BJP, JD(S) trying to destabilise govt: Cong over opposition's graft charges against CM Siddaramaiah
Bengaluru, Aug 4: The Congress would unitedly fight against the BJP and JD(S)'s attempts to destabilise the Siddaramaiah government, the ruling party in Karnataka said on Sunday, backing its chief minister who is on the opposition's radar in MUDA and state-run Valmiki Corporation "scams".
"Everybody knows about Siddaramaiah's honesty. He is not a new chief minister here. Everybody knows about his career, where he started, where he is now, also his ideology and his background," Congress General Secretary in-charge of Organisation K C Venugopal told reporters here.
His comments came after he held a meeting with state ministers along with Congress General Secretary in-charge of the state Randeep Singh Surjewala, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and his deputy D K Shivakumar.
Shivakumar is also the party's Karanataka unit chief.
The meeting comes in the wake of Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot issuing a show cause notice to Siddaramaiah, which is seen as a precursor to giving sanction to his prosecution in the alleged Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) site allotment "scam".
ALSO READ: BJP-JD(S) protest march is for 'redemption from their sins': Deputy CM DK Shivakumar
The notice was issued on July 26 based on a plea filed by advocate-activist T J Abraham. The chief minister was directed to submit his reply within seven days.
Venugopal claimed the BJP and JD(S) are targeting the Congress dispensation and the chief minister as they are aware that the state government's guarantee schemes to address the concerns of the poor people will harm them politically.
"So they conspired and brought out some charges against Siddaramaiah and the Congress dispensation, thereby trying to destabilise the government. Unfortunately, the governor has become a tool in the BJP's conspiracy," he added.
The opposition BJP and JD(S) began a week-long 'Mysuru Chalo' foot march on Saturday against the alleged fraudulent allotment of sites by MUDA to those who lost land to other development projects, including Siddaramaiah's wife Parvathi. The two parties are demanding the chief minister's resignation.
The Karnataka government on Thursday "strongly advised" Gehlot to withdraw the show-cause notice and alleged "gross misuse of the constitutional office" of the governor.
The council of ministers held a meeting on Thursday and later alleged that a concerted effort was being made to destabilise a lawfully elected majority government in Karnataka for political gains.
Venugopal on Sunday said the ministers have been told to visit districts and assembly constituencies and explain to the people how the BJP was trying to "destabilise" the government and end the guarantee schemes.
"We are very much concerned about the poor people of the state. We will continue with the guarantee schemes. We are really proud of the government's implementation of guarantees. This is what we have discussed and decided today," he added.
The opposition parties have been demanding Siddaramaiah's resignation also over the Valmiki Corporation "scam" that came to light after its accounts superintendent Chandrashekhar P ended his life on May 26.
Chandrashekhar left a note claiming that Rs 187 crore was transferred from the corporation's bank account, of which Rs 88.62 crore was "illegally" moved to accounts of "well-known" IT companies and a Hyderabad-based cooperative bank, among others.
According to Congress sources, Venugopal asked the ministers at the meeting why the Congress government has not been able to effectively counter the BJP and JD(S)' narrative, despite the opposition "lacking" any clear evidence.
Venugopal and Surjewala are said to have asked the ministers to strongly stand behind the CM and defend him, while also effectively countering the opposition.
Indicating the possible scenario where the government may have to legally fight the governor if prosecution against the chief minister is sanctioned in connection with the MUDA "scam", they assured the high command's support, the sources added.
Noting the BJP's "history in sabotaging governments", Venugopal alleged the last JD(S)-Congress coalition dispensation was "dislodged" by a conspiracy hatched by the BJP's central leadership.
"They are trying and targeting the current Karnataka government the same way with a clear motive," the Congress leader said.
He alleged that when former JD(S) MP Prajwal Revanna's sexual abuse cases came to the fore, at that point itself there was a conspiracy against the Congress government. "The BJP and JD(S) want to save their leaders' children which is why they are targeting our elected government."
Venugopal said the BJP talking about corruption is the "biggest joke".
"How many cases (BJP state president) B Y Vijayendra has against him? How many cases are there against Prajwal Revanna? Now they are trying to project them as the most decent people in the country and attacking the chief minister who has built his career by being amidst the common people of the state," he said.
"We know their intention. They want to finish a person who is standing for the poor people of Karnataka... By creating a perception that Siddaramaiah is corrupt, their intention is to target him and our guarantee schemes," he said.
At the meeting with the state ministers, Venugopal and Surjewala asked them to focus on performance, amid indications about the possibility of a cabinet reshuffle in the next couple of months, sources said.
Responding to a question, Venugopal said today's discussion was not about the performance of the ministers.
About the Union budget, he said, "Union Finance Minister (Nirmala Sitharaman) was elected (to Rajya Sabha) from Karnataka. Total discrimination. No BJP member is raising it in Parliament. It is a very sorry state of affairs."
Instead of coming forward to support the state, the BJP is trying to destabilise the government, he alleged. "But times have changed. The Central government is not as strong as earlier. Those trying such things (destabilising) have to think about it."
"The Congress is very confident. We will fight it legally, and such destabilising attempts will be explained to the people of the state with great vigour," Venugopal added.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Single higher education regulator bill tabled in LS; Oppn flags ‘centralisation,' JPC likely
New Delhi: A bill to set up a 13-member body to regulate institutions of higher education was introduced in the Lok Sabha on Monday.
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan introduced the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, which seeks to establish an overarching higher education commission along with three councils for regulation, accreditation, and ensuring academic standards for universities and higher education institutions in India.
Meanwhile, the move drew strong opposition, with members warning that it could weaken institutional autonomy and result in excessive centralisation of higher education in India.
The Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, 2025, earlier known as the Higher Education Council of India (HECI) Bill, has been introduced in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
The proposed legislation seeks to merge three existing regulatory bodies, the University Grants Commission (UGC), the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), and the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), into a single unified body called the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan.
At present, the UGC regulates non-technical higher education institutions, the AICTE oversees technical education, and the NCTE governs teacher education in India.
Under the proposed framework, the new commission will function through three separate councils responsible for regulation, accreditation, and the maintenance of academic standards across universities and higher education institutions in the country.
According to the Bill, the present challenges faced by higher educational institutions due to the multiplicity of regulators having non-harmonised regulatory approval protocols will be done away with.
The higher education commission, which will be headed by a chairperson appointed by the President of India, will cover all central universities and colleges under it, institutes of national importance functioning under the administrative purview of the Ministry of Education, including IITs, NITs, IISc, IISERs, IIMs, and IIITs.
At present, IITs and IIMs are not regulated by the University Grants Commission (UGC).
Government to refer bill to JPC; Oppn slams it
The government has expressed its willingness to refer it to a joint committee after several members of the Lok Sabha expressed strong opposition to the Bill, stating that they were not given time to study its provisions.
Responding to the opposition, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the government intends to refer the Bill to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for detailed examination.
Congress Lok Sabha MP Manish Tewari warned that the Bill could result in “excessive centralisation” of higher education. He argued that the proposed law violates the constitutional division of legislative powers between the Union and the states.
According to him, the Bill goes beyond setting academic standards and intrudes into areas such as administration, affiliation, and the establishment and closure of university campuses. These matters, he said, fall under Entry 25 of the Concurrent List and Entry 32 of the State List, which cover the incorporation and regulation of state universities.
Tewari further stated that the Bill suffers from “excessive delegation of legislative power” to the proposed commission. He pointed out that crucial aspects such as accreditation frameworks, degree-granting powers, penalties, institutional autonomy, and even the supersession of institutions are left to be decided through rules, regulations, and executive directions. He argued that this amounts to a violation of established constitutional principles governing delegated legislation.
Under the Bill, the regulatory council will have the power to impose heavy penalties on higher education institutions for violating provisions of the Act or related rules. Penalties range from ₹10 lakh to ₹75 lakh for repeated violations, while establishing an institution without approval from the commission or the state government could attract a fine of up to ₹2 crore.
Concerns were also raised by members from southern states over the Hindi nomenclature of the Bill. N.K. Premachandran, an MP from the Revolutionary Socialist Party representing Kollam in Kerala, said even the name of the Bill was difficult to pronounce.
He pointed out that under Article 348 of the Constitution, the text of any Bill introduced in Parliament must be in English unless Parliament decides otherwise.
DMK MP T.M. Selvaganapathy also criticised the government for naming laws and schemes only in Hindi. He said the Constitution clearly mandates that the nomenclature of a Bill should be in English so that citizens across the country can understand its intent.
Congress MP S. Jothimani from Tamil Nadu’s Karur constituency described the Bill as another attempt to impose Hindi and termed it “an attack on federalism.”
_vb_22.jpeg)
