Siddaramaiah writes to FM Nirmala Sitharaman, urges immediate release of Special Grants to Karnataka
Bengaluru: Chief Minister of Karnataka, Siddaramaiah, has penned a letter to Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, highlighting concerns and making an urgent plea for the release of Special Grants and State Specific Grants for Karnataka. The letter emphasized the critical financial situation faced by the state and urged the Finance Minister to consider the recommendations of the 15th Finance Commission.
In the detailed letter, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah expressed concern over the reduction in Karnataka's share in tax devolution recommended by the 15th Finance Commission. The share has been reduced to 3.647% of the divisible pool for the period between 2020-21 and 2025-26, down from the 4.71% recommended by the previous 14th Finance Commission. This drastic 23% decrease in allocation is attributed to the reduction in devolution share.
Another issue raised by Siddaramaiah is the adverse impact of the Income-Distance criteria adopted by the Commission. He pointed out that the new methodology for computing the Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) under the 2011-12 series has disproportionately increased Karnataka's GSDP by over 30%, significantly higher than the average increase of less than 9% observed in other states. This change has led to a decrease in the State's standing, impacting its share in the Income-Distance parameter from 4.2% as per the 14th Finance Commission to a mere 1.1%. Consequently, the State's devolution share has also decreased from 4.71% to 3.64%.
Additionally, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah highlighted the absence of proportional contribution of the growth in GSDP attributed to IT-related services to State taxes. He underscored the importance of acknowledging this discrepancy and addressing the implications on financial allocations.
The letter further stated that the reduction in tax devolution share has led to a substantial decrease in total tax devolution to Karnataka over the past four years, amounting to Rs. 37,011 crore between FY 2020-21 and FY 2023-24.
Chief Minister Siddaramaiah also drew attention to the unfulfilled recommendations of the 15th Finance Commission regarding Special Grants and State Specific Grants. Despite the Commission's recommendation of Rs. 5,495 crore for Special Grants in 2020-21 and Rs. 6,000 crores for specific projects, these grants have not yet been released to the state. This delay has further strained Karnataka's already fragile fiscal position, the letter added.
Siddaramaiah urgently urged Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman to reconsider the Commission's recommendations and release the Special Grants and State Specific Grants to Karnataka. He underscored the critical need for these funds to address the State's financial constraints and maintain fiscal stability.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Single higher education regulator bill tabled in LS; Oppn flags ‘centralisation,' JPC likely
New Delhi: A bill to set up a 13-member body to regulate institutions of higher education was introduced in the Lok Sabha on Monday.
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan introduced the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, which seeks to establish an overarching higher education commission along with three councils for regulation, accreditation, and ensuring academic standards for universities and higher education institutions in India.
Meanwhile, the move drew strong opposition, with members warning that it could weaken institutional autonomy and result in excessive centralisation of higher education in India.
The Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, 2025, earlier known as the Higher Education Council of India (HECI) Bill, has been introduced in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
The proposed legislation seeks to merge three existing regulatory bodies, the University Grants Commission (UGC), the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), and the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), into a single unified body called the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan.
At present, the UGC regulates non-technical higher education institutions, the AICTE oversees technical education, and the NCTE governs teacher education in India.
Under the proposed framework, the new commission will function through three separate councils responsible for regulation, accreditation, and the maintenance of academic standards across universities and higher education institutions in the country.
According to the Bill, the present challenges faced by higher educational institutions due to the multiplicity of regulators having non-harmonised regulatory approval protocols will be done away with.
The higher education commission, which will be headed by a chairperson appointed by the President of India, will cover all central universities and colleges under it, institutes of national importance functioning under the administrative purview of the Ministry of Education, including IITs, NITs, IISc, IISERs, IIMs, and IIITs.
At present, IITs and IIMs are not regulated by the University Grants Commission (UGC).
Government to refer bill to JPC; Oppn slams it
The government has expressed its willingness to refer it to a joint committee after several members of the Lok Sabha expressed strong opposition to the Bill, stating that they were not given time to study its provisions.
Responding to the opposition, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the government intends to refer the Bill to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for detailed examination.
Congress Lok Sabha MP Manish Tewari warned that the Bill could result in “excessive centralisation” of higher education. He argued that the proposed law violates the constitutional division of legislative powers between the Union and the states.
According to him, the Bill goes beyond setting academic standards and intrudes into areas such as administration, affiliation, and the establishment and closure of university campuses. These matters, he said, fall under Entry 25 of the Concurrent List and Entry 32 of the State List, which cover the incorporation and regulation of state universities.
Tewari further stated that the Bill suffers from “excessive delegation of legislative power” to the proposed commission. He pointed out that crucial aspects such as accreditation frameworks, degree-granting powers, penalties, institutional autonomy, and even the supersession of institutions are left to be decided through rules, regulations, and executive directions. He argued that this amounts to a violation of established constitutional principles governing delegated legislation.
Under the Bill, the regulatory council will have the power to impose heavy penalties on higher education institutions for violating provisions of the Act or related rules. Penalties range from ₹10 lakh to ₹75 lakh for repeated violations, while establishing an institution without approval from the commission or the state government could attract a fine of up to ₹2 crore.
Concerns were also raised by members from southern states over the Hindi nomenclature of the Bill. N.K. Premachandran, an MP from the Revolutionary Socialist Party representing Kollam in Kerala, said even the name of the Bill was difficult to pronounce.
He pointed out that under Article 348 of the Constitution, the text of any Bill introduced in Parliament must be in English unless Parliament decides otherwise.
DMK MP T.M. Selvaganapathy also criticised the government for naming laws and schemes only in Hindi. He said the Constitution clearly mandates that the nomenclature of a Bill should be in English so that citizens across the country can understand its intent.
Congress MP S. Jothimani from Tamil Nadu’s Karur constituency described the Bill as another attempt to impose Hindi and termed it “an attack on federalism.”
_vb_22.jpeg)
