Government response to earthquake has shortcomings, concedes Turkish president
Death count in Turkey-Syria crosses 15,000 as debris, weather hampers rescue work
Antakya: Turkish President Recep Tarrip Erdogan admitted on Wednesday to the government response to the disaster that has killed more than 15,000 people in Turkey and Syria having ‘shortcomings’.
Facing intense and growing criticism online to the way the Turkish government handled the situation after the 7.8-magnitude earthquake hit the region, Erdogan visited Kahramanmaras, which was not only one of the worst-hit spots but also the epicenter of the quake, reports NDTV.
The president acknowledged problems in the government response to the mishap. "Of course, there are shortcomings. The conditions are clear to see. It's not possible to be ready for a disaster like this," he said.
Rescuers have struggled to carry out the work amid not just the thousands of buildings that collapsed but also the freezing weather. The survivors, meanwhile, have been struggling to get food and shelter. They have also had to helplessly watch their relatives breathe their last after calling out for help from beneath the debris.
Expressing her pain, Semire Coban, a kindergarten teacher, in Turkey's Hatay, has said, "My nephew, my sister-in-law and her sister are in the ruins. There is no sign of life… We are trying to talk to them, but they are not responding... We are waiting for help. It has been 48 hours now.”
Officials and medical officers said that a total of 15,383 people had died – 12,391 in Turkey and at least 2,992 in Syria. Experts fear that the numbers will only rise sharply.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
K’taka HC judge whose controversial remarks triggered controversy expresses regret before open court
Bengaluru: Karnataka High Court judge, Justice V Srishananda, on Saturday expressed regret in open court after facing backlash over his controversial remarks in his recent court hearings, reported Bar and Bench.
Two purported video clips from Justice V Srishananda’s court hearing that show him making inappropriate comments went viral across social media platforms.
On Saturday, Justice Srishananda invited members of the Advocates Association, Bengaluru, and senior lawyers to his courtroom at 2:30 PM, where he read out a note expressing regret for inappropriate comments.
Quoting Advocates Association President Vivek Subba Reddy, Bar and Bench wrote, “He expressed regret for the comments and clarified that it was not his intention to offend any community or members of the Bar. He also requested the association to relay this message to all members of the Bar.”
Reddy further stated, “We also advised him to encourage young lawyers in the courtroom and refrain from making any irrelevant remarks during hearings.”
Another senior lawyer present during the session confirmed to the legal news portal that Justice Srishananda also addressed comments directed at a woman lawyer, who was seen in one of the videos being reprimanded by the judge. The judge Justice Srishananda clarified that his remarks were not intended to target her (woman lawyer) specifically, but rather pertained to the appellant she was representing. “He explained that his comment was meant to imply that the appellant seemed to know a lot about the other party,” said the lawyer.
In addition, Justice Srishananda assured those present that he would avoid making such comments in the future.
The controversy came to light on September 19, when a video clip from an August 28 Court hearing surfaced on social media, showing Justice Srishananda referring to a Muslim-majority sub-locality in Bengaluru’s Goripalya as "Pakistan." Hours later, another video from the same courtroom emerged, in which the judge was seen making a gender-insensitive remark.
Following outrage over the viral videos, a Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, Surya Kant, and Hrishikesh Roy, on September 20 took a suo motu cognizance and sought a report from the Karnataka High Court Registrar General in connection with the viral video.
