of 36 lakh of passport holders in the state appears to be good.

"The list of documents is prepared normally after taking feedback from various government departments to ensure maximum coverage," Justice Bagchi pointed out.

On August 12, the top court said inclusion and exclusion of citizens or non-citizens from the electoral rolls was within the remit of the Election Commission and backed its stand to not accept Aadhaar and voter cards as conclusive proof of citizenship in the SIR of voters' list in Bihar.

As the row over the ongoing SIR escalated inside and outside Parliament, the top court also observed that the dispute was "largely a trust deficit issue” since the Election Commission(EC) has claimed that roughly 6.5 crore people of the total 7.9 crore voting population in poll-bound Bihar didn't have to file any documents for them or their parents featured in the 2003 electoral rolls.