New Delhi: A Twitter campaign by the right-wing users of the micro-blogging site termed the supporters of Umar Khalid as terrorists. The campaign had, at the time of posting this report, had recorded nearly 60,000 tweets.
The campaign comes a day after former JNU student leader Umar Khalid was arrested by Delhi Police under the stringent UAPA law for allegedly conspiring the North-East Delhi Riots that broke out in February this year.
Several leaders, activists, and people from across fraternities had called on Delhi Police after Umar’s arrest adding that the police were involved in witch-hunting instead of arresting those who actually triggered and promoted violence that resulted in the Delhi Riots.
As a counter move by the right-wing users took to Twitter and termed Umar Khalid as a terrorist before going on to add that those who support him were also terrorists.
The police, on the other hand, presented Umar before Additional Sessions Judge and sought 10-day custody adding that they want to confront him with a huge amount of data.
Umar, ever since his arrest on Sunday night has been receiving support from all quarters and #StandWithUmarKhalid was among the top-trending hashtags on Twitter India with over 2.5 lakh tweets during the time of posting of this report.
ALSO READ: "This is puppet Delhi Police for you", Dhruv Rathee reacts to Umar Khalid's arrest
ALSO READ: Actor Prakash Raj asks people to raise voice against "Witch-hunt" in wake of Umar Khalid's arrest
ALSO READ: Umar Khalid is the leader India deserves, his arrest under UAPA is shocking: Yogendra Yadav
Here are some of the tweets from Monday’s campaign wherein the right-wing users termed those supporting Umar Khalid as terrorists:
NOTE: The claims made in the tweets embedded below or the ideas presented in them are those solely of the users. Vartha Bharati does not guarantee the authenticity of any of the claims or does not necessarily endorse, support the ideas, views posted by any of the users.
As soon as a terrorist is arrested, all the traitors gather and come on the road.
— yogi devnath (@YogiDevnath2) September 14, 2020
#उमरखालिद_समर्थक_आतंकी_हैं
Who Is #UmarKhalid ?
— Sanjeev Paswan (@ChiragAryan7) September 14, 2020
- Khalid’s father Syed Qasim Ilyas was a one of the founder member of an organization named SIMI (Student Islamic Movement of India)which was banned due to its separatist and radical activities in 2001
#उमरखालिद_समर्थक_आतंकी_हैं #उमरखालिद_समर्थक_आतंकी_हैं pic.twitter.com/Ukxm08DNMC
Make this as ur profile pic #उमरखालिद_समर्थक_आतंकी_हैं pic.twitter.com/NLnVKisR5s
— Rupesh Tiwari (@rupootiwari) September 14, 2020
#उमरखालिद_समर्थक_आतंकी_हैं
— Abhishek (@Abhishe37751502) September 14, 2020
Sarey Tukde Tukde gang wale jail m hone chahiye. They have audacity to shout anti-national slogans after getting everything almost free in JNU. We accept difference of opinion but not these NAUGHTY ? pic.twitter.com/FfprGPnUr3
Arrest @ReallySwara @GAUAHAR_KHAN @anuragkashyap72. They supported these Anti nationals and they all are equally responsible for the riots and damages done.@AmitShah @narendramodi @rajnathsingh Nation wants them arrested,if not bring them in public #उमरखालिद_समर्थक_आतंकी_हैं
— Kangna Ranaut?️ (@Kangnateam56) September 14, 2020
#उमरखालिद_समर्थक_आतंकी_हैं
— Verma Jony (@VermaJony3) September 14, 2020
Apt for them who are in support of people like these.....#UmarKhalid #Umarkhalidterrorist #उमरखालिद_समर्थक_आतंकी_हैं pic.twitter.com/Kh7yoEiUB8
Arrest @ReallySwara @deepikapadukone @anuragkashyap72. They supported these Anti nationals and they all are equally responsible for the riots and damages done.@AmitShah @narendramodi @rajnathsingh Nation wants them arrested,if not bring them in public #उमरखालिद_समर्थक_आतंकी_हैं pic.twitter.com/0YTjb2ODma
— Saurav Singh (@Sauravsingh189) September 14, 2020
One by one, all the Anti Nationalists will now come out of their bunkers to safeguard a Terrorist.
— Abhinav Mantri Pronamo (@AbhinavMantri5) September 14, 2020
?️#उमरखालिद_समर्थक_आतंकी_हैं@ProNaMoSeva @AshishJaggi_1 @Sagar4BJP @sambitswaraj @GayathriBandar7 @priyathedentico pic.twitter.com/NlqQs9HtAa
#उमरखालिद_समर्थक_आतंकी_हैं
— Rutu (@rutum44) September 14, 2020
Do you agree
They all Belongs To the same group .
Tukde Tukde Gang
Tagging Some @UmarKhalidJNU @kanhaiyakumar @ReallySwara @kunalkamra88 @anuragkashyap72 @jigneshmevani80
Roses are red
Violates are blue
Khalid is in jail #Swara next is you. pic.twitter.com/RM8UPtcquj
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Bengaluru, Mar 6 (PTI): The Karnataka Assembly on Thursday passed the Bangalore Palace (Utilisation and Regulation of Land) Bill, reaffirming state ownership over 472 acres and 16 guntas of land here, amid protests by the opposition BJP.
During the discussion, Karnataka Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister H K Patil said the state government would have to provide Rs 200 crore worth of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) for each acre of land, which means that for 15 acres, Rs 3,000 crore worth of TDR would be issued.
“If we accept it, then this 2-km stretch of road will become the costliest road in the world. If we accept it then how are we going to develop the city in later stages? How will you carry out development works?” asked Patil.
He also pointed out that this question was raised not only under the Congress government but also during the previous BJP regime.
However, the BJP-led cabinet has opposed the project.
ALSO READ: Budget session: Law Min. HK Patil introduces Microfinance bill in Karnataka assembly
“Suppose we agree to it then, what will be the valuation of the 472 acres? It will be lakhs and lakhs of crores of rupees. Can we accept?” Patil wondered.
The Minister said the government had previously exercised its executive powers to issue an ordinance, which was approved by the Governor. Now the government is bringing a bill with two amendments.
“In this bill, we have made provisions either to develop or drop the road development work,” Patil explained.
However, BJP state president B Y Vijayendra and BJP MLA Arvind Bellad opposed the move, alleging that the government was targetting Yaduveer Krishna Datta Chamaraja Wadiyar, the scion of the Mysuru royal family, and the BJP MP from Mysuru-Kodagu constituency out of political vendetta.
“We talk of 472 acres of Mysuru Maharaja but here there are many Maharajas who too own 400 acres, 500 acres and thousands of acres of land, which is known to everyone,” Bellad said.
He slammed the Congress government, saying political power should not be misused for personal vendetta.
“Why (the then Deputy Chief Minister) Siddaramaiah brought the law in 1996 pertaining to the Bangalore Palace? Why are you setting eyes on the Bangalore Palace?” he asked.
Vijayendra charged that Wadiyar won the election on BJP ticket so the state government realised that it should acquire it.
“This bill has been brought for political vengeance. We are not discussing whether Rs 3,000 crore is exorbitant or not but the moment Yaduveer became MP, the state government woke up. You should be ashamed. This house should not be used for political vendetta,” he said.
Intervening, Minister Priyank Kharge said Vijayendra should not have raised it because the intention behind building the road was noble.
According to him, the BJP too had the same plan when it was in power.
He sought to know whether thousands of crores of rupees be spent on a road which should have cost significantly less.
In response, BJP MLA B A Basavaraj (Byrathi) said issuing TDR will not be a burden on the state government and appealed to the ruling Congress to reconsider its stance.
Minister Ramalinga Reddy too explained that the Karnataka government acquired the entire land way back in 1996.
The Mysuru royal family went to the High Court, which gave ruling in favour of the state government. The royal family then approached the Supreme Court, where the case is still going on, the Minister pointed out.
“The final judgment is pending in the SC to decide whether the acquisition was right or wrong. If the SC says it’s the royal family’s property then let it be so. If the order is in the state government’s favour then we can take a decision. The bill is only about it,” Reddy explained.
Speaker U T Khader then called for a voice vote and the bill was passed by the Assembly amidst opposition BJP’s discontent.