2nd Test: England 67/1 at stumps on Day 3, need 332 runs to win
Visakhapatnam, Feb 4: India's questionable batting approach left the door ajar for England's bazballers to go for a record yet achievable 399-run target in the second Test here Sunday, the hosts once again allowing their fearless opponents to come back into the game.
Like the series opener, India had the opportunity to bat the Englishmen out of the game after Shubman Gill's 104 off 147 balls but their inexplicable batting approach in the final session left the door open for the visitors.
India ended with 255 all out in their second innings.
On expected lines, England came out attacking through openers Zak Crawley (29 batting off 50) and Ben Duckett (28) before R Ashwin had the left-hander caught in his first over.
England ended at 67 for one at stumps with Crawley and night watchman Rehan Ahmed (9 batting) in the centre, still needing for 332 runs for a famous victory.
Though the odd ball is keeping low, there doesn't seem to be any demon in the pitch and England will be backing themselves to gun down the target and take a 2-0 series lead in the series.
The West Indies getting to 395 in Bangladesh two years ago remains the highest chase recorded in Asia.
India, who were 227 for six at tea and led England by 370 runs, could only manage 28 runs in 14.3 overs with their long tail not wagging again.
Rather than going for strokes, the likes of R Ashiwn (29 off 61) and Jasprit Bumrah (0 off 26 balls) were happy to bat time, not helping the team's cause eventually.
In the first innings, barring double centurion Yashasvi Jaiswal no batter crossed 40 and in the second innings, the highest individual score after Gill's hundred was 45 from Axar Patel.
While James Anderson (2/29) was relentless in his opening spell, the inexperienced spin trio of Shoaib Bashir (1/58), Rehan Ahmed (3/88) and Tom Hartley (4/77) bowled the bulk of the overs in the absence of Joe Root, who did not come out to field in the last two sessions after getting hit on his right little finger.
India's bizarre tactics came after Gill overcame a lean patch to score his third Test hundred before tea.
India made 97 runs in the afternoon session courtesy an 89-run stand between Gill and Axar.
Gill stole the show with his century but Axar also looked assured batting at number six.
Gill, who had completed his half century before lunch, continued to attack the spinners.
Leg-spinner Rehan Ahmed tried the round-the-wicket tactic but it did not work as Gill stepped out to smash him for a straight six before unleashing the sweep and on-drive for back-to-back fours in the same over.
The India number three got to three figures off Bashir in the 52nd over and his celebration was rather a muted one, as if he expected a lot more consistency out of himself. He had completed his first 50 plus score in 13 innings.
With Ben Stokes going for a short mid-on and short mid-wicket, Gill was trapped into playing a reverse sweep off Bashir. The ball deflected from Gill's gloves and keeper Ben Foakes pouched an easy catch.
Closer to tea, Axar also departed after a flat ball from Hartley kept a bit low and as per replays, was crashing into the stumps.
In the morning, Anderson struck twice before Gill rode his luck to complete a much-needed half-century to take India to 130 for four at lunch.
Gill survived two close DRS calls in successive overs soon after his arrival into the middle to post his first fifty plus score in 13 innings.
The first 30 minutes of the morning session belonged to Anderson, who continues to lord over batters at 41 years of age.
The veteran pacer first removed Rohit with an unplayable ball that seamed away a touch to knock the Indian skipper's off stump in his first over of the day before getting the in-form Jaiswal caught at first slip with a full ball in his following over.
The first innings double centurion went through with the loose drive and Joe Root did the rest at first slip. Gill and Iyer, both struggling for runs, found themselves in the middle and ended up sharing an 81-run stand off 112 balls.
The India number three was tentative at the start and Anderson's accuracy made him look more vulnerable. Gill first survived a close lbw call off Tom Hartley with the TV umpire overturning the on-field decision after spotting an inside edge that the batter himself was not sure about.
In the next over, an incoming ball from Anderson thudded into Gill's knee roll and on this occasion, the umpire's call saved Gill.
It seemed that was the stroke of luck that Gill desperately needed as he grew in confidence from thereon. He stepped out for a straight six off Shoaib Bashir to get going before using is feet against the other spinners.
Iyer too played a few strokes at the other end before a moment of sheer brilliance from Stokes sent him back to the dressing room.
Seeing mid-off up, Iyer took the aerial route against Hartley and Stokes showed great athleticism to run backwards to pluck that catch out of thin air.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Cong should take blame if allies feel INDIA bloc is disintegrating: Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut
Mumbai, Jan 10: Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut on Friday said it was the responsibility of the Congress to keep the INDIA bloc intact as it was the largest party in the opposition alliance.
Raut's statement came in the backdrop of Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah's remarks expressing dismay over the lack of clarity on INDIA bloc leadership and agenda, and saying the alliance should be wound up if it was meant only for the 2024 parliamentary elections.
"If the alliance partners feel the INDIA bloc was only for the Lok Sabha polls and doesn't exist now, the Congress is to be blamed (for this situation). There has been no communication, dialogue (among constituents). We fought the Lok Sabha elections (together) and got good results. There should have been a meeting (of INDIA) to chalk out future plans and it was the Congress' responsibility to take initiative in this regard," he asserted.
Lack of communication among partners in the anti-BJP grouping is giving an impression that all is not well in the bloc which has more than two dozen parties, emphasised the Rajya Sabha MP.
"There is no communication, dialogue, discussion (among allies). This means there is confusion in the minds of all whether every thing is fine within the alliance," he noted.
Raut warned that if the alliance, which took shape before the 2024 parliamentary polls, breaks, it cannot be revived.
"If the alliance was only for the Lok Sabha polls, then declare the INDIA bloc doesn't exist anymore. (In that case), all the allies are free to chose their own path," the Shiv Sena (UBT) leader maintained.
"The INDIA bloc was formed for the Lok Sabha polls. But the Congress should take responsibility to keep everyone together. We need to correct past mistakes. Dissolving the opposition grouping will be an extreme step," Raut cautioned.
Raut said even at the time of Maharashtra assembly polls in November last year, the Congress central leadership did not intervene when its state unit was driving hard bargaining during seat-sharing talks.
"There were several assembly seats where the NCP (SP) and the Shiv Sena (UBT) had good candidates, but the Congress did not give up claim on those seats. Instead of one-upmanship, we could have carefully concluded seat-sharing deal as a united MVA," he said.
The Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA), a state-level alliance of opposition parties, consists of the NCP (SP), the Shiv Sena (UBT) and the Congress. The MVA performed poorly in the November assembly polls winning just 46 seats in the 288-member House.
Raut emphasised that like the INDIA alliance at the national level, there was no coordination among the MVA constituents as well in Maharashtra.
The Rajya Sabha member clarified he does not agree with some Congress leaders calling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) convener Arvind Kejriwal "anti-national".
The Congress or the BJP will not win the February 5 assembly polls in Delhi. It will be the ruling AAP that will emerge victorious, he claimed.
The Congress and the AAP, both INDIA bloc members, are contesting the Delhi polls separately.
"It would have bee good if the AAP and the Congress were together it would have been good. We are in a dilemma ...both parties (Congress and AAP) needed to maintain balance. We have not yet finalized our stand on the Delhi polls," he said.
Maharashtra Congress leader Nitin Raut said MVA allies squabbled over CM post before polls and took a lot of time to finalize seat-sharing in the state for the November polls.
"We ignored organisational planning (after Lok Sabha polls) and preparation for (Maharashtra) assembly polls," he said.
Another Congress leader Vijay Wadettiwar agreed with Nitin Raut and wondered if there was a conspiracy to delay the seat-sharing talks among the MVA partners.
"We wasted 20 days and lost crucial time for campaigning. Nana Patole (state Congress chief) and Sanjay Raut were the main leaders (involved in seat-sharing). We were also there. Leaders didn't come on time for talks and time was wasted," he said.
NCP (SP) leader Jitendra Awhad agreed there was a lack of coordination in the MVA.
"Wadettiwar has retained his bungalow he got as the then Leader of Opposition (in last assembly). Call a meeting. I will come ..let's discuss within ourselves rather than speaking in the media," Awhad said.
Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut said Wadettiwar was very much part of the seat-sharing talks. "The Congress could have let go some seats where the allies had good candidates," Sanjay Raut said.
Talking to reporters in Jammu on Thursday, Omar Abdullah said the AAP, the Congress, and other political parties on the ground will decide how to effectively compete with the BJP.
"After the assembly elections in Delhi, they should call all the alliance members for a meeting. If this alliance (INDIA) was only for the parliamentary elections, it should be wound up, and we will work separately. But if it is meant for assembly elections as well, we will have to sit together and work collectively," the CM said.
The National Conference (NC) leader, whose party is a member of the national-level opposition grouping, was replying to a question about an RJD leader's statement that the INDIA bloc was meant only for Lok Sabha elections.
However, Omar Abdullah's father Farooq Abdullah, who heads the NC, took a different stand and asserted the INDIA bloc was a permanent political entity.
