Record number of Afghan civilians killed in first half of 2018: UN
Kabul, July 15 : A total of 1,692 Afghan civilians were killed due to conflicts and terrorist attacks in the first half of this year, hitting a record high, a UN mission said on Sunday.
"Latest figures released today by the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) show continuing record high casualty rates being inflicted on the Afghan civilian population by the warring parties" Xinhua news agency quoted the mission as saying in a statement
"Covering the period from January 1 to June 30, findings include the killing of more civilians in the first six months of this year - 1,692 deaths - than at any comparable time over the last 10 years since records have been kept."
The UN mission started to monitor the situation of civilians and coordinate efforts to ensure their protection in 2009.
A total of 3,430 civilians were also injured during the period. Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) was the leading cause of civilian casualties.
"The combined use of suicide and non-suicide IEDs caused nearly half of all civilian casualties," the statement said.
Ground engagements were the second leading cause of civilian casualties, followed by targeted and deliberate killings, aerial operations and explosive remnants of war, according to the report.
The mission has attributed 67 per cent of the civilian casualties to the Taliban and other insurgent groups, 20 per cent to security forces over the period while the rest were unattributed or caused by other reasons.
The UNAMA also renewed its call to the conflicting parties to increase efforts to protect the civilian population and encouraged them to work towards reaching a peaceful settlement.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Farooq Abdullah backed Article 370 abrogation, claims Former RAW Chief A.S. Dulat
Srinagar: In a political bombshell, former RAW chief A.S. Dulat has alleged that National Conference (NC) president and former J&K Chief Minister Dr. Farooq Abdullah privately supported the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019. The claim, made in Dulat's new book “The Chief Minister and The Spy – An Unlikely Friendship”, has sparked a political storm and could potentially impact the Abdullah family's long-standing legacy in Kashmir.
Dulat stated that he was informally asked by the Modi-led central government to reach out to Abdullah, who was under house arrest at the time. According to him, Abdullah’s release came with two unspoken conditions: refraining from criticizing the abrogation and avoiding any reference to Pakistan. “Farooq was wise enough to grasp the message,” Dulat alleged.
He further claimed that Abdullah had shown willingness to cooperate with the Centre and allegedly remarked that the NC could have passed the proposal in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly—had they been consulted.
The Abdullah family, which has dominated Kashmiri politics since Sheikh Abdullah’s era, has publicly opposed the 2019 constitutional move. The new allegations stand in stark contrast to the party’s stated stance and its later efforts to restore the special status through the Gupkar Alliance.
Sajad Gani Lone, president of the Peoples Conference, said he was not surprised, calling Dulat Abdullah’s “alter ego.” He alleged that the NC’s public opposition masked private cooperation with Delhi. “The 2019 meeting between Farooq and the PM was no mystery,” he wrote on X, suggesting the party’s electoral success in 2024 was a reward for earlier cooperation.
PDP leader Iltija Mufti accused Abdullah of helping to “normalise the gutting of J&K’s constitution,” alleging he chose to stay politically relevant in Kashmir rather than resist in Parliament.
National Conference spokesperson Tanvir Sadiq categorically denied the claims, dismissing the book as a “figment of imagination.” He highlighted contradictions in Dulat’s account, noting that Farooq formed the People’s Alliance for Gupkar Declaration (PAGD) after his release to challenge the abrogation.
Sadiq also recalled that Dulat’s earlier book had made controversial claims about other leaders. “This is just another attempt to stay relevant,” he said.
While the National Conference has yet to release an official statement, Dulat’s claims have added a new layer of controversy to Kashmir’s political discourse, raising fresh questions about the behind-the-scenes developments surrounding the revocation of Article 370.
