Uttar Pradesh and Bihar worst in COVID reporting, Karnataka best, Stanford study finds
New Delhi: There is a disparity in Covid-19 reporting by states and union territories in India, found a new study conducted by researchers from Stanford University.
While the best Covid-19 reporting has been by Karnataka, the worst has been by Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, according to a COVID-19 data reporting index created by the researchers.
The study is not yet peer-reviewed and has been published as a preprint in medRxiv on 21 July.
Researchers ranked the states according to their availability, accessibility, granularity, and privacy. This framework was used to calculate a Covid-19 Data Reporting Score (CDRS) for 29 states during a two-week period — from 19 May to 1 June. CDRS ranged from 0 (lowest) to 1 (highest).
Researchers found that the CDRS varied from 0.61 (good) in Karnataka to 0.0 (poor) in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh.
Overall, the quality of Covid-19 reporting in India was only 0.26, which showed poor reporting across the country.
States that reported less than 10 total confirmed cases as of 18 May were excluded from the study.
Each state reported the first case at least a month before they were studied, which means they had at least a month’s time to do an assessment to build a high-quality data reporting system.
According to the health ministry data, as of 18 May, the total number of confirmed cases in India was about 96,000. Top ten states with the highest confirmed cases contributed to 91 percent of that total confirmed cases in the country.
Among those top 10 states, Tamil Nadu is the only state with a high CDRS at 0.51, the study found.
“This suggests that states with the highest number of cases also tend to have poor Covid-19 data reporting, which could further exacerbate the pandemic challenges,” wrote the researchers.
10 states did not report data divided by age, gender
The Indian Council of Medical Research’s (ICMR) referral form for Covid-19 requires health workers to record data on age, gender, district, and comorbidities. Yet the study found 10 states that did not report any data divided by age, gender, comorbidities or districts.
District-level data keep the people informed about the gravity of the situation in their neighbourhood and can help them identify how much risk they are at and take precautions accordingly. Also, granular details like age, gender and comorbidities can help the scientific community study the impact of these factors on disease progression.
The study found only 10 states provided a visual representation of the trend in Covid-19. Assam and Gujarat gave only the total number of cases, while Kerala gave total cases and the Covid trends too.
A graphical representation of the information makes it more interpretable and accessible to the general people.
In addition, the researchers found that Punjab and Chandigarh compromised the privacy of individuals, who were under quarantine, by releasing their personal information on official websites.
Best and worst states for Covid-19 reporting
The best reporting was by Karnataka (0.61), followed by Kerala (0.52), Odisha (0.51), Puducherry (0.51), and Tamil Nadu (0.51).
Uttar Pradesh (0.0), Bihar (0.0), Meghalaya (0.13), Himachal Pradesh (0.13), and Andaman and Nicobar Islands (0.17) scored the lowest in Covid reporting.
The top 5 states in CDRS provided a dashboard that showed the trend of Covid-19 data graphically and also provided district-wise stratification of the total confirmed, recovered, and deaths. However, none of them stratified the data according to age, gender, comorbidities — all factors that impact the death rate.
Among the states with the lowest CDRS score, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, did not publish any Covid data on their government or health department websites.
Bihar released data only on Twitter, which is not an accessible or reliable method of disseminating information.
Himachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Andaman & Nicobar Islands reported only the total count, but did not report the daily count, trend graphics and granular data.
Researchers also found a correlation between the states’ performance on sustainable development goals (SDG) for health and well-being that includes maternal mortality and availability of health workers, and the Covid-19 health reporting data. Those doing better in SDGs tended to do better in Covid-19 reporting too, the study found.
Disparity reveals lack of unified system for reporting
The disparity in CDRS across states highlights three things — a lack of a unified framework for Covid-19 data that makes it difficult to coordinate an effective nationwide response, a lack of coordination among states and inequality in access to public health information based on the state where the person resides.
CDRS helps in identifying the differences in the quality of Covid-19 data reporting across India and reveals that “there is tremendous scope for all states to improve”, according to the researchers.
The score helps the states recognise their strengths and weaknesses in each category. “States that score high in a category can serve as role models to the other states,” they wrote.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
HC questions Delhi govt over failure to regulate sale of old vehicles, refers to Red Fort blast
New Delhi (PTI): The Delhi High Court questioned the city government on Wednesday over its failure to regulate the sale and transfer of used vehicles, while pointing out that in a recent bomb blast near the Red Fort, a second-hand car was used, making the issue more significant.
A bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela asked the Delhi government to file a detailed response on the issue of regulating authorised dealers of registered vehicles.
"A car changes four hands but the original owner has not changed. Therefore, what happens? That man (the original owner) goes to the slaughterhouse? What is this? How are you permitting this? You will take a call when two-three more bomb blasts take place?" the bench asked the Delhi government's counsel.
The bomb blast near the iconic Mughal-era monument was carried out using a second-hand car, making the issue even more significant, it said.
The court listed the matter for further hearing in January 2026.
ALSO READ: Nightclub fire: Goa court remands Luthra brothers in police custody for five days
The court was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) plea filed by an organisation, Towards Happy Earth Foundation, highlighting the challenges in the implementation of rules 55A to 55H of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, introduced in December 2022 to regulate authorised dealers of registered vehicles.
While the rules were intended to bring accountability to the second-hand vehicle market, the petitioner's counsel argued that they have failed in practice due to regulatory gaps and procedural hurdles.
The plea said there is a major gap in the amended framework, that is, the absence of any statutory mechanism for reporting dealer-to-dealer transfers.
"In reality, most used vehicles pass through multiple dealers before reaching the final buyer, but the rules recognise only the first transfer to the initial authorised dealer.
"As a result, the chain of custody breaks after the first step, defeating the very purpose of accountability," the petition said.
It added that because of these gaps, only a very small percentage of dealers across India have been able to obtain authorised dealer registration and in Delhi, not a single dealer has got it.
Consequently, lakhs of vehicles continue to circulate without any record of who is actually in possession of those, it said.
The plea said only a small fraction of India's estimated 30,000 to 40,000 used-vehicle dealers are registered under the authorised-dealer framework.
The petition also pointed out that the 11-year-old vehicle used in the November 10 bomb blast near the Red Fort was sold several times but was still registered in its original owner's name.
The blast near the Red Fort had claimed 15 lives.
