Mamata tears into BJP, EC over SIR; warns of Modi govt’s fall if one eligible voter struck off rolls
Kolkata (PTI): Mounting a blistering attack on the BJP and the EC, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Tuesday accused them of turning the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists into a political tool for a "silent, invisible rigging" ahead of the 2026 Assembly polls.
She warned that the fall of the Narendra Modi government would be "inevitable" if even a single eligible voter was deleted from West Bengal's rolls during the SIR conducted by the Election Commission (EC) in the state.
Leading a massive anti-SIR rally through the heart of Kolkata, from Dharmatala to Jorasanko - the ancestral home of Rabindranath Tagore, the CM, accompanied by her nephew and TMC national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee, alleged that the BJP and the EC were "colluding to erase voters from opposition-ruled states" while sparing the ones governed by the saffron party.
"The BJP is conducting SIR in states like Kerala, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal, but not in BJP-ruled Assam, Tripura or other northeastern states," she thundered before a charged crowd.
The assembly polls are due in Kerala, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal Assam next year.
ALSO READ: SIR of electoral rolls begins in 12 states, UTs; TMC calls exercise a 'con job'
"Why is this bias? This is clear discrimination, aimed at helping the ruling party at the Centre," she said.
The Trinamool Congress supremo warned, "If even one genuine voter's name is struck off the rolls, the BJP government will be shaken to its core. The fall of this government will be inevitable."
Accusing the Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, whom she mockingly called "kursi babu", of acting under political pressure, Banerjee said, "In 2002, Bengal's last SIR took two years to complete. Why the hurry to finish this one in a month? Just to make Modi Babu and Amit Shah happy?"
Questioning the BJP's claim of illegal voters in Bengal, she said, "They say they will expel Bangladeshis and Rohingyas. How many Rohingyas did they find in Bihar after SIR? Just speaking Bengali doesn't make someone a Bangladeshi. Speaking Urdu doesn't make someone a Pakistani. Bengal's identity cannot be insulted like this."
The TMC chief accused Union Home Minister Amit Shah of hypocrisy.
"He criticises our so-called dynastic politics, yet he has appointed his own son to the highest post," she alleged, without naming him.
Taking on the Election Commission, the chief minister asked if the names of someone's parents are not on the list, would they have to prove again that they were born in this state?
"The Commission is creating multiple confusions in the rolls. Who will take responsibility for these mistakes? Wouldn't it have been better to conduct this exercise after the elections? Do we have to prove our citizenship even after so many years of birth and independence?" she said.
ALSO READ: ECI team to visit Bengal to review SIR procedures: Official
She said that the TMC would continue the fight against the issue both on the streets and in courts.
"We will extend our support if they conduct the SIR after the Assembly polls. But how can you do it just months before the elections? This is nothing but a politically motivated move to intimidate voters," she said.
Banerjee also alleged that names of many voters were already being removed in the name of "mapping" and that several people had died from panic caused by the SIR process.
"The BJP is behind this chaos. People are dying because of the fear they are spreading," she charged.
Drawing parallels with the Centre's controversial policies, she recalled, "I had opposed demonetisation. They still went ahead with it. What did people gain? Nothing but hardship and humiliation. And yet they never apologised. What a shameless government!"
Slamming the BJP for its alleged obsession with controlling institutions, she said, "They may win in deals, they may win through manipulation; but they will never win the people's mandate. They have big babus, small babus, and middle babus. I respect the chair, but there's a limit to how much you can bow down."
They have crossed all limits of oppression, the CM alleged.
Taking a dig at the ruling party's alleged hypocrisy over citizenship documents, Banerjee remarked, "You made people pay to get Aadhaar cards, and now you say Aadhaar isn't proof of citizenship! What nonsense is this?"
The CM also alleged that BJP workers, posing as bank employees, were collecting personal data of people in parts of Diamond Harbour, the Lok Sabha constituency of Abhishek Banerjee, and warned citizens against sharing information with unauthorised officials.
"Give information only to official BLOs. Suppose you are not at home, will your name then be removed? That's why we have set up a TMC helpdesk to assist people," she said.
In an emotional pitch to the crowd, Banerjee asked, "After serving seven times as an MP, three terms as the chief minister, and four terms as a central minister, do I still need to prove I'm not a Bangladeshi?"
She accused the BJP of hatching a conspiracy to strike off "nearly two crore voters" from West Bengal's rolls.
The CM said, "People (of West Bengal) are being branded as Bangladeshis just because they work in other states. These illiterates know nothing about our history of independence. Once, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh had been one. After independence, people went wherever life took them."
Reiterating that the state would not bow down before powers in New Delhi, Banerjee said, "This is not just about Bengal. This is about the soul of India, the right to vote, the right to belong. We will fight this both in Bengal and, if needed, in Delhi."
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Deep societal faultlines persist despite 75 years of independence: Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
Judge cites denial of home to Muslim girl, opposition to Dalit women cooking mid-day meals
Hyderabad, February 23, 2026: Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has said that despite repeated affirmations of constitutional morality by courts, deep societal faultlines rooted in caste and religious discrimination continue to shape everyday realities in India.
Speaking at a seminar on “Constitutional Morality and the Role of District Judiciary” organised by the Telangana Judges Association and the Telangana State Judicial Academy in Hyderabad, Justice Bhuyan reflected on the gap between constitutional ideals and social practices.
He cited a recent instance involving his daughter’s friend, a PhD scholar at a private university in Noida, who was denied accommodation in South Delhi after her surname revealed her Muslim identity. According to Justice Bhuyan, the landlady bluntly informed her that no accommodation was available once her religious background became known.
In another example from Odisha, he referred to resistance by some parents to the government’s mid-day meal programme because the food was prepared by Dalit women employed as cooks. He noted that some parents had objected aggressively and refused to allow their children to consume meals cooked by members of the Scheduled Caste community.
Describing these incidents as “the tip of the iceberg,” Justice Bhuyan said they reveal how far society remains from the benchmark of constitutional morality even 75 years into the Republic. He observed that while the Constitution lays down standards of equality and dignity, the morality practised within homes and communities often diverges sharply from those values.
He emphasised that constitutional morality requires governance through the rule of law rather than the rule of popular opinion. Referring to the evolution of the doctrine through judicial decisions, he cited Naz Foundation v Union of India, in which the Delhi High Court read down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, holding that popular morality cannot restrict fundamental rights under Article 21. Though the judgment was later overturned in Suresh Kumar Koushal v Naz Foundation, the Supreme Court ultimately restored and expanded the principle in Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, affirming that constitutional morality must prevail over majoritarian views.
“In our constitutional scheme, it is the constitutionality of the issue before the court that is relevant, not the dominant or popular view,” he said.
Justice Bhuyan also addressed the functioning of the district judiciary, underlining that trial courts are the first point of contact for most litigants and form the foundation of the justice delivery system. He stressed that due importance must be given to the recording of evidence and adjudication of bail matters.
Highlighting the role of High Courts, he said their supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution is intended as a shield to correct grave jurisdictional errors, not as a mechanism to substitute the discretion or factual appreciation of trial judges.
He recalled that several distinguished judges, including Justice H R Khanna, Justice A M Ahmadi, and Justice Fathima Beevi, began their careers in the district judiciary.
On representation within the judicial system, Justice Bhuyan noted that Telangana has made significant strides in gender inclusion. Out of a sanctioned strength of 655 judicial officers in the Telangana Judicial Service, 478 are currently serving, of whom 283 are women, exceeding 50 per cent representation. He added that members of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, minority communities, and persons with disabilities are also represented in the state’s judiciary.
He observed that greater representation of women, marginalised communities, persons with disabilities, and sexual minorities would help make the judiciary more inclusive and reflective of India’s diversity. “The judiciary must represent all the colours of the rainbow and become a rainbow institution,” he said.
Justice Bhuyan also referred to the recent restoration by the Supreme Court of the requirement of a minimum three years of practice at the Bar for entry-level judicial posts. While acknowledging that the requirement ensures practical exposure, he cautioned that its impact on women aspirants, especially those from rural or small-town backgrounds facing social and financial constraints, would need to be carefully observed over time.
Concluding his address, he reiterated that the justice system must strive to bridge the gap between constitutional ideals and lived realities, ensuring that the rule of law remains paramount.
