It's a NO to anonymous cryptocurrency accounts in South Korea
Seoul: The South Korean government on Thursday took measures to ban the use of anonymous virtual accounts in cryptocurrency transactions following a ministerial meeting.
The measures, currently in effect, stipulate deposits and withdrawals be allowed only in digital accounts that can be verified with the bank account with a person's name, and also ban the issuing of new virtual accounts not linked to a bank account, reports Efe news.
Hong Nam-ki, minister of the Office for Government Policy Coordination, said the government "can't let this abnormal situation of speculation go on any longer".
The decision goes against one of the main characteristics of cryptocurrencies: the blockchain, a technology that allows the encryption and recording of transactions between two parties in a verifiable, permanent and anonymous manner without intermediaries.
South Korea is taking the steps taken by Japan and other countries, where cryptocurrency exchanges require users to furnish official documents for registration as per government regulations.
South Korea's Financial Intelligence Unit and Financial Supervisory Service will make joint inspections of virtual cryptocurrency exchanges to ensure that transactions are carried out under a real name.
In South Korea and Japan, cryptocurrencies have become a popular form of payment, an investment asset and are even used as a pension fund due to relatively small returns from other investments.
Hong said that speculation in cryptocurrencies was rife in South Korea, where the value of many virtual currencies has become higher than abroad and as the Central Bank does not offer guarantee on the currencies, they are susceptible to fluctuations and big crashes.
The South Korean ministry of justice had proposed suspending cryptocurrency exchanges, but the final measures are aimed at stopping the anonymous use, preventing money laundering and reducing advertisements about cryptocurrencies
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Allahabad HC orders probe into 'reinstatement' of teacher in UP's Barabanki
Lucknow (PTI): The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court on Friday ordered a probe by the special task force (STF) into alleged irregularities in the rejoining of a teacher at City Intermediate College in Barabanki, observing that the reinstatement appeared to be prima facie illegal.
The court also directed the recovery of the salary paid to the teacher during the disputed period.
A bench of Justice Rajeev Singh passed the order on a petition filed by the college management committee. The court expressed doubts over the roles of the District Inspector of Schools (DIOS), Barabanki, the college principal and the teacher concerned and hence, directed a detailed inquiry into the matter.
Taking note of alleged manipulation of records and misleading submissions, the court ordered the immediate transfer of the Barabanki DIOS to ensure a fair probe. It also directed the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against the then joint director of education of the Ayodhya division.
In its order, the court found that the teacher, Abhay Kumar, was initially appointed as an assistant teacher in 2018 but joined an Eklavya Model Residential School in Chhattisgarh as a lecturer in June 2024 without obtaining permission from the management. His subsequent request to retain the lien was rejected.
Despite this, he was allowed to rejoin the Barabanki College in September 2025 on the directions of the joint director of education and the DIOS, and was even paid the salary for October 2025. The court termed the rejoining "wholly illegal" and lacking any legal basis.
The bench also expressed concern over lapses in communication within the education department and directed the Uttar Pradesh chief secretary to ensure that official orders are communicated through email and WhatsApp as well, to prevent disputes.
The matter is next listed for hearing on May 28 when a compliance report is sought.
