London, May 21: The UK has been accused of turning a "blind eye" to Russia's "dirty money", putting national security at risk. A British parliamentarian body said London is being used to hide Russian President Vladimir Putin's illegal assets, media reports said.

The Commons Foreign Affairs Committee said it was "business as usual" for the UK despite the poisoning of Russian ex-spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter as the UK was being used to stash "corrupt assets" of Putin and his allies, the BBC reported.

A report, named Moscow's Gold: Russian Corruption in the UK, points out that Russian gas giant Gazprom was able to trade bonds in London "days after the attempted murders" of Skripal and his daughter.

This undermined the UK's efforts to confront the full spectrum of Putin's offensive measures, it added.

Business between the UK and Russia had resumed so swiftly following the incident that it had prompted the Russian embassy in London to tweet: "Business as usual?"

Committee Chairman and Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat wrote in the Sunday Times, ahead of the publication of the report that the UK's "lethargic response is being taken as proof that we do not dare stop them... London's markets are enabling the Kremlin's efforts". 

Security and Economic Crime Minister Ben Wallace said he had not been called to give evidence to the Committee: "I fear such an omission weakens the foundation of the report," he said.

Wallace said the UK was "determined to drive dirty money and the money launderers out".

"(We) will use all the powers we have, including the new powers in the Criminal Finance Act, to clamp down on those that threaten our security," he added. 

Tungendhat said ministers should investigate "gaps" in the sanctions regime which allows the Russian government and individuals linked to Putin to continue to raise funds in the city.

"The scale of damage that this 'dirty money' can do to the UK foreign policy interests dwarfs the benefit of Russian transactions in the city.

"The UK must be clear that the corruption stemming from the Kremlin is no longer welcome in our markets and we will act," the BBC quoted Tugendhat as saying.

The committee's report urges the government to show "stronger political leadership" on the issue by taking a number of actions, including: further sanctions against "Kremlin-connected individuals"; closing loopholes in the existing sanctions regime and speeding up plans to disclose transparent corporate ownership."

 

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Lucknow (PTI): Samajwadi Party supremo Akhilesh Yadav on Thursday raised questions over maintenance of the Taj Mahal in Agra and attacked the Yogi Adityanath government saying it should be a "living and active" example, not just a "monument".

Yadav, who shared a viral video in which a plant could be seen sprouting from the dome of the Taj Mahal, said the monument might develop cracks due to the roots.

In a post on X, he said, "The BJP government and its dormant departments have completely failed to maintain the Taj Mahal, the wonder that attracts tourists from all over the world."

Yadav went on to say, "There is a possibility of rusting of the metal of the urn on the main dome. Water is dripping from the main dome. There is news of plants growing in the dome. If the roots of trees like these grow, then the Taj Mahal may crack."

He also highlighted problems of monkey menace and water logging in the Taj Mahal complex.

"The Taj Mahal complex has become a sanctuary for monkeys. There is a problem of waterlogging in the Taj Mahal complex. The tourists are worried whether they should admire the Taj Mahal or deal with the problems," Yadav said, adding due to all these reasons, the country's image is tarnished at the global level. ⁠

Last week, the main dome of the Taj witnessed water seepage due to incessant rains but officials said there was no damage to the arched roof.

Yadav asked where crores of rupees of funds that come for the maintenance of Taj Mahal are going.

"The government should be a living and active example, not just a monument," he added.