London: Award-winning British-American journalist Mehdi Hasan delivered a powerful and emotional speech at a packed Wembley Arena, where over 13,000 people had gathered for the ‘Together For Palestine’ fundraising concert. Hasan, the CEO and editor-in-chief of the media company Zeteo, used the platform to highlight what he described as the systematic silencing of Palestinian voices and the failure of Western journalism in covering the ongoing violence in Gaza.

Speaking to thunderous applause, Hasan said that for the last 23 months the world has been misled and manipulated, not only by Israel but also by the mainstream media in the West. He accused international outlets of failing in their duty to tell the full story of the “genocide in Gaza” and said it angered him when people demanded that Israel should allow more journalists into the besieged territory.

“Yes, Israel should. But Western media must stop acting as if there aren’t already journalists in Gaza,” Hasan said. “The bravest journalists in the world are in Gaza right now – Palestinian journalists.”

Hasan drew attention to the staggering number of journalists who have lost their lives in Gaza since the escalation of violence. He said 270 Palestinian journalists had been killed, a figure that, according to him, exceeded the number of journalists killed in World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War and the Iraq War combined.

“These journalists were not killed by accident, they were not collateral damage,” Hasan declared. “They were killed as part of Israel’s deliberate campaign to blind the world and erase evidence of its crimes.”

He went on to name several slain journalists, including Anas al-Sharif, Hossam Shabbat, Maryam Abu Dhaka, Roshdi Siraj, Muhammad Abu Hattab – who died along with 11 members of his family – and Bilal Jadallah. Hundreds of others, Hasan said, would never be remembered on platforms like CNN or the BBC.

Strongly criticising the silence of his peers, Hasan said, “Shame on those Western journalists who have not uttered a single word about the mass killing of their Palestinian counterparts.” He added that Palestinian journalists were “the best of us” because they were not only documenting a war but also their own annihilation and starvation in real time.

In one of the most striking moments of his speech, Hasan led the Wembley crowd in chanting: “You can’t bomb the truth away.” The audience repeated the slogan several times, filling the arena with a defiant chorus.

Hasan urged people worldwide to carry forward the work of the fallen journalists, not with fear or silence, but with courage, loud voices, and resistance. “Every fallen journalist leaves behind their footage, their words, their example. Let us honour their sacrifice not with despair, but with defiance,” he said.

Ending his speech on a note of solidarity and hope, Hasan addressed the journalists who died in Gaza: “Your voices are our voices. Your struggle is our struggle. And your truth will not die.”

He also sent a strong message to Israel, its allies, and sections of the media: “You will not silence Gaza. You will not silence Palestine. You will not silence the truth. And one day soon, Palestine will be free.”

The speech was met with a standing ovation, with many in the audience visibly moved by Hasan’s words. The Wembley gathering was one of the largest solidarity events for Palestine in recent times, combining fundraising with calls for justice and international accountability.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi (PTI): Aam Aadmi Party chief Arvind Kejriwal has written to Delhi High Court Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, saying he will not appear in the excise case personally or through a lawyer before her, the party said on Monday.

Pointing to a "grave miscarriage of justice", Kejriwal, in a four-page letter, said he has "serious and unreconciled" concerns regarding the matter.

"I have decided that I shall not participate in the further proceedings in this matter, either in person or through counsel. I do not take this step lightly," Kejriwal added.

In his letter, Kejriwal further said that "justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done".

"The principle that justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done, is among the most sacred assurances that a court gives to a citizen in a democracy," he said.

The assurance cannot be dishonoured by asking the citizen to ignore what "anyone can plainly see" in a case like this, he added in the letter.

The letter also invoked the principles of Satyagraha and the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi, with Kejriwal saying that his intent is "strengthening of judiciary and prevent its weakening".

He added that he has given the authority an opportunity to consider and correct what he perceived to be a grave miscarriage of justice.

His earlier plea seeking the recusal of Justice Sharma, which was rejected on April 20, was interpreted as a personal attack, the AAP chief claimed.

"After the said judgment, I am left with the painful and inescapable impression that what I had urged as a lawful plea of apprehension was received and answered as a personal attack upon Your Ladyship and as an assault on the institution itself.

"Those are not, with respect, answers to the case I had brought. They show me that my plea of apprehension has been judicially understood as a personal and institutional affront," he said in the letter.

The letter further noted the leader's belief that it was now "impossible to receive an impartial hearing" in Justice Sharma's court.

Kejriwal also reiterated two grounds cited earlier in his recusal plea.

"First, the issue of Your Ladyship's repeated public association with the RSS's legal front, the Akhil Bharatiya Adhivakta Parishad (ABAP) -- an organisation belonging to the ideological ecosystem of the ruling dispensation," he wrote, further pointing out that Justice Sharma's children "are professionally engaged on multiple advocates' panels of the Union government which happens to be the opposite party in this case".

Reflecting on his personal experience during the proceedings, the former Delhi chief minister expressed concern over the broader implications of his case on public trust in the judiciary, while he said he maintains respect for the institution.

ALSO READ:  ED raids in case against former Punjab Police DIG Bhullar, linked entities

"When I appeared before Your Ladyship to argue my case, the question in my heart was simple: Will I get justice? Today, with the deepest respect, I must say that the same question has become graver and deeper in my conscience," he said.

This case has now become a matter of widespread public discussion. It is being discussed not merely in legal and political circles, but in homes across the country, the letter read.

Addressing potential criticism, Kejriwal clarified that his remarks should not be interpreted as opposition to the judiciary.

"As I write this, I am also cognisant of the fact that some might portray me as someone 'against' the judiciary. But how can that ever be the case when I have personally received relief from the judiciary, including orders of bail and the present discharge?

"Today, I walk free because of the judiciary. Let there exist no figment of imagination that my present stand is against the institution," he asserted.

Kejriwal further said his respect for the judiciary "remains intact" and he has "unwavering faith" in the Constitution of India.

"My objection is not to the institution of the High Court or the larger judicial system, but only to the continuance of this matter before Your Ladyship (Sharma) under a cloud of grave and unresolved questions and circumstances that have generated grave public doubt in your ability to dispense impartial justice," Kejriwal further wrote in the letter.

He also clarified that his "personal inability" is confined to just this matter.

"I shall continue to appear in matters where these serious and unreconciled concerns do not arise, including matters in which the solicitor general does not appear and matters unconnected with the Union government, the BJP or the RSS," the letter added.

He further said he has made the decision by listening to the voice of his conscience and that he is prepared to bear the consequences.

"I may prejudice my own legal interests. I understand that I may lose the opportunity to advance submissions before this Hon'ble Court and that adverse consequences in law may follow. I am prepared to bear those consequences," the AAP chief said.

He added that he will reserve the right to approach the Supreme Court to appeal against Justice Sharma's decision.