WhatsApp unveils 'tipline' to tackle fake news
New Delhi: WhatsApp Tuesday unveiled its 'Checkpoint Tipline', where people can check the authenticity of information received as the messaging giant looks to crack down on fake news ahead of the general election in the country.
"Launched by PROTO, an India-based media skilling startup, this tipline will help create a database of rumours to study misinformation during elections for Checkpoint - a research project commissioned and technically assisted by WhatsApp," the Facebook-owned company said in a statement.
It added that starting Tuesday, people in India can submit misinformation or rumours they receive to the Checkpoint Tipline on WhatsApp (+91-9643-000-888).
Once a WhatsApp user shares a suspicious message with the tipline, PROTO's verification centre will seek to respond and inform the user if the claim made in message shared is verified or not.
"The response will indicate if information is classified as true, false, misleading, disputed or out of scope and include any other related information that is available," the statement said.
This centre is equipped to review content in the form of pictures, video links or text and will cover English and four regional languages - Hindi, Telugu, Bengali and Malayalam.
PROTO will also look at working with organisations at grassroot level to submit misinformation circulating across different regions in India during the election period.
Facebook, which counts India as one of its largest markets with over 200 million users, had faced flak from the Indian government after a series of mob-lynching incidents, triggered by rumours circulating on WhatsApp, claimed lives last year.
Under pressure to stop rumours and fake news, WhatsApp had last year restricted forwarding messages to five chats at once. It has also been putting out advertisements in newspapers and running television and radio campaigns offering tips to users on how to spot misinformation.
With ensuing general elections, the Indian government had warned social media platforms of strong action if any attempt was made to influence the country's electoral process through undesirable means.
Interestingly, the Indian government through proposed changes in IT rules is seeking to make social media platforms more accountable by mandating them to introduce tools that can identify and disable "unlawful content".
One of the amendments being mulled in the IT intermediary rules (meant for online and social media platforms) will require them to enable tracing out of such originators of information as needed by government agencies that are legally authorised.
However, WhatsApp has so far resisted the government's demand for identifying message originators, arguing that such a move would undermine the end-to-end encryption and the private nature of the platform, creating potential for serious misuse.
In its statement on Tuesday, WhatsApp said Dig Deeper Media and Meedan - which have previously worked on misinformation-related projects around the world - are helping PROTO to develop the verification and research frameworks for India.
Meedan has developed the technology to support the verification of rumours and will maintain the database of such content that have been processed.
To do so, they have expanded their check platform (developed for recent elections in Mexico and France) and integrated it with the WhatsApp Business API, to receive and respond to messages at scale.
"The goal of this project is to study the misinformation phenomenon at scale natively in WhatsApp. As more data flows in, we will be able to identify the most susceptible or affected issues, locations, languages, regions, and more," PROTO founders Ritvvij Parrikh and Nasr ul Hadi said.
The verification reports PROTO sends back will encourage grassroots-level "listening posts" to send more signals for analysis, they added.
Following the project, PROTO also plans to submit learnings to the International Center for Journalists to help other organisations learn from the design and operations of this project.
"The research from this initiative will help create a global benchmarks for those wishing to tackle misinformation in their own markets," Fergus Bell, founder and CEO, Dig Deeper Media, said.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
SC rejects pleas of Anil Ambani challenging Bombay HC order on declaration of accounts as fraud
New Delhi (PTI): Observing that crores of public monies had been siphoned off, the Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed industrialist Anil Ambani's three separate pleas, challenging the Bombay High Court order that allowed the proceedings, initiated by banks against him and Reliance Communications Ltd to classify their bank accounts as fraud, to continue.
A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi permitted Ambani to pursue his plea before the high court's single judge bench against the banks' show cause notices to declare the accounts as fraud.
"Hard-earned public money to the tune of thousands of crores has been siphoned. Did you make good losses to banks and financial institutions," the bench said.
Ambani and the firm were represented by senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Shyam Divan, who said the order would lead to the "civil death" of their clients.
Refusing to interfere with the February 23 order of the Bombay High Court's division bench, the SC said, "We see no ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court (division bench). It is clarified that the observations of the Division Bench shall have no bearing in the pending suit. The (single judge bench) High Court is requested to expedite the disposal of the suit (filed by Ambani against the show cause notices issued by banks on move to declare the accounts as fraud)."
The bench requested the single judge bench to expeditiously decide Ambani's plea against the show cause notices issued by three banks.
The apex court passed the order while hearing three separate pleas filed by Ambani who had challenged a February 23 order of a division bench of the high court.
The division bench had quashed a single judge bench interim order that stayed proceedings initiated against him and Reliance Communications Ltd to classify their bank accounts as fraud.
The division bench allowed the appeals filed by three public sector banks and auditor firm BDO India LLP against the December 2025 interim order passed by a single bench.
The single judge bench order had stayed all present and future action by Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI Bank, and Bank of Baroda, noting that the action was based on a legally flawed forensic audit and violated the Reserve Bank of India's mandatory guidelines.
Ambani challenged the show cause notices issued by Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI and Bank of Baroda before the single bench, seeking to declare his and Reliance Communications' accounts as fraudulent.
At the outset, Sibal said there was a question of law that must be decided. The bench said, "the matter pertains to siphoning of thousands of crores of public money," and any intervention at this stage would prejudice the ongoing investigation by probe agencies.
"Please go and raise all these issues before the high court … show cause notices have been issued. You have your own remedy against them...institutions have been duped crores of rupees," the CJI said, adding, "it's a case of siphoning off… We can't really express any opinion as we don't want to prejudice."
Sibal submitted that Ambani had conveyed his willingness to amicably resolve and settle all pending matters with the banks.
Earlier, the high court's division bench quashed the single bench order and termed it "illegal and perverse."
The banks had challenged a December 2025 single-bench order granting interim relief to Ambani and his company.
The order cited violations of mandatory RBI rules and a classic case of banks "waking up from deep slumber" after years.
The three banks in their appeal said the forensic audit, which led to accounts being classified as "fraud", was legally valid and based on serious findings of fund siphoning and misutilisation.
This was recorded in the report submitted by the audit firm BDO LLP, they contended.
The banks, in their plea, also said Ambani had raised a technical challenge to the forensic audit before the single bench.
Ambani, as an interim relief, sought a stay of the notices and an injunction against any coercive action on the ground that BDO LLP was not qualified to conduct the forensic audit as its signatory was not a chartered accountant.
BDO LLP is an accounting consultant firm and not an audit firm, Ambani claimed. The single bench agreed with Ambani and stayed the action by the banks.
